• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

🌎 Discussion: Civil Rights, Affirmative Action, Critical Race Theory, Systemic Inequality, and Racism - Part 4

World News
I would want to keep that terrorist story in the Top 5. This has gone on for too long. They're obsessed with the Smollett story, but Trump's rhetoric is causing real damage and it can't be ignored or brushed aside.
 

A plot to murder staff members at CNN doesn't even make the top 5.

But hey, a celebrity filing a false police report is more important. And...algae?

To be fair, these are all stories that are still "developing". They caught the Coast Guard guy so at this point it's not an immediate story.
 
What I don't like, and also posted as such, is when certain types of folks take a few instances of staged racial violence and try to extrapolate that there are a 'great number' and a 'whole bunch' of these types of incidents, and that racial violence is comparable to before that time certain types of folks thought having a white supremacist in the White House was a super idea.


That's precisely what the left does with the real ones, though. "Attacks have happened, so they're epidemic & not localized, they've gone up even though they haven't, a red hat is the same thing as KKK robes".

Then there are instances of the other side running with a narrative regarding the fake ones, the extremists claiming because multiple have been faked they all must be.

Both of these positions are equally rabid-salivating conformation-bias-fueled irrationality. Attacks have been real. Attacks have been faked. We have no way to determine which whenever a new one is reported, so basically sit back, wait for the cops to draw a conclusion. Don't say **** in support of either outcome in the meantime.

Smollet, approached as a single incident, got the benefit of the doubt in spades, I don't think anyone could argue that he didn't. The cops were treating him as a victim until the 11th hour when the guys rolled on him, he got the media coverage he was so antsy for, the attention, the genuine sympathy from most. It's a little rich for people to be complaining about people making assumptions on these attacks being fabricated in the wake & context of one that...was. That's on him, not the right - don't fake an attack in the first place, maybe.
 
Bullcrap. Racial violence perpetuated by white supremacists have increased since our garbage president slithered into the White House. It is verifiable by any number of non fake news sources. You have to be willfully ignorant to not acknowledge that fact.
 
To be fair, these are all stories that are still "developing". They caught the Coast Guard guy so at this point it's not an immediate story.

Planning to do something is less attention grabbing than to have actually done something.
 
Bullcrap. Racial violence perpetuated by white supremacists have increased since our garbage president slithered into the White House. It is verifiable by any number of non fake news sources. You have to be willfully ignorant to not acknowledge that fact.


Well, this comes off as rational and without a chip on your shoulder. Heh. "Garbage", "Slithered", that'd get you an editorial gig at Vox or something.

That FBI data says there was an increase of 17% in reported hate crimes, Trump's first year. That's it, we don't have substantiation on which were real, which were false, whether people are just reporting them more (which doesn't necessarily mean more are happening, just that people aren't doing the whole snitches-get-stiches-so-keep-quiet thing - which is of course good). We don't know who the accused perpetrators are, keep in mind that 17% is going to include attacks by those on the left too, not just the assumed convenience of it all being big mean honkeys in red hats.

The headines aren't necessarily the whole picture.
 
Well, this comes off as rational and without a chip on your shoulder. Heh. "Garbage", "Slithered", that'd get you an editorial gig at Vox or something.

i fully admit to maintaining a chip when it comes to the racist, treasonous, fascist leaning, journalist threatening, domestic terror supporting career con man leading this nation. But I admit no irrationality in said position. I will, however, admit to personal devastation resulting from your brutal Vox take down. Well played, good sir!


That FBI data says there was an increase of 17% in reported hate crimes, Trump's first year. That's it, we don't have substantiation on which were real, which were false, whether people are just reporting them more (which doesn't necessarily mean more are happening, just that people aren't doing the whole snitches-get-stiches-so-keep-quiet thing - which is of course good). We don't know who the accused perpetrators are, keep in mind that 17% is going to include attacks by those on the left too, not just the assumed convenience of it all being big mean honkeys in red hats.

The headines aren't necessarily the whole picture.

The Southern Poverty Law Center reported just this week that the number of hate groups hit a 20 year high, with a 7% increase in the last year alone. But it seems that you, like far too many of our fellow Americans, simply don't care.
 
The Southern Poverty Law Center. Yeah, 'cause they don't have skin in the game or anything, bwaha.

