warhorse78
Sidekick
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2011
- Messages
- 3,472
- Reaction score
- 132
- Points
- 73
Answer to your Thor question
Nope, not really, he does it in the final battle but you're too upset to care at that point. What they did to Thor in this counts as one of the biggest crimes this movie commits and all the good the Russos did with the character in IW is undone, just like that, with the snap of a finger. But I guess some people got their few chuckles in.[/spoilers
I agree with this 100 percent. His whole transformation left me flabbergasted. I can't help but feel to me that those in power have decided to build up a certain character as the best ever, had to do that by destroying old fan favorites. I am a typical woman who likes to go to these movies to see the hunky guys, and so they took that away from me with Thor, who was absolutely beautiful to look at in his previous movies.
Funny enough, as much as the MCU is trying to act all "woke", I bet they would never allow one of their female characters to become fat slobs. Then to add insult to injury with the character, he ends up having a mom complex, and then gives away his crown to Valkerie, and then to become a servant to the GOTG. This is what has become of the almighty Thor, in a nutshell. Once one of the most powerful, wisest and endearing characters in the MCU, and is now just another face in the crowd. 
		
Yep, agree with you here. Sorry, there is no brotherly love between the two, and I felt nothing was resolved. Sure, Steve gets his shield back, but then it breaks. And what happened to his shield he got from T'Challa? It's like the whole movie completely forgets about Wakanda and how the Black Panther movie breathed new life into the franchise.Answer to your Cap/Tony question
Nope, I really don't think so. There's this weird messing about with time in the story telling where the movie starts, Tony gets back to Earth in the first couple minutes, then they find Thanos, go there, take his head off (like THE actual Thanos from IW, killed in a shack while cooking food) Tony is pissed off at Cap for Civil War still and then we jump to 5 years later and the rest of the movie continues with a Thanos from the past and Tony decides to help them and be nice again because they... asked him? Again? I guess. With real serious faces this time. After that he's friends with Cap again. No arc, no nothing.
Answer to your Thanos question
The Thanos from the first film is gone. Like literally and figuratively. What happens to him within the first 5 minutes of the movie is just so weird that you spend the rest of the movie thinking "Wait... we're getting THAT Thanos back right?" Which never happens and then on a more meta level I guess you're thinking "Are we gonna get the badass Josh Brolin Thanos back atleast?" And then that never really happens either. In this movie he's back to being just another generic bad guy who wants to collect the stones because it's the Thanos from the past, not the one who fought them in IW.
My friends were like, he goes from killing half the world, to being a farmer cooking food in a shack?
It makes me wonder too about who really made this movie. It screams of massive studio interference. The potential for a great movie was there, but it dropped the ball. I left the theater disappointed and angry at how my favorite characters were treated in the end, and the whole time travel has me wonder what exists and doesn't anymore. What Steve did in the end wasn't beautiful on his part, it was selfish. So, we now have what, 4 Steve Rogers running around the time paradox? The more I think about it, the more convoluted the whole thing is. I was expecting a plot similar to Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, but, without a doubt, HP did a far superior job on the subject.I left thinking "Did the Russo's even actually make this movie?" Honestly I don't think so. But I mean, maybe. I didn't much like Civil War either but it was waaay better than this.
If the audience I was with is any indication I can guarantee that it will be very mixed. I lost count of how many stupid moments there were in this. It is one of the strangest movies I've seen in a long time and not in a good way and it was very visible with the audience.
People sighing and getting bored halfway through, checking their phones, having a general "WTF?" vibe about them, not responding to moments that I guess were supposed to be those fist pumping "Eff Yeah!" scenes.
This movie was just not it and it'll become more clear in the coming days.
I had planned to watch this movie with my less hardcore CBM friends on Friday, I agreed to that but couldn't wait and went ASAP. I am really dreading having to sit through all that again on Friday. Compare that to the first Avengers and Infinity War which were both so well crafted I watched them in the cinema about 5 times each.
Take that as you will.
Agreed here. Now, I can sit through a long movie. I was in a LOTR marathon where I sat through every single movie, and each one an extended edition, and to this day, I will continue to go see them when they come to the theaters because the movies are just beautifully filmed. The attention to the detail, the story, the characters. I still cry at the end when Aragorn tells the hobbits they bow to no one. I felt there was none of this in EG. There was no build up, there was no heart. I didn't cry during the "emotional" scenes because they were more or less, just rehashes of stuff we already seen. Even the same music played in one scene, and the whole thing felt corny and forced.
This doesn't feel like a Russo movie. The dialogue was terrible, scenes were corny and cringe worthy, and our original heroes didn't go out with a bang, but more or less, a whimper to make room for the new heroes.
 
				 
						
 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		
 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		