can a woman rape a man?

ShadowBoxing said:
Show us on the doll where Cindy touched you....and be very descriptive please.
Inside or outside... :cool:



:(



everywhere...
 
Joe Kerr said:
Inside or outside... :cool:



:(



everywhere...
It's okay Tracy, let it out, it's okay. We know Cindy did not mean to. Now lets see you both kiss and make up.

Court stenographer, please take detailed notes....and photographs...
 
Shadow and Chibi have about covered all the bases. Yes, a man can be raped by a woman. Don't forget that rape is crime that is less about sex as it is about power and domination and there are many ways for it to occur, not all of them by force.

jag
 
Docker said:
you're right. I apologize. I don't know enough about it I guess. Porn has a lot to do with it! Have you seen some of the porn they have out? girls getting raped on film!? its sick! How can anyone get turned by beating or choking someone to death!? :confused:

Some people have rather disturbing outlets for their sexual repression. There are those who find being bit so hard that blood is drawn or choked to the point that consciousness is lost is really arousing. It's in the same sense how some can find rape an action worth investing in. It's disgusting, but the truth of the matter is that it is unfortunately being done probably someplace on this planet as I post this.
 
Can a woman rape a man? As evidence I give you Rescue Me. A character gave Dennis Leary a viagra/sleeping pill cocktail and is able to rape him.
 
This thread just keeps getting weirder and weirder.......
 
ShadowBoxing said:
You...you've watched rape porno:confused: :(
I'm into leather, so I thought the girl was dominating the man so I wanted to see it. dammit not the other way around! it's sick! why I find a woman making a man doing degrading things sexy is beyond me! :confused:
 
Tsunulia said:
This thread just keeps getting weirder and weirder.......
That's sexual harassment, and I don't have to take it. :cmad:
 
ChibiKiriyama said:
Some people have rather disturbing outlets for their sexual repression. There are those who find being bit so hard that blood is drawn or choked to the point that consciousness is lost is really arousing. It's in the same sense how some can find rape an action worth investing in. It's disgusting, but the truth of the matter is that it is unfortunately being done probably someplace on this planet as I post this.

Okay, here's where I have to disagree with you. There are a lot of pretty hardcore things that go on in the BDSM scene that I think obviously would squick you out. Biting to the point of bleeding and heavy breath play to the point of unconsciousness are some of those things. They're considered edge play, but they are a part of the scene. No matter how disgusting you might find these things to be, the reality is that those things happen between partners in a safe and CONSENSUAL manner. Rape is ANYTHING but consensual, and as a member of the leather community myself I really have to take offense to the concepts you're putting forth in your above post. Rape is a horrible crime perpetrated by someone with some serious power issues on another human being who was completely unwilling. BDSM is for the most part safe, sane, consensual, and an expression of intimacy between the parties involved. Please don't compare them.

Thank you,
jag
 
Yes they can, my ex sure did
 
well according to law and order svu you can get a guy unconscious..put this metal electric rod up his ass and he'll have it up for hours :confused:

ok seriously though, i haven't seen this episode but i'll just give my opinion from other stories. according to the law it's rape. i knew a girl who lied about her age and slept with this one guy who was over 18. sooner or later some people found out and last i heard he was being charged with statitory rape.

according to cases like these no i don't consider it rape rape . the boy who had sex with his teacher twice and then told on her ,,,i don't justify it as him being the victim. maybe because guys at my school are getting laid in the 7th grade and are basically hitting on anything that moves and have about 2 to 3 rubbers in their wallets. or the kid who had sex with his teach 43 times and then call that rape..no. statiatory rape yeah but rape no. i sort of get ticked off when let's say this one story i heard while these two girls were talking

"this one chick is 14 and she's dating a 19 year old"

" that's rape"

wtf?:confused:
 
Dew k. Mosi said:
I was always confused on this too. I always thought of "female on male rape" more as molestation, because I thought rape meant "forced penetration."

That's the way state law in VA describes it{I'm sure these types of laws differ from state to state like the proper age of consent, etc. . . }, but it also takes it a step further and dictates that rape is "forced penetration of the clitorus."

State officials have been trying to change that law for some time now; because of its detailed specification, sex-offenders who take advantage of females in an oral way, or take advantage of males are charged w/ a lesser penalty because of that arguable technicality.

I'm not exactly sure how much less of a charge aggravated sexual assault is as opposed to a harsher punishment, but that's usually the charge.
_____________________________________________________________

Docker said:
I'm watching Oprah(why? I've no clue but I'm straight), and they had like 16 year old boys talking about how their hot teachers raped and molested them.

Rape is rape. These technicalites[like detailed rape definitions probably do more damage than good to the victim, esp if they don't fit what the jurisdictional law deems as the 'profile'.]

