Fan Review Thread SPOILERS INSIDE - Part 2

Just got back from my second viewing and it pleases me to say that the movie plays MUUUUUUUUUUCH better the second time around. I can't say enough about that.

Within this movie is potential for the best and most ambitious MCU solo adventure. What prevents it from achieving that status is as follows:

1. Unbalanced editing. Whoever was at the controls did an awful job in the first portion of the film, particularly the opening 15-20mins. There was an unnecessary rush job on the Bor prologue, which I will go on to discuss in a bit. They also spent too much time scene splicing when it didn't need it. A great example is how they spread out the Dark Elves awakening from their slumber, them arriving home on Svartelheim, and then the plan for the attack on Asgard where Alrgim agrees to become Kurse. The first two of those should've been one seamless flow together. By breaking them up it made the film seem like it was jumping around too much. Btw, how did Algrim arrive at the BiFrost site in tow with the rest of the prisoners? That was never clear in the film.

2. There are a couple completely unnecessary scenes. Remember that odd arrangement of the post-cred scene in CA:TFA? They did it again to this film. We absolutely DID NOT need to see Jane and the others eating breakfast discussing Thor not having returned yet. That scene undercut the climax (which I will also discuss my qualms with). They would've been better served showing Thor's talk with Odin/Loki and then have him show up back at Jane's apartment. There were also some terrible shots of Darcy, Selvig, and Jane running around as some of the Dark Elves were chasing them. It made the DE's look like cartoon buffoons in pursuit.

3. I said this in my original review, but they did a disservice giving the Dark Elves their own language. I understand why it was done, but it was a luxury, not a necessity. The reason people complain about not enough Malekith/Kurse and not enough development is because it's lost in having to read subtitles. You're not able to sit there focusing squarely on the characters as they're interacting and by the time Malekith speaks English we're already halfway into the film. It's almost a slight of hand because Mal/Kurse get pllllllllllenty of screen time.

4. The prologue should've been later in the film. They basically ended up rehashing the same exact story of Convergence/