Go by the Feds, the cop data, the career civil servants who were there before the presidency was even a glimmer in Orange One's eye. The SPLC has an interest in creating this hysteria, they always have, it's their whole bread & butter.

No, I don't care about data from the SPLC, you're right there. That's like asking the ACLU if pople's civil liberties are infringed on a daily basis in epidemic proportions. What're they gonna say, 'no'?
 
So, go with the guvmint data? The folks who have zero skin in the game or any interest in downplaying this data? Or any desire to conceal hate group membership among their rank and file?

I'll stick with SPLC.
 
The Southern Poverty Law Center has lost all credibility
By Marc A. Thiessen

June 22, 2018 at 8:00 AM

After years of smearing good people with false charges of bigotry, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) has finally been held to account. A former Islamic radical named Maajid Nawaz sued the center for including him in its bogus “Field Guide to Anti-Muslim Extremists,” and this week the SPLC agreed to pay him a $3.375 million settlement and issued a public apology.

The SPLC is a once-storied organization that did important work filing civil rights lawsuits against the Ku Klux Klan in the 1970s. But it has become a caricature of itself, labeling virtually anyone who does not fall in line with its left-wing ideology an “extremist” or “hate group.”

Nawaz is a case in point. Since abandoning Islamic radicalism, he has advised three British prime ministers and created the Quilliam Foundation, to fight extremism. He is not anti-Muslim. He is a Muslim and has argued that “Islam is a religion of peace.”

So how did he end up in the SPLC’s pseudo-guide to anti-Muslim bigots? His crime, apparently, is that he has become a leading critic of the radical Islamist ideology he once embraced. Thanks to his courage, the SPLC has been forced to pay a multimillion-dollar penalty and acknowledge in a statement that it was “wrong” and that Nawaz has “made valuable and important contributions to public discourse, including by promoting pluralism and condemning both anti-Muslim bigotry and Islamist extremism.”

Let’s hope this settlement is the first of many, because this is not the first time the SPLC has done this. In 2010, it placed the Family Research Council (FRC) — a conservative Christian advocacy group that opposes abortion and same-sex marriage — on its “hate map.” Two years later, a gunman walked into the FRC headquarters with the intention to “kill as many as possible and smear the Chick-fil-A sandwiches in victims’ faces.” He told the FBI that he had used the SPLC website to pick his target.

Unfortunately, many in the media still take the SPLC seriously. Last year, ABC News ran a story headlined: “Jeff Sessions addresses ‘anti-LGBT hate group,’ ” in which it reported that “Sessions addressed members of the Alliance Defending Freedom, which was designated an ‘anti-LGBT hate group’ by the Southern Poverty Law Center in 2016.” The Alliance Defending Freedom is a respected organization of conservative lawyers dedicated to defending religious liberty, and it just argued a case before the Supreme Court, Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission. It won, 7 to 2. It is not a “hate group.” If anything, it is fighting anti-Christian hate.

In 2014, the SPLC placed Ben Carson — later a Republican presidential candidate and now the current secretary of housing and urban development — on its “extremist watch list,” alongside neo-Nazis and white supremacists. After an uproar, the group removed him and apologized.

The SPLC also lists Charles Murray, a colleague of mine at the American Enterprise Institute and one of the most respected conservative intellectuals in the United States, on its website as a “White Nationalist.” Last year, an angry mob of students, many citing the SPLC’s designation, physically attacked Murray during a speech at Middlebury College. He escaped unharmed, but the liberal professor who invited him ended up in the hospital.

Little wonder that Nawaz was not just angry but also afraid about being designated an extremist by the SPLC. He told the Atlantic in 2016, “They put a target on my head. The kind of work that I do, if you tell the wrong kind of Muslims that I’m an extremist, then that means I’m a target.”

Unfortunately, the settlement that the SPLC reached with Nawaz is not likely to deter it from smearing others — $3.4 million is a drop in the bucket for the center, which raised$132 million between November 2016 and October 2017 and has a $477 million endowment, including a reported $92 million in offshore accounts. Sliming conservatives is big business.

The only way to stop the SPLC is if people stop giving it money and the media stop quoting it or taking it seriously. The SPLC once did important work fighting the Ku Klux Klan. But when it declares Maajid Nawaz, the Family Research Council, Ben Carson and Charles Murray as moral equivalents of the Klan, it loses all integrity and credibility.

