So-so? More like great-great.
Hey, I'm just being honest. This is coming from one of the biggest overall Hannibal Lecter fans you'll find. Read each book at least twice, have seen every film, and have thoroughly enjoyed this TV adaptation thus far. My criticism isn't "OH THIS SHOW SUCKS NOW"...it's constructive.
I like most of the elements at play here, especially through the first bunch of episodes when it was all new and fresh. The show had a groove that I was totally into. But you gotta admit, certain important story aspects just keep popping in and out at random. It's frustrating because you become excited or intrigued by one element, and then have to wait weeks to find out more about it.
Examples:
Abigail Hobbs - Someone who has been hailed as an essential character to this story, someone both Will and Hannibal seemed to care so much about, and yet she popped in and out of the season at random, missing for multiple episodes at a time. I know she'll most likely feature heavily in these last 2 episodes, but it's difficult to connect or care about about a character who isn't as integral to the story as she could be.
Garret Jacob Hobbs/deer - Since he was actually a character from Red Dragon, I'm glad his death was included as a part of Will's story. However, early in the season, Will couldn't shake the image of Hobbs. Then, for a few episodes, Will's fine. Last episode, he haunted Will again and almost drove him mad. Same goes for the deer imagery.
Jack Crawford's wife, Bella - She was featured in maybe 2 episodes, one of which was nearly completely focused on her terminal illness. She hasn't appeared or been mentioned since. Almost seems like a waste of an episode and screentime looking back, doesn't it? Not sure if all of you are aware, but in Silence of the Lambs (the book), Jack is under a huge burden since he has to both care for his terminally ill wife at home and lead the 'Buffalo Bill' investigation at the same time. I'm assuming Fuller is planning on focusing more on her terminal illness when they reach that point in the 'Hannibal timeline', but to introduce her illness now with such little purpose and attention was a waste, IMO.
Procedural aspect - I get it. Hannibal is on NBC and it's a show about the FBI, so it must have procedural elements and storylines, but even that balance seems uneven. We have episodes that feel like a more adult/cinematic CSI, in which a brutal killer is investigated and eventually caught. Then, there are sometimes episodes in which there are little more than conversations between characters that hardly advance the overall plot of the show. I think they can find a way to keep the procedural aspect going, while also keeping the momentum of the season moving along a little more effectively than it has this season.
That's just off the top of my head. I love the show to death and would never miss an episode, but I know there's room for improvement. Most TV shows (especially on network TV) really find their groove in the second season, and I'm assuming Hannibal will come back even stronger than ever. I hate to compare this show to another show about a serial killer, but Hannibal could learn a lesson or two from Dexter, a show with many characters (including multiple adversaries per season), many subplots, and dark themes. No, I don't want Hannibal to copy Dexter, but Dexter's best seasons have had strong momentums and a clear focus.