Societal views have a lot to do w/ this as well. I've noticed that the more attractive women who commit this type of crime are given 'slaps on the wrists' as compared to some of the rougher looking, older females. The crime is the same, but they're judged differently in most cases.:confused:

Then too, each circumstance is different. Yes, it's true that most teenage boys are hormone driven sexual deviants who may fantasize, converse, and even lyingly boast about this type of thing, but that doesn't change the law. Even if a young male under the age wants to (consentual intercourse), the law still gives a penalty. When an underage male is unwillingly influenced or coerced into such a thing due to inexperience or fear of seeming odd for rejecting a promiscuous offer, I'd view him as the victim. <how is an underage sexually inexperienced male any different from an underage sexually inexperienced female?>

Even though I'd take that stance, if it was proven that the young male involved was openly boasting about it/a co-catalyst in the sexual circumstance, I wouldn't mind giving the female defendant leniency, while still upholding the law. [I have the same view if the genders were reversed.]

Too many underage girls purposely try to sleep w/ older men, and even though that's another issue, I think that the ones who intentionally do that get off a little easier than their male counterparts(no pun intended you perverts), if and when the law intervenes.

It's almost as if society still has this stigma that males are automatically more sexually dominant(very false), and this carries over into judicial interpretation.
 
jaguarr said:
Okay, here's where I have to disagree with you. There are a lot of pretty hardcore things that go on in the BDSM scene that I think obviously would squick you out. Biting to the point of bleeding and heavy breath play to the point of unconsciousness are some of those things. They're considered edge play, but they are a part of the scene. No matter how disgusting you might find these things to be, the reality is that those things happen between partners in a safe and CONSENSUAL manner. Rape is ANYTHING but consensual, and as a member of the leather community myself I really have to take offense to the concepts you're putting forth in your above post. Rape is a horrible crime perpetrated by someone with some serious power issues on another human being who was completely unwilling. BDSM is for the most part safe, sane, consensual, and an expression of intimacy between the parties involved. Please don't compare them.

Thank you,
jag

I'm not comparing them at all. Dockers was speaking about the notion of violent acts in sex (which are still disturbing even whilst consensual), and I replied with my feelings on it. I checked my post, and still can't seem to find where I compare them. All I said is that while I find it disturbing it is something that occurs frequently.
 
Morg said:
Yes they can, my ex sure did
Really? I need her number cuase I'm doing a study on this. I'll willingly take part in this study as she beats and spanks me so that I may understand how a man copes with this and for the good of mankind. :o
 
ChibiKiriyama said:
I'm not comparing them at all. Dockers was speaking about the notion of violent acts in sex (which are still disturbing even whilst consensual), and I replied with my feelings on it. I checked my post, and still can't seem to find where I compare them. All I said is that while I find it disturbing it is something that occurs frequently.

EDIT: Here's what set me off about your original post:

ChibiKiriyama said:
It's in the same sense how some can find rape an action worth investing in.

When I read that, it seemed to me you were putting BDSM related activities into the same bucket as rape when it comes to the mindset and predelictions of those that perform them, which is where I got the impression you were comparing rape and BDSM. The mindsets of a rapist and a person of kink are VERY different, so it's not really the same sense that a rapist finds their actions worth investing in as someone involved in BDSM does. Again, if I'm misinterpreting your intentions, I apologize, but that's what I'm getting from your choice of words.

jag
 
Dew k. Mosi said:
I was always confused on this too. I always thought of "female on male rape" more as molestation, because I thought rape meant "forced penetration."

she forced him to penetrate her. problem solved.
 
jaguarr said:
Then I misunderstood the intentions of your post. My bad.

jag

Perfectly fine. No harm no foul. :)

Alpha and Omega said:
Societal views have a lot to do w/ this as well. I've noticed that the more attractive women who commit this type of crime are given 'slaps on the wrists' as compared to some of the rougher looking, older females. The crime is the same, but they're judged differently in most cases.:confused:

True. In some facets the notion of a boy being raped is deemed silly and the incident is seen as a sexual affair the woman initiated, which is a rather different outcome than when a man rapes a woman or girl. I find most of the time that the general attitude is that it's not rape if the woman in question is sexually attractive and people believe the incident was more beneficial than traumatic; beauty seems to somehow exonerate the wrong performed, which I don't agree with.
 
a girl tried to trick me into getting her pregnant. does that count?
 
Docker said:
Really? I need her number cuase I'm doing a study on this. I'll willingly take part in this study as she beats and spanks me so that I may understand how a man copes with this and for the good of mankind. :o


You need a large bank account, it's her MO. Have sex with you and then soon she worms her trust with you she cleans your bank account out
 
jaguarr said:
EDIT: Here's what set me off about your original post:



When I read that, it seemed to me you were putting BDSM related activities into the same bucket as rape when it comes to the mindset and predelictions of those that perform them, which is where I got the impression you were comparing rape and BDSM. The mindsets of a rapist and a person of kink are VERY different, so it's not really the same sense that a rapist finds their actions worth investing in as someone involved in BDSM does. Again, if I'm misinterpreting your intentions, I apologize, but that's what I'm getting from your choice of words.

jag
what is BDSM? :confused:
 
Morg said:
You need a large bank account, it's her MO. Have sex with you and then soon she worms her trust with you she cleans your bank account out
and whats new about this situation?


:cool:
 
Um, you are suggesting that just because someone was aroused, that they wanted to have sex. Arousal is entirely visceral, and does not depend on logic. By your standards, any teenager with a ***** wants to have sex, regardless of moral or religious objection to the concept.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"