insider1970
Civilian
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2010
- Messages
- 311
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 36
Some anonymous wrote this at another site about the MGM-Lifetime *beep* (of course, it's anonymous and there isn't a single source, so beware and take this with a grain of salt):
Does anybody understand -in case it's true- if this would actually turn to be a good thing for Fuller if they still want the rights? I'm confused
(because to me doesn't sound good-even if they don't proceed with the show, maybe they'll have a spite against Fuller)
They've been wanting to do a Clarice spin-off for AGES and never been able to get a network to greenlight it, especially after Lifetime bought the rights and then sat on them, supposedly because Gillian Anderson told them to *beep* off when they approached her back during Gillian's "death to america" period when she lived in the UK and refused to do US TV in the 00s
So when Hannibal first aired, MGM were all *****y about not letting Fuller use Clarice in future seasons but then got pissy when he went public with this AND Hannibal proved to be a financially viable show, making MGM pissy because not only did it hurt their chances to do a Clarice spin-off themselves, it meant they had ZERO leverage to get the Hannibal Lecter TV rights themselves for their show. So they are suing Lifetime to punish them for dragging their feet and allowing Fuller to get his show on the air first
Does anybody understand -in case it's true- if this would actually turn to be a good thing for Fuller if they still want the rights? I'm confused
