Best Zombie Movie of All Time?!

No. I thought it was pretty okay for the first half of the movie but everybody pretty much turns into flaming ******s in the second half.
LOL... My favorite part is when the girl starts screaming "People need to know!" or something like that as soon as someone tells her to turn off the camera. She was super ready for the cover up, even when there was nothing to cover up as far as she knew :)

And since we are kinda still in the topic of slow vs fast, here is a nice reading from Simon Pegg on the subject

As an avid horror fan, I found the prospect of last week's five-night TV zombie spectacular rather exciting. Admittedly, the trailer for E4's Dead Set made me somewhat uneasy. The sight of newsreader Krishnan Guru-Murthy warning the populace of an impending zombie apocalypse induced a sickening sense of indignation. Only five years previously, Edgar Wright and I had hired Krishnan to do the very same thing in our own zombie opus, Shaun of the Dead. It was a bit like seeing an ex-lover walking down the street pushing a pram. Of course, this was a knee-jerk reaction. It's not as if Edgar and I hadn't already pushed someone else's baby up the cultural high street - but that, to some extent, was the point. In Shaun of the Dead, we lifted the mythology established by George A Romero in his 1968 film Night of the Living Dead and offset it against the conventions of a romantic comedy.

Still, I had to acknowledge Dead Set's impressive credentials. The concept was clever in its simplicity: a full-scale zombie outbreak coincides with a Big Brother eviction night, leaving the Big Brother house as the last refuge for the survivors. Scripted by Charlie Brooker, a writer whose scalpel-sharp incisiveness I have long been a fan of, and featuring talented actors such as Jaime Winstone and the outstanding Kevin Eldon, the show heralded the arrival of genuine homegrown horror, scratching at the fringes of network television. My expectations were high, and I sat down to watch a show that proved smart, inventive and enjoyable, but for one key detail: ZOMBIES DON'T RUN!

I know it is absurd to debate the rules of a reality that does not exist, but this genuinely irks me. You cannot kill a vampire with an MDF stake; werewolves can't fly; zombies do not run. It's a misconception, a bastardisation that diminishes a classic movie monster. The best phantasmagoria uses reality to render the inconceivable conceivable. The speedy zombie seems implausible to me, even within the fantastic realm it inhabits. A biological agent, I'll buy. Some sort of super-virus? Sure, why not. But death? Death is a disability, not a superpower. It's hard to run with a cold, let alone the most debilitating malady of them all.

More significantly, the fast zombie is bereft of poetic subtlety. As monsters from the id, zombies win out over vampires and werewolves when it comes to the title of Most Potent Metaphorical Monster. Where their pointy-toothed cousins are all about sex and bestial savagery, the zombie trumps all by personifying our deepest fear: death. Zombies are our destiny writ large. Slow and steady in their approach, weak, clumsy, often absurd, the zombie relentlessly closes in, unstoppable, intractable.

However (and herein lies the sublime artfulness of the slow zombie), their ineptitude actually makes them avoidable, at least for a while. If you're careful, if you keep your wits about you, you can stave them off, even outstrip them - much as we strive to outstrip death. Drink less, cut out red meat, exercise, practice safe sex; these are our shotguns, our cricket bats, our farmhouses, our shopping malls. However, none of these things fully insulates us from the creeping dread that something so witless, so elemental may yet catch us unawares - the drunk driver, the cancer sleeping in the double helix, the legless ghoul dragging itself through the darkness towards our ankles.

Another thing: speed simplifies the zombie, clarifying the threat and reducing any response to an emotional reflex. It's the difference between someone shouting "Boo!" and hearing the sound of the floorboards creaking in an upstairs room: a quick thrill at the expense of a more profound sense of dread. The absence of rage or aggression in slow zombies makes them oddly sympathetic, a detail that enabled Romero to project depth on to their blankness, to create tragic anti-heroes; his were figures to be pitied, empathised with, even rooted for. The moment they appear angry or petulant, the second they emit furious velociraptor screeches (as opposed to the correct mournful moans of longing), they cease to possess any ambiguity. They are simply mean.

So how did this break with convention come about? The process has unfolded with all the infuriating dramatic irony of an episode of Fawlty Towers. To begin at the beginning, Haitian folklore tells of voodoo shamans, or bokors, who would use digitalis, derived from the foxglove plant, to induce somnambulant trances in individuals who would subsequently appear dead. Weeks later, relatives of the supposedly deceased would witness their lost loved ones in a soporific malaise, working in the fields of wealthy landowners, and assume them to be nzambi (a west African word for "spirit of the dead"). From the combination of nzambi and somnambulist ("sleepwalker") we get the word zombie.

