Freddy_Krueger
Civilian
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2006
- Messages
- 646
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 11
I don't know how much more I can say this. She's ILLEGALLY tresspassing on someone's property because she thought that property was the source to a city-wide blackout. She had no idea who is in there. She knocked, heard nothing...and continued snooping around with her child. She had no idea what to expect while committing ILLEGAL activity. And she brought on a little super-accomplice. You suggest it is illegal to leave child in car. I agree with that. Leaving a child in car is illegal and stupid. But what's even more illegal and stupid is bringing a child to commit an illegal act investigate potential criminal entity. Both are illegal and stupid, but one puts the child in the center of great risk . If Lois was hurt as she went in snooping in some stranger's house, Jason could have seen what happened or heard screaming and at least get out of the car and run away, calling the cops or whatnot.
Again, no one is denying that it was an illegal activity. No one's saying she was being a great parent by bringing Jason along. We're just saying she expected a quickie interview, nothing more. It's very much in Lois' character to go where she isn't supposed to go.
Uhhhmm....that was our entire argument. Thanks for conceding her parenting skills deserving some treatment. The point of being a good parent is that it doesn't matter what you're good at, your child comes first. Obviously not with Lois.
Actually the argument was Jason being a murderer. Somehow, someway it turned into the "Lois is a bad mother" thing.
Since everyone is in love with Superman and don't care about a city-wide blackout, Lois is the only reporter with the chutzpah to investigate a story that might lead to uncovering a diabolic conspiracy or at best a safety hazard. It simply doesn't matter who owns the boat. Lois has NO idea what to expect when she entered that boat. Now, she may be willing to risk her own life for story (something that debatable as whether a mother should do that, that's another argument for another time)....but risking her son's life in the process is reprehensible.
She expects a quickie interview. It may lead to another clue in her investigation, or it may be a dead end to her investigation. She doesn't know. We know that she just wanted to ask some questions and then go with Jason and Richard to the Pulitzer awards.
Yeah, she didn't realize it was life threatening until after she snooped around in Lex Luthor's bedroom.
Ummm...yeah. Exactly. Thus why she says that it was a bad idea. By then, however, it is too late and our conflict arises.
This isn't about liking or disliking a film. It's the ability to rationalize absurd, idiotic, and reprehensible behavior in a story for the sake of 'creating conflict'. II don't hate this movie. It was ok popcorn fun. I rate it 6.5 out of 10. Not great...but not bad. But failing to acknowledge bad characterization and illogical behavior involves giving the script a free pass. I simply won't do that.
I don't think it's bad characterization or bad writing. You may, that's your right, that's your opinion. Personally I find it very much in Lois' character to go on that boat for a story. She put her career ahead of her parenting and she paid for it.