Easy to claim hate groups are on the rise when your definition of such is so broad. Give them a donation if you're really sticking with them, they can send to their offshore account. Lol
 
Right wing violence is on the rise. Studies have shown that two thirds of US terrorism is tied to right wing extremism. Right wing extremism is up up from 6% in 2000, to 35% today.

Folks can dance around this all they want. But it's not a stretch to say that our crazy right wing leader who says crazy crap all the time is emboldening these red hat lunatics to be violent.

And if you're talking about right wing crazies... what is usually the source of their craziness? Animosity towards minorities. That's what this white supremacist guy was a ll about. That's what most of them are about. Racial hate.
 
The Southern Poverty Law Center has lost all credibility
By Marc A. Thiessen

June 22, 2018 at 8:00 AM

After years of smearing good people with false charges of bigotry, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) has finally been held to account. A former Islamic radical named Maajid Nawaz sued the center for including him in its bogus “Field Guide to Anti-Muslim Extremists,” and this week the SPLC agreed to pay him a $3.375 million settlement and issued a public apology.

The SPLC is a once-storied organization that did important work filing civil rights lawsuits against the Ku Klux Klan in the 1970s. But it has become a caricature of itself, labeling virtually anyone who does not fall in line with its left-wing ideology an “extremist” or “hate group.”

Nawaz is a case in point. Since abandoning Islamic radicalism, he has advised three British prime ministers and created the Quilliam Foundation, to fight extremism. He is not anti-Muslim. He is a Muslim and has argued that “Islam is a religion of peace.”

So how did he end up in the SPLC’s pseudo-guide to anti-Muslim bigots? His crime, apparently, is that he has become a leading critic of the radical Islamist ideology he once embraced. Thanks to his courage, the SPLC has been forced to pay a multimillion-dollar penalty and acknowledge in a statement that it was “wrong” and that Nawaz has “made valuable and important contributions to public discourse, including by promoting pluralism and condemning both anti-Muslim bigotry and Islamist extremism.”

Let’s hope this settlement is the first of many, because this is not the first time the SPLC has done this. In 2010, it placed the Family Research Council (FRC) — a conservative Christian advocacy group that opposes abortion and same-sex marriage — on its “hate map.” Two years later, a gunman walked into the FRC headquarters with the intention to “kill as many as possible and smear the Chick-fil-A sandwiches in victims’ faces.” He told the FBI that he had used the SPLC website to pick his target.

Unfortunately, many in the media still take the SPLC seriously. Last year, ABC News ran a story headlined: “Jeff Sessions addresses ‘anti-LGBT hate group,’ ” in which it reported that “Sessions addressed members of the Alliance Defending Freedom, which was designated an ‘anti-LGBT hate group’ by the Southern Poverty Law Center in 2016.” The Alliance Defending Freedom is a respected organization of conservative lawyers dedicated to defending religious liberty, and it just argued a case before the Supreme Court, Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission. It won, 7 to 2. It is not a “hate group.” If anything, it is fighting anti-Christian hate.

In 2014, the SPLC placed Ben Carson — later a Republican presidential candidate and now the current secretary of housing and urban development — on its “extremist watch list,” alongside neo-Nazis and white supremacists. After an uproar, the group removed him and apologized.

The SPLC also lists Charles Murray, a colleague of mine at the American Enterprise Institute and one of the most respected conservative intellectuals in the United States, on its website as a “White Nationalist.” Last year, an angry mob of students, many citing the SPLC’s designation, physically attacked Murray during a speech at Middlebury College. He escaped unharmed, but the liberal professor who invited him ended up in the hospital.

Little wonder that Nawaz was not just angry but also afraid about being designated an extremist by the SPLC. He told the Atlantic in 2016, “They put a target on my head. The kind of work that I do, if you tell the wrong kind of Muslims that I’m an extremist, then that means I’m a target.”

Unfortunately, the settlement that the SPLC reached with Nawaz is not likely to deter it from smearing others — $3.4 million is a drop in the bucket for the center, which raised$132 million between November 2016 and October 2017 and has a $477 million endowment, including a reported $92 million in offshore accounts. Sliming conservatives is big business.

The only way to stop the SPLC is if people stop giving it money and the media stop quoting it or taking it seriously. The SPLC once did important work fighting the Ku Klux Klan. But when it declares Maajid Nawaz, the Family Research Council, Ben Carson and Charles Murray as moral equivalents of the Klan, it loses all integrity and credibility.