The legend was appropriated by the film industry, and for 20 or 30 years a steady flow of voodoo-based cinema emerged from the Hollywood horror factory. Then a young filmmaker from Pittsburgh by the name of George A Romero changed everything. Romero's fascination with Richard Matheson's novel I Am Legend, the story of a lone survivor struggling in a world overrun by vampires, led him to fixate on an aspect of the story leapfrogged by the author: namely, the process by which humanity is subjugated by the aggressive new species. Romero adopted the Haitian zombie and combined it with notions of cannibalism, as well as the viral communicability characterised by the vampire and werewolf myths, and so created the modern zombie.

After three films spanning three decades, and much imitation from film-makers such as Lucio Fulci and Dan O'Bannon, the credibility of the zombie was dealt a cruel blow by the king of pop. Michael Jackson's Thriller video, directed by John Landis, was entertaining but made it rather difficult for us to take zombies seriously, having witnessed them body-popping. The blushing dead went quiet for a while, until the Japanese video game company Capcom developed the game Resident Evil, which brilliantly captured the spirit of Romero's shambling antagonists (Romero even directed a trailer for the second installment). Slow and steady, the zombie commenced its stumble back into our collective subconscious.

Inspired by the game and a shared love of Romero, Edgar Wright and I decided to create our own black comedy. Meanwhile, Danny Boyle and Alex Garland were developing their own end-of-the-world fable, 28 Days Later, an excellent film misconstrued by the media as a zombie flick. Boyle and Garland never set out to make a zombie film per se. They drew instead on John Wyndham's Day of the Triffids, as well as Matheson and Romero's work, to fashion a new strain of survival horror, featuring a London beset by rabid propagators of a virus known as "rage".

The success of the movie, particularly in the US, was undoubtedly a factor in the loose remake of Romero's Dawn of the Dead in 2004. Zack Snyder's effective but pointless reboot parlayed Boyle's "infected" into the upgraded zombie 2.0, likely at the behest of some cigar-chomping, focus-group-happy movie exec desperate to satisfy the MTV generation's demand for quicker everything - quicker food, quicker downloads, quicker dead people. The zombie was ushered on to the mainstream stage, on the proviso that it sprinted up to the mic. The genre was diminished, and I think it's a shame.

Despite my purist griping, I liked Dead Set a lot. It had solid performances, imaginative direction, good gore and the kind of inventive writing and verbal playfulness we've come to expect from the always brilliant Brooker. As a satire, it took pleasing chunks out of media bumptiousness and, more significantly, the aggressive collectivism demonstrated by the lost souls who waste their Friday nights standing outside the Big Brother house, baying for the blood of those inside. Like Romero, Brooker simply nudges the metaphor to its literal conclusion, and spatters his point across our screens in blood and brains and bits of skull. If he had only eschewed the zeitgeist and embraced the docile, creeping weirdness that has served to embed the zombie so deeply in our grey matter, Dead Set might have been my favourite piece of television ever. As it was, I had to settle for it merely being bloody good.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/nov/04/television-simon-pegg-dead-set
 
LOL... My favorite part is when the girl starts screaming "People need to know!" or something like that as soon as someone tells her to turn off the camera. She was super ready for the cover up, even when there was nothing to cover up as far as she knew :)

Or how about at the end when stealth is essential to their survival and she can do nothing but SHRIEK incessantly. Just SCREAMING AND SCREAMING AND SCREAMING.

If I was the cameraman I would have strangled her right there and then.

And Kudos to Pegg.

I'd still say 28 Days Later is close enough to be called a Zombie movie though.
 
Or how about at the end when stealth is essential to their survival and she can do nothing but SHRIEK incessantly. Just SCREAMING AND SCREAMING AND SCREAMING.

If I was the cameraman I would have strangled her right there and then.
I think the whole movie was based on screaming to the camera, to freak you out... :woot:

And Kudos to Pegg.

I'd still say 28 Days Later is close enough to be called a Zombie movie though.
Same here. Clinical death doesn't make a zombie... So what? vampires are zombies? Is Robocop a zombie? It's all about unstopabble, mindless killers, reanimated or not :oldrazz:
 
Running or walking zombies are both fine with me. They're both scary. I can understand what Pegg was saying and I agree but I just want to have a fun time sometimes with zombie movies. I love what Romero does and his social issues with the slow zombies. That's great but I want to be scared. Part of what makes these situations so damn compelling is you can out yourself in these situations and imagine what they would be like. And in real life, both are scary as hell. I like the slow zombies of the inevitable and constant danger of them, but fast zombies are just as scary. They can catch you, they're more fierce, and it lends to suspense ala the tunnel scene in 28 Days Later. They are out there, waiting to prey on you like animals. It makes it more dangerous.

