Apocalypse Ben Hardy Joins the Cast of ‘X-Men: Apocalypse’

[Majik1387]

Where is that gif explaining it?

 

[GuestStar2004]

 

[Mutant 77]

DoFP already deleted all of X3; timestamps included.

NO.

Everything before 1973 still happened.

Said that, remove the timestamps. Angel was 40 in TLS.

 

[Avenging Angel]

I'm sure Singer and Kinberg would chuckle at this meme...

 

[Avenging Angel]

DoFP already deleted all of X3; timestamps included.

It still ingrains into our brains though.

 

[kasjan]

DoFP already deleted all of X3; timestamps included.

You shouldn't left school.

 

[Duran Man]

Still with the "you shouldn't left school?"

 

[GuestStar2004]

Well Mr kinberg was a good teacher

 

[Majik1387]

NO.

Yes.

Everything before 1973 still happened.

Correct. Angel was born after 1973 by no bounds to TLS.

Said that, remove the timestamps. Angel was 40 in TLS.

Angel doesn't exist in TLS because that timeline now never existed.

It still ingrains into our brains though.

It is now a What If? universe, and not part of main canon.

You shouldn't left school.

Curriculum was updated to today's standards and information. Time for you to re-enroll.

 

[EnDz0n3]

Correct. Angel was born after 1973 by no bounds to TLS.

Are you saying Angel is less than 10 years old in Apocalypse?

That evil Apocalypse always practicing child labour!

 

[Majik1387]

Well, with how Apocalypse messes with time, would not surprise me if he took Angel, and even Psylocke, from other times, or affected their aging.

 

[JP]

[blackout]He finds Psylocke working for Caliban.[/blackout]

 

[Frankeh]

Are you saying Angel is less than 10 years old in Apocalypse?

That evil Apocalypse always practicing child labour!

LOL.

Although Apocalypse time-hopping to find horsemen wouldn't have been that bad, certainly better for the continuity. Sadly time traveling was just a no after DOFP.

 

[EnDz0n3]

Well, with how Apocalypse messes with time, would not surprise me if he took Angel, and even Psylocke, from other times, or affected their aging.

Oh you guys...

 

[xrs13]

its like you guys like to set your self up for anger by wanting such minor details addressed.

 

[GuestStar2004]

Well, with how Apocalypse messes with time, would not surprise me if he took Angel, and even Psylocke, from other times, or affected their aging.

That's not likely to be the case

Plus everyone says about apocalypse playing with time but we don't know whether the film series counter-part can do that

 

[Mutant 77]

Correct. Angel was born after 1973 by no bounds to TLS.

Angel doesn't exist in TLS because that timeline now never existed.

You're wrong on all fronts.

Is this some new kind of creative trolling?

 

[Phoenix_Flare]

For those of you who watched the Rogue Cut Bishop explains that time traveling that far back can possibly change how ppl can either be killed earlier or not born. If you read between the lines their is also a possibility that ppl may be born earlier. Hence why we are getting a younger Jubilee and Angel right?

 

[Mutant 77]

For those of you who watched the Rogue Cut Bishop explains that time traveling that far back can possibly change how ppl can either be killed earlier or not born. If you read between the lines their is also a possibility that ppl may be born earlier. Hence why we are getting a younger Jubilee and Angel right?

Everything changes from 1973 onward...................... 1973.

 

[X-Maniac]

Well, the point of discussion is, of course, whether the time travel can affect any events earlier than 1973. Such as the birth of Angel and Jubilee.

That would seem to be illogical.

However, In DoFP there was a part where Hank/Beast spoke of ripples in the river of time - although the flow would correct itself. Ripples go in all directions.

The only other get-out clause for this scenario is what's called retro-causation, retro-causality or backward causation. Normally, we experience cause and then effect, but this is a hypothesis that suggests the effect of something can happen before the cause.

It's all complex and speculative but if, somehow, this happened, then some things EARLIER than 1973 would have been altered.

Normally, this is considered a separate thing from time travel. But we have to bear in mind that DoFP did not deploy the traditional concept of physical time travel (it was instead done with a consciousness) and also that all this is theoretical and time travel has, to our knowledge, never been achieved.

If all that feels too much and too forced, then just accept it's a creative retcon.

 

[EnDz0n3]

McAvoy as Xavier will say some vague monologue in the beginning about Logan's time travel causing some events to happen sooner and then the DNA strands will pop up and the bombastic X2 theme will be audible we will never hear another explanation about it ever again.

 

[JP]

McAvoy as Xavier will say some vague monologue in the beginning about Logan's time travel causing some events to happen sooner and then the DNA strands will pop up and the bombastic X2 theme will be audible we will never hear another explanation about it ever again.

Ideal.

 

[Frankeh]

McAvoy as Xavier will say some vague monologue in the beginning about Logan's time travel causing some events to happen sooner and then the DNA strands will pop up and the bombastic X2 theme will be audible we will never hear another explanation about it ever again.

The X2 theme? Damn it, I wanted a new one!

 

[Great Mind(s)]

That doesn't explain how someone can be born before 1973, after 1973.Unless there are two Angels etc. Obviously there is no real explanation and its just messed up continuity

 

[GuestStar2004]