No, i'm saying that Angelus has a lot of traces of Angel before he became a vampire, than after he gained a soul, i never implied that he didn't have a soul beforeThis confuses me.
Are you trying to say Liam (Human Angel) didn't have a soul? Because he did, he was just a drunken bastard. Which is the point I was trying to make. Just because you have a soul doesn't mean you'll be a good person.
I dont know I still call Spike out like Angel did that he only got his soul to get into Buffy's pants. far from his noble reasoning. And Spike stated many times in the series that he didnt really care about atonement. It shifted alitte by the end but he still says the reason he wanted the shanshu was so angel could not have it.
Still, the main difference between the two is that Spike wanted his soul. Angel didn't. That says a lot.
And yeah, Spike may be a petty *******, but so is Angel sometimes. And I think there was subtext there of Spike wanting to prove he's good by claiming the prophecy just as much as Angel does.
Still, the main difference between the two is that Spike wanted his soul. Angel didn't. That says a lot.
And yeah, Spike may be a petty *******, but so is Angel sometimes. And I think there was subtext there of Spike wanting to prove he's good by claiming the prophecy just as much as Angel does.
Probably because his vens were drained of blood every time his master was thirsty, his life was terrible and he wanted to escape from his terrible masterPlus that slave was weird and creepy.
No, i'm saying that Angelus has a lot of traces of Angel before he became a vampire, than after he gained a soul, i never implied that he didn't have a soul before
to be fair that guy was taking initiative in killing a kid.after all the stuff angles been threw.its not really surprising that his tolerance for such crap hit an all time low.that's not the type of person that learns his lesson some day.thats the guy whos conviction is to what wolf manram&heart is.so really he was just being proactive and dealing with a problem now as opposed to dealing with it laterBut yeah, Angel was pretty brutal toward the end of his show. Hell, he murdered that human W&H grunt in the first episode of season 5 with his own shotgun. A couple seasons earlier, he probably would've tried to save him or, at the very least, imprison him humanely.
I was not pleased with Lindsey's murder. They did the same thing to Krycek in the X-Files. The badass flip-flopper always has to die.Yeah, same goes for Lindsey. Once he stopped flip-flopping and proved he was totally irredeemable, Angel had Lorne straight-up execute him. I guess that W&H operative just proved it a lot quicker by shooting up a school.
All these things you all are discussing are the reasons I always preferred Angel as a character over fan-favorite Spike. At the end of the day, Spike (especially in later seasons) just seemed a bit like your typical "woobie" character - "bad boy" on the outside, insecure little marshmallow on the inside just looking for love. The type of character that's just made for teenage girls to fall in love with.
Angel, on the other hand, always had this true dark side to him, and I'm not necessarily talking about Angelus. There was something...grittier and hardened about him, like a real noir hero, that I always found endlessly fascinating. Of course, he mostly didn't show these colors until he left Buffy, so I didn't really love him as a character 'til he went solo.
For the record, I loved Spike too - two of my all-time favorite episodes of Buffy were Spike-centric (Fool for Love and Lies My Parents Told Me), and his character was beautifully-realized... but on the whole, I just didn't find him as interesting or as surprising a character as Angel.
See, I felt he grew INTO that character over time. He didn't start out that way, imo. Once Marti Noxon took over in S5, she totally turned Spike into that character that the teen girl demo covets - the lovesick bad boy who needs to prove his worthiness to the heroine. Before that, he was a fun-yet-sensitive villain. And while he became more noble and more interested in the big picture in the final season, even after he sacrificed himself for the greater good, it always came back to The Girl with Spike, one way or another. He protected Dawn for Buffy. He got his soul for Buffy. He joined The Cause for Buffy. And until about episode 20 of the final season of Angel, he was constantly talking about getting back to Buffy at some point, now that he was a proven hero and she had finally acknowledged that the she cared for him.I think that's true that Spike was designed that way and the guy who Dawn loses her virginity to fits that description almost to a tee. But Spike grows beyond that over time and that's one of the keys of the character.
See, I felt he grew INTO that character over time. He didn't start out that way, imo. Once Marti Noxon took over in S5, she totally turned Spike into that character that the teen girl demo covets - the lovesick bad boy who needs to prove his worthiness to the heroine. Before that, he was a fun-yet-sensitive villain. And while he became more noble and more interested in the big picture in the final season, even after he sacrificed himself for the greater good, it always came back to The Girl with Spike, one way or another. He protected Dawn for Buffy. He got his soul for Buffy. He joined The Cause for Buffy. And until about episode 20 of the final season of Angel, he was constantly talking about getting back to Buffy at some point, now that he was a proven hero and she had finally acknowledged that the she cared for him.
Angel, on the other hand, never stopped seeing Buffy as the most important person in his life, but he had a lot bigger things on his mind, and his accomplishments didn't all boil back to trying to prove himself to a girl. I just found Angel's character a lot harder to pin down and therefore more interesting.
I know sound like a total Spike-basher, but I love him. And despite being a well-worn TV trope of a character, I think he's one of the very best examples of that character type TV has seen. Like I said, he was beautifully-realized and his vast evolution always seemed perfectly organic. I just found Angel's character a bit harder to pin down and therefore more interesting on the whole.
I'm not sure Spike ever changed that much, even in School Hard when he first sees Buffy at the Bronze there's a hint of attraction. He get's lovesick in season 5/6 but he's still him and he get's the bad boy back in season 7. But he's always William the Bloody deep down (in both senses)
The Corpulent 1 said:That's the main difference between Spike and Angel: Spike never repents for a damn thing. Angel regains his soul and spends decades feeling horrible for what he's done, then decades more attempting to atone. Spike regains his soul and he's like, "Yeah, I totally did all that s***. But now I'm good, so forget all that and let me back in your pants, Buffy!"
I may be exaggerating a bit, but the point still stands.