There are fast infected (they aren't really zombies) in my Left 4 Dead script so maybe that's one of the reasons I'm defending it. The infection is completely ambiguous like the game. You have no idea where it came from or what it is. But it's a rabies virus pretty much hence them running and their fierceness. So they aren't reanimated or previously dead.

I had an idea of writing another zombie movie or short script. About how a zombie pandemic effects certain blood types. The only people who are immune to it are A negatives and they try to survive. So it means less people, less chances of soldiers helping, etc.

Maybe do a black zombie comedy call Panepidemic.
 
Last edited:
[rec]. javier botet is by far the sexiest zombie i've ever seen....even though he's playing a female.
 
Nah, the sexiest zombie is that big breasts girl that walks in front of the Winchester in Shaun of the Dead
 
Good God. What next? Sexy vampires?

Oh wait...
 
Zambi!

zambifinal2.jpg
 
Most Realistic: 28 Days Later (Creating something like The Rage Virus for no real reason is just the sort of thing The Government would do, which makes the movie that much scarier.)

Most Original: Night Of The Living Dead (The original black & white version that started it all.)

Best Made: Dawn Of The Dead (The 1978 original, very well made in every technical sense. The remake was okay too.)

Funniest: Return Of The Living Dead (You just gotta laugh at the whole brain eating thing, how organized the zombies are, etc. "Send more cops.")

Personally, I don't find zombie movies very scary. Movies about homicidal maniacs and haunted houses are far scarier to me. But I do find them rather enjoyable in a "movie fan" sorta way. Here's one I haven't seen on this thread yet (granted I haven't read through every post yet). Children Shouldn't Play With Dead Things is so bad it's good. The whole damn thing looks like a film school project, from the writing, to the acting, right down to the special effects.
 
Most Realistic: 28 Days Later (Creating something like The Rage Virus for no real reason is just the sort of thing The Government would do, which makes the movie that much scarier.)
The backstory of the virus is that it was actually an attempt to stop violence. And in a very movie like fashion.... hilarity ensued.
 
The backstory of the virus is that it was actually an attempt to stop violence. And in a very movie like fashion.... hilarity ensued.
Cool, I didn't know that.

Also even though I haven't seen it in a long time and it's probably a little dated now,I have fond memories of Dan O'Bannon's Return of the dead. (not the best zombie movie of all time by any means but still a pretty good addition to the genre nonetheless imo.)

"Brains !... More brains !":woot:
 
Return of the Living Dead is also helped by the fact that Linnea Quigley's wardrobe is Brother Chuck'd and fast.
 
Most Realistic: 28 Days Later (Creating something like The Rage Virus for no real reason is just the sort of thing The Government would do, which makes the movie that much scarier.)

Most Original: Night Of The Living Dead (The original black & white version that started it all.)

Best Made: Dawn Of The Dead (The 1978 original, very well made in every technical sense. The remake was okay too.)

Funniest: Return Of The Living Dead (You just gotta laugh at the whole brain eating thing, how organized the zombies are, etc. "Send more cops.")

Completely agree with this particular list.
 
I think the whole movie was based on screaming to the camera, to freak you out... :woot:


Same here. Clinical death doesn't make a zombie... So what? vampires are zombies? Is Robocop a zombie? It's all about unstopabble, mindless killers, reanimated or not :oldrazz:

Wrong. Zombies come from the voodoo at first. They used black magic to make the death rise again, in order to make them work like slaves. The first movie to use these zombies, was white zombie with Bela Lugosi.

Romero changed things in 1968 with night of the living dead. Exit the voodoo thing, and since then most of the zombies, (who are also called living dead, not mutated living) have been flesh eaters.

The infected in 28 days are not zombies. they are not living dead, and they are not flesh eaters/

that said, the original Romero trilogy is awesome. Zombie honeymoon is great as well. The serpent and the rainbow is creepy as hell.
 
The ones in 28 Days Later are just mutated living, aren't they? They've got rabies.
 
Can someone help me find a zombie movie I haven't been able to find for years?

It may have been mentioned here but I was pretty young when I saw it. I remember one scene mainly and that had a group of pre-teens or teens. Forget which and they end up finding animal brains and feed it to the zombies to fend them off as they make their getaway in a truck I think?

I know that seems incredibly vague but that's literally all I remember about the movie.

EDIT: Found it. It was Return of the Living Dead Part II. Need to see that again. I remember really enjoying it as a kid.
 
Last edited:
that doesn't ring a bell to me. Do you remember how many years ago you saw it? was it released in the 80's?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,268
Messages
22,077,068
Members
45,876
Latest member
Crazygamer3011
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"