Serene said:How cool is it that my two favorite SV reviewers post here?
![]()
I think the whole "diplomatic immunity" scene was just an homage to Donner's Lethal Weapon 2. Nothing more, nothing less.Finn Mac Cool said:Triplet, about the diplomatci immunity thing, it's entirely possible that this guy was hauled in for crimes (perhaps even similar crimes) before, and been given a get-out-of-jail free, so Detective Sawyer knew detaining him wouldn't do anything more than getting him in custody for a few days.
The Incredible Hulk said:mine finally went up on Kingdom along with a cool Marsters interview
http://www.dc-kingdom.com/index.php
AllThingsComic said:This is what's great about this show, they don't insult the viewers intelligence and sometimes even let you draw your own conclusion(although they really might not have a way to explain something and count on SHH threads to form thier own,lol). In my opinion, anything that has this many people talking has got to be brilliant work.
NHawk19 said:I dunno that printer thing felt like an insult to me.
BTW does anyone have the shots of Clark pulling the helicopter down?
NHawk19 said:Found the image:
![]()
This really bugged me. How was he able to do this? Shouldnt he have been lifted off the ground?
Brainiac 8 said:I know, that made me laugh too. I have never seen a printer that did that.![]()
It was good for a laugh though.![]()
avidreader said:Dont to be too sure guys. I worked in an office where the printer did exactly that. It may be all in the way that its set up.
triplet said:I betcha it wasn't a small inkjet printer like that one, though, was it?
I'm most familiar with HP inkjet printers, the bastards, but I don't know of any inkjet printer that would spit out another copy like that.
Small, personal inkjet printers are line printers in that they only remember one line at a time.
Larger printers, like networkable laser printers, are page printers and probably could (dependning on how you have them set up, the type of print job that is sent down, how much built-in memory they have, and whether or not they have an internal hard drive) remember their print jobs. However, that printer was too small to be that kind of laser printer.
The only way I could see it work was if the button on the printer somehow "asks" the pc to send the last print job down again, the printer itself isn't capable of remembering a whole print job.
It was too small, IMO.
avidreader said:Your right it was a laser printer, but I thought that printer looked pretty big at least as big as the one I used to use.
I guess its enough of a possibility that I just went with it and thought that a printer was capable of doing that.
My computer geek son was watching it and he didnt say anything and he's usually really quick to pick up on stuff like that.
avidreader said:He's stronger than the helicoper tho, so him keeping himself fastened to the ground is just like a normal person pulling a kite down out of the sky. Why would he be lifted up?
NHawk19 said:Unless Clark weighed more (or distorted the stuff around him similar to flight) than the force required to lift from the ground the Helicopter, when he pulled he would move up the rope, and wouldnt have stayed put on the roof.
Serene said:If we were dealing with a human being, you would be correct. But the way I can justify it is by assuming that the SuperStrength in Clark's arms is able to exert a much greater force than that of the helicopter. So, in other words, his arm strength compensates for his lack of weight. Totally unrealistic (and I believe, physically impossible)... but we are talking Superman.![]()
Serene said:If we were dealing with a human being, you would be correct. But the way I can justify it is by assuming that the SuperStrength in Clark's arms is able to exert a much greater force than that of the helicopter. So, in other words, his arm strength compensates for his lack of weight. Totally unrealistic (and I believe, physically impossible)... but we are talking Superman.![]()
AllThingsComic said:Hawk, i'm not doubting you in any way, my thought process is that it's a fictional character from another planet who defies all the laws of this planet. It's sort of like disputing Chris Reeves catching the Helicopter with Lois in the other hand and him not being dragged down several floors. It's pointless to argue logic and reason when the character is fictional. Just my thoughts on this discussion.