Easy to claim hate groups are on the rise when your definition of such is so broad. Give them a donation if you're really sticking with them, they can send to their offshore account. Lol

i just took a brief look at Mr. Theissen's prior columns. Gobs of credibility with that guy!

I understand that certain types of people are much more comfortable following the ostrich approach in regard to the clear, provable increase in domestic terrorism and white supremacist violence and prefer to attack the messenger as opposed to lifting their heads from the sand. It shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone that electing a white supremacist would have this outcome.
 
One can acknowledge the demonstrable rise in hate crimes whilst still giving the side-eye to the SPLC for putting Maajid Nawaz on a list of dangerous haters.
 
Additionally, one can be disgusted by what happened at Middlebury College, and still think Charles Murray is a doddering racist crank.
 
i just took a brief look at Mr. Theissen's prior columns. Gobs of credibility with that guy!

I understand that certain types of people are much more comfortable following the ostrich approach in regard to the clear, provable increase in domestic terrorism and white supremacist violence and prefer to attack the messenger as opposed to lifting their heads from the sand. It shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone that electing a white supremacist would have this outcome.

"Attacking the messenger" is what you literally did in this post instead of addressing any of the points made by the writer. Get a better source.
 
Right wing violence is on the rise. Studies have shown that two thirds of US terrorism is tied to right wing extremism. Right wing extremism is up up from 6% in 2000, to 35% today.

Folks can dance around this all they want. But it's not a stretch to say that our crazy right wing leader who says crazy crap all the time is emboldening these red hat lunatics to be violent.

And if you're talking about right wing crazies... what is usually the source of their craziness? Animosity towards minorities. That's what this white supremacist guy was a ll about. That's what most of them are about. Racial hate.

A Google search leads to that statistic coming from a Quartz report cited by the SPLC.

SPLC-Touted Terrorism Study Casts a Wide Net to Downplay Islamic Extremism

Looking to "blow off steam," a pair of teenagers broke into the Ohio Chapel United Methodist Church near Columbus, Ind. last year to steal propane tanks. The vandals turned crosses upside down, smashed windows, and even torched a pew stored in the basement.

Non-lethal incidents like church vandalism are a far cry from the bloodshed that occurred in the shadow of the rebuilt World Trade Center onOct. 31, 2017, when ISIS-aligned Uzbek immigrant Sayfullo Saipov drove a rented pickup truck down a crowded bicycle path, killing eight people and wounding 12. Yet, a Quartz reportpublished Sept. 11 reviewing terrorist attacks in 2017 compares numerous low-level acts of vandalism to less frequent — but far more lethal — jihadist violence, to argue that most terrorist acts in the United States are motivated by right-wing extremism.

In another case included as a terrorist attack, a "small-caliber bullet" consistent with a pellet gun or air riflewas used to shoot out the windows of the Lexington-Herald Leader in Kentucky. The rooms targeted were empty at the time of the shooting, and nobody was hurt. Law enforcement investigated the incident as "criminal mischief," and GTD researchers expressed doubt that it qualified as terrorism since "it is unclear whether the building was specifically or randomly targeted."


Quartz's conclusions are heavily skewed by arson-related incidents, which comprise 37 percent of the total terrorism cases. Half of all the attacks attributed to "anti-Muslim extremists," and half of the "anti-LGBT" incidents it includes involved fires. Thirteen of these arsons remain unsolved.

For instance, two months after a fire destroyed the Islamic Center of Lake Travis, Texas, Fire Marshal Tony Callaway admitted that investigators may never know what caused the blaze. Although Callaway pointed to local trash fires as a potential cause, the incident was still reported as coming from "anti-Muslim extremists.

In another example, there is no evidence proving that an arson attack on a Puerto Rican gay bar was motivated by homophobia or right-wing extremism. After masked assailants threw a Molotov cocktail into the Circo bar in San Juan a year ago, causing minor damage, local LGBT activist Pedro Julio Serrano identified homophobia as the "probable" cause. Authorities never identified a suspect or motive, however, and a source told the Gay Times that "the attack could have come from a rival gay club that would have wanted to stop Circo Bar from opening" following renovations. Even the GTD isn't sure that this was a terrorist attack, because the incident may not have been "aimed at attaining a political, economic, religious, or social goal."

Again, Quartz counted this arson that left no casualties equally to the ISIS-inspired Bangladeshi man who strapped a crude bomb to his body and detonated it inside a commuter tunnel at Manhattan's Port Authority Bus Terminal, wounding himself and three others. Upset over U.S. military strikes on ISIS positions and the Israeli "incursion into Gaza," Akayed Ullah timed his attack to maximize casualties. Fortunately, his suicide vest misfired and detonated prematurely, sparing numerous casualties.

It's certainly possible that the Circo bar was targeted by someone who hates gay people. But that remains unknown. In nearly a quarter of the cases in the GTD between 2010 and 2016, the perpetrator's identity is unknown. The 2017 data has mystery assailants in 29 percent of the cases, making conclusions about motive uncertain.

The same is true for the lone anti-Semitic attack featured in the database. It involved an unidentified man who set fire to an empty bus decorated with colorful artwork and Jewish iconography. The crime took place in New York's Crown Heights area, which has a history of black and Hispanic anti-Semitism. Nonetheless, Quartz counts this as a right-wing attack.



Tunisian national Abor Ftouhi's stabbing attack of a Michigan police officer may be the most dubious in the Quartz report. Ftouhi shouted "Allahu Akbar" as he stabbed the officer in the neck. He "exclaimed something similar to, 'you have killed people in Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan, and we are all going to die,'" said a second law enforcement officer who witnessed the attack. Despite these statements, Quartz characterizes this incident as an anti-government/right wing attack.

An unidentified person (so no motive) shoots the windows out of a unoccupied building of a Kentucky Newspaper and Quartz counts this as right wing extremism in comparison to the man who ran down people in a pickup truck in the name of ISIS. Your study is horribly flawed.
 
A Google search leads to that statistic coming from a Quartz report cited by the SPLC.

SPLC-Touted Terrorism Study Casts a Wide Net to Downplay Islamic Extremism

Looking to "blow off steam," a pair of teenagers broke into the Ohio Chapel United Methodist Church near Columbus, Ind. last year to steal propane tanks. The vandals turned crosses upside down, smashed windows, and even torched a pew stored in the basement.

Non-lethal incidents like church vandalism are a far cry from the bloodshed that occurred in the shadow of the rebuilt World Trade Center onOct. 31, 2017, when ISIS-aligned Uzbek immigrant Sayfullo Saipov drove a rented pickup truck down a crowded bicycle path, killing eight people and wounding 12. Yet, a Quartz reportpublished Sept. 11 reviewing terrorist attacks in 2017 compares numerous low-level acts of vandalism to less frequent — but far more lethal — jihadist violence, to argue that most terrorist acts in the United States are motivated by right-wing extremism.

In another case included as a terrorist attack, a "small-caliber bullet" consistent with a pellet gun or air riflewas used to shoot out the windows of the Lexington-Herald Leader in Kentucky. The rooms targeted were empty at the time of the shooting, and nobody was hurt. Law enforcement investigated the incident as "criminal mischief," and GTD researchers expressed doubt that it qualified as terrorism since "it is unclear whether the building was specifically or randomly targeted."


Quartz's conclusions are heavily skewed by arson-related incidents, which comprise 37 percent of the total terrorism cases. Half of all the attacks attributed to "anti-Muslim extremists," and half of the "anti-LGBT" incidents it includes involved fires. Thirteen of these arsons remain unsolved.

For instance, two months after a fire destroyed the Islamic Center of Lake Travis, Texas, Fire Marshal Tony Callaway admitted that investigators may never know what caused the blaze. Although Callaway pointed to local trash fires as a potential cause, the incident was still reported as coming from "anti-Muslim extremists.

In another example, there is no evidence proving that an arson attack on a Puerto Rican gay bar was motivated by homophobia or right-wing extremism. After masked assailants threw a Molotov cocktail into the Circo bar in San Juan a year ago, causing minor damage, local LGBT activist Pedro Julio Serrano identified homophobia as the "probable" cause. Authorities never identified a suspect or motive, however, and a source told the Gay Times that "the attack could have come from a rival gay club that would have wanted to stop Circo Bar from opening" following renovations. Even the GTD isn't sure that this was a terrorist attack, because the incident may not have been "aimed at attaining a political, economic, religious, or social goal."

Again, Quartz counted this arson that left no casualties equally to the ISIS-inspired Bangladeshi man who strapped a crude bomb to his body and detonated it inside a commuter tunnel at Manhattan's Port Authority Bus Terminal, wounding himself and three others. Upset over U.S. military strikes on ISIS positions and the Israeli "incursion into Gaza," Akayed Ullah timed his attack to maximize casualties. Fortunately, his suicide vest misfired and detonated prematurely, sparing numerous casualties.

It's certainly possible that the Circo bar was targeted by someone who hates gay people. But that remains unknown. In nearly a quarter of the cases in the GTD between 2010 and 2016, the perpetrator's identity is unknown. The 2017 data has mystery assailants in 29 percent of the cases, making conclusions about motive uncertain.

The same is true for the lone anti-Semitic attack featured in the database. It involved an unidentified man who set fire to an empty bus decorated with colorful artwork and Jewish iconography. The crime took place in New York's Crown Heights area, which has a history of black and Hispanic anti-Semitism. Nonetheless, Quartz counts this as a right-wing attack.



Tunisian national Abor Ftouhi's stabbing attack of a Michigan police officer may be the most dubious in the Quartz report. Ftouhi shouted "Allahu Akbar" as he stabbed the officer in the neck. He "exclaimed something similar to, 'you have killed people in Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan, and we are all going to die,'" said a second law enforcement officer who witnessed the attack. Despite these statements, Quartz characterizes this incident as an anti-government/right wing attack.

An unidentified person (so no motive) shoots the windows out of a unoccupied building of a Kentucky Newspaper and Quartz counts this as right wing extremism in comparison to the man who ran down people in a pickup truck in the name of ISIS. Your study is horribly flawed.


There are several studies on this issue.

Right-wing violence rising in the U.S.

HOT BLAST: A deep dive on the rise of right-wing violence in America

The rising salience of right-wing terrorism

The Rise of Far-Right Extremism in the United States

https://fas.org/irp/eprint/rightwing.pdf

Ranks of Notorious Hate Group Include Active-Duty Military — ProPublica

https://psmag.com/news/the-real-threat-at-home

It seems like you really want this to rest on a definitional issue. What is terrorism... what's worse.. a knife attack or a pipe bomb.. that sort of thing. And we can have that argument, which asks if Islamic terrorism is qualitatively worse than right wing terrorism. That's fine.. and a worthwhile debate to have.

But it's not the one we are having here. Whether it be beating up a guy on the street, or shooting people down from a hotel room... there is more right wing violence today than there was 10 years ago. Right wing terrorism is on the rise. Left wing terrorism has been on the decline since the 70s.

I'm certainly not convinced that right wing terrorism is more prone to being mislabeled than left wing terrorism. Left wing terrorism or Jihadi terrorism could be just as prone to being misidentified as your anecdotal examples.

A lot of your info is pulled directly from The Investigative Project on Terrorism. A project started by Steven Emerson. Like others have said, Steven Emerson is a returning guest on Fox News.. he's an ideological hardliner when it comes to foreign policy, and he's considered by many to be Alt Right.
This is from FAIR.org: “A closer look at Emerson’s career suggests his priority is not so much news as it is an unrelenting attack against Arabs and Muslims.”
 

From the New York Times article you posted,

Hate crime reports increased 17 percent last year from 2016, the F.B.I. said on Tuesday, rising for the third consecutive year as heated racial rhetoric and actions have come to dominate the news.

Reporting hate crimes to the F.B.I. is currently voluntary. Last year, roughly a thousand more agencies submitted data than those that did the previous year.

More law enforcement agencies are reporting hate crimes, hence the increased number. That itself doesn't mean there were more hate crimes in recent years than in previous years.

No idea why you cited that article about Delaware. 15 reported hate crimes in 2016, which tied with 2011, down from 20 in 2010. So no increase from 6-7 years ago.

Also, good to see you abandon the SPLC. :up:
 
Bingo. ^

Personally I'm not even saying personally that's the reason (they're just being reported more, not kept quiet), but that's what the NYT article there seems to be getting at. They've just expanded the apparatus for reporting them and more organizations are involved.

Just "reported hate crimes rose", that's unhelpful on its own without the parameters. There's also nothing indicating who's perpetrating them, these numbers include both sides of the aisle, it's just an overall broad stat. You'd have to do a deep dive into the nitty-gritty of which piece of the pie is who, and we don't have that info.

But that's not an easy "red hats = KKK!" headline, so...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"