Nelson/Murdock
Attorneys at Law
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2012
- Messages
- 48
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 1
Why would there be? Plus, the rights don't revert until October.So has there been any news regarding the film rights recently? I havent read or heard a peep.
Why would there be? Plus, the rights don't revert until October.So has there been any news regarding the film rights recently? I havent read or heard a peep.
Whenever I see Damian Lewis in something I always think he'd make a great Matt Murdock. Just thought I'd put it out there. I searched the thread and saw no mentions of him.
![]()

I loved Ben Affleck as Daredevil.
Dont know why people hated it so much.
He wasn't bad.
The script was.
And the director.
I didn't see anything wrong with the actor, the director, or the script. In my book, DD is still one of the most underrated comic book films out there, undeservingly so. Although in all fairness, the director's cut is by far the better version.
The film is still hampered by hammy acting that renders scenes that should have dramatic weight false.
Yes, that too.
The director's cut isn't terrible, it's just average for me. The theatrical is abysmal. I can see that Mark Steven Johnson's heart was in the right place - he really seemed to have a love for the source material and tried to honour it, but he just isn't a good writer. The screenplay is riddled with cliches, the dialogue is clunky and the tone is just wrong. It tries too hard to have 'cool' moments for 13-year-old boys rather than going for something more resonant.
I do agree it's a little too derided for what it is, but on the other hand what it is isn't that good. There are parts that work well for me...costume design is great, the visuals are actually quite nice. The score is great. The origin is done pretty well.
But the romance is mishandled. Bullseye is played as completely camp. Jennifer Garner was miscast.
I think some of the actors should share the blame, but not completely. They are all decent actors in their own right - something went wrong with the way they were directed.
Also, in those dramatic scenes, the dialogue is incredibly cliche. "I'm not the bad guy kid". I remember cringing the first time I heard that. It's hard to deliver a great performance when you are saying lines like that.
Yeah, I have a far bigger problem with Jen as Elektra than Ben as Matt. Garner is a very good actress at roles she's suited for, but Elektra should not have been portrayed that way (and the Elektra sequel made it even worse), nor should the romance. I hope that when DD and Elektra reboot onscreen some glorious day, they play it as more of a battle than a love affair; like Batman and Catwoman. Their relationship should be more cat-and-mouse, hunter-and-prey than just the playful romp we saw in MSJ's movie.
And the director.
I'd focus on the San Francisco years. This way it is different enough from the Affleck movie and can be a pseudo sequel like TIH without rehashing the origin story
Yeah, but weren't the San Fran years just a bunch of one shot stories, rather then an ongoing story? I'm not sure how you would make a whole movie about DD and Black Widow moving to San Fran, fighting random super villains. Which story from the San Fran years would make the back bone of the story, who would be the villain?
The Purple Man or The Owl.