Piper Maru
Guest
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2012
- Messages
- 7,452
- Reaction score
- 5
- Points
- 31
I love 28 Days Later!
I saw Night of the Living Dead 1990 a few days ago. It was a pretty good remake.
No doubt, Romero's ( The Original ) NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD & DAWN OF THE DEAD. SHAUN OF THE DEAD comes in for third, then RETURN OF THE LIVING DEAD. And although it's not a movie, THE WALKING DEAD should receive honorable mention.
28 Days Later is not a zombie movie.
I agree with the bold part. In a similar note, I'd give honorable mention to Dead Set. I watched that last Halloween. A very good British miniseries.
About the whole "Running Zombies vs Walking Zombies" debate. I read a very good explanation which uses both styles in the same "story". I think it was The Zombie Survival Guide, or maybe a Zombie Survival poster. Anyway, it said that when they're first animated, zombies are as fast and nearly as coordinated as they were in life. Then when rigor sets in, they become stiff and slow. Once the muscles relax again, they become faster (almost as fast as when they were first animated). But as their bodies rot and decompose, they become slower and less coordinated. That's when they're your stereotypical slow walking zombies.
I don't know for sure, but I think they might use that system for the upcoming World War Z.
I've been a fan of the zombie genre for many years now. But it always seems to be the same thing over, group of survivors hold up in some kind of shelter to fend of hordes of the undead. This seems to be repeating thing in nearly every zombie film, which is okay with me still, but I'd like to see a different take on the zombie film. Can anyone recommend a film which strays from this particular formula?
Léo Ho Tep;24283109 said:Dead Set was quite good indeed. Your explanation is interesting. It's still important to notice that infected people (like the ones in 28 days and 28 weeks) are not zombies. In the dawn of the dead remake, they show fast zombies. And they truly are zombies, regardless of their speed.
It's not the speed actually that makes them being zombies or infected. It's the nature of their existence. Living dead are zombies, regardless of their speed. Infected people are not dead in the first place.
Yes, it was pretty good, though it had some stupid ass characters.That was the first zombie movie that I ever watched, been hooked ever since. I really like the original version as well.
I never could buy the whole " dead reanimated by a virus theory". It seems like every since " Resident Evil " and " World War Z ", the whole Zombies being caused by a virus thing has been the explanation lately. Kinda lazy if you ask me, like Marvel's " I have super powers because I was born with a mutant gene explanation. " I prefer my zombies revived by supernatural, alien, chemical, radiation, etc, instead of virus, or better yet, no explanation at all.
Yeah, but how does a virus re-animate dead tissue ? Also, I always wondered, if zombies are truly dead, and the only thing that's left functioning is the brain, how do they digest flesh ? woulnd'n't their stomachs eventually explode from lack of digestion and BM ? Still think the whole virus thing is a cop-out like the " X-Gene".
LOL I remember reading on cracked.com on how a zombie apocalypse wouldn't suceed, and everybody in the comment section that disargeed kept metioning the solanum virus , Max Brooks, and his Zombie survival guide.