Discussion: Gay Rights II

I would argue with you but it's hard to when I'm on your side.
Ha ha. The argument was aimed at those I-hate-gays-cuz-the-Bible-told-me-to types. They need to come up with a better argument than basing their views on a book that is pro slavery.
 
I would argue with you but it's hard to when I'm on your side.
Ha ha. The argument was aimed at those I-hate-gays-cuz-the-Bible-told-me-to types. They need to come up with a better argument than basing their views on a book that is pro slavery.
 
I would argue with you but it's hard to when I'm on your side.
Ha ha. The argument was aimed at those I-hate-gays-cuz-the-Bible-told-me-to types. They need to come up with a better argument than basing their views on a book that is pro slavery.
 
But guys, consider this.

Sin is merely the process of recognising the imperfections we perceive to have within ourselves.

Sin thus is the act of the process itself.

So, how is it sin again?

Jesus, for instance, saved those in sin or in imperfection because he saw that they needed to be saved from such because they saw it necessary, not because Jesus saw it so.

Ultimately, sin is the recognition of the PROCESS of imperfection (limitation) itself, not the source or endgame or even perception of it.

But yeah, we humans get mixed up with technicalities like that. Tsk, how silly of us.
 
But guys, consider this.

Sin is merely the process of recognising the imperfections we perceive to have within ourselves.

Sin thus is the act of the process itself.

So, how is it sin again?

Jesus, for instance, saved those in sin or in imperfection because he saw that they needed to be saved from such because they saw it necessary, not because Jesus saw it so.

Ultimately, sin is the recognition of the PROCESS of imperfection (limitation) itself, not the source or endgame or even perception of it.

But yeah, we humans get mixed up with technicalities like that. Tsk, how silly of us.
 
But guys, consider this.

Sin is merely the process of recognising the imperfections we perceive to have within ourselves.

Sin thus is the act of the process itself.

So, how is it sin again?

Jesus, for instance, saved those in sin or in imperfection because he saw that they needed to be saved from such because they saw it necessary, not because Jesus saw it so.

Ultimately, sin is the recognition of the PROCESS of imperfection (limitation) itself, not the source or endgame or even perception of it.

But yeah, we humans get mixed up with technicalities like that. Tsk, how silly of us.
 
It's a slippery slope lubricated down with Easy Glide...
 
It's a slippery slope lubricated down with Easy Glide...
 
It's a slippery slope lubricated down with Easy Glide...
 
I usually say 'That's what she said', so it was different enough for me.:o
Now give me my iPod mini!:cmad:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"