I kinda like it.... mostly just because so many of you hate it, but.![]()
Even Andy Warhol looked better!
That aside, if he's Magneto's son and the characterization is good, then the Avengers version will be inferior even with a better look.
Even Andy Warhol looked better!
That aside, if he's Magneto's son and the characterization is good, then the Avengers version will be inferior even with a better look.
It's obviously a spoof article but, in light of the decidedly mixed reaction to Quicksilver's dorky design...
http://www.theouthousers.com/index....n-to-ruin-comic-book-movies-for-everyone.html
Fake Whedon said:Seriously, we could put Aaron Taylor-Johnson (who plays Quicksilver in the upcoming Avengers 2 film) in a soiled adult diaper and it would look better than this.

But the Avengers version will have the sibling dynamic this Quicksilver is missing. So both aren't perfect.
Except you don't arbitrarily choose your supporting cast based on nonsense like that, you choose them based on the conflict they will introduce into the story you want to tell...Not if Singer uses Wanda later on... anyway, it was stupid for Whedon to use them knowing all the limitations, Marvel should've went with Hank and Janet, even Black Panther would've been a better option, but what's done is done.
Not if Singer uses Wanda later on... anyway, it was stupid for Whedon to use them knowing all the limitations, Marvel should've went with Hank and Janet, even Black Panther would've been a better option, but what's done is done.
The only limitation for Whedon's use of the characters lies in their parentage, a ret-con done 15 years after the character's first appearance, and their mutant background. Both are likely to be adjusted in the pages of Marvel comics before the release of Avengers: Age of Ultron.
Why make post like this?Your just opening up the Disney/marvel Studios VS
Fox debate.Jesus even on big X-Men day some can't stop tolling.
You have every right to prefer their films over X-Men films but still why go there?
Why make post like this?Your just opening up the Disney/marvel Studios VS
Fox debate.Jesus even on big X-Men day some can't stop tolling.
You have every right to prefer their films over X-Men films but still why go there?
Why make post like this?Your just opening up the Disney/marvel Studios VS
Fox debate.Jesus even on big X-Men day some can't stop tolling.
You have every right to prefer their films over X-Men films but still why go there?
Why make post like this?Your just opening up the Disney/marvel Studios VS
Fox debate.Jesus even on big X-Men day some can't stop tolling.
I'm not "tolling" - I'm responding to a poster who mentioned limitations to the MCU Wanda and Pietro that may not exist by 2015. I'll try to be more respectful on X-Men Day.
. "Oh yeah," said Mark Millar, Fox's vague consultant and chief spokesperson for the films. "We're definitely out to kill excitement for superhero movies with this one."It's obviously a spoof article but, in light of the decidedly mixed reaction to Quicksilver's dorky design...
http://www.theouthousers.com/index....n-to-ruin-comic-book-movies-for-everyone.html
Why make post like this?Your just opening up the Disney/marvel Studios VS
Fox debate.Jesus even on big X-Men day some can't stop tolling.
You have every right to prefer their films over X-Men films but still why go there?
It's obviously a spoof article but, in light of the decidedly mixed reaction to Quicksilver's dorky design...
http://www.theouthousers.com/index....n-to-ruin-comic-book-movies-for-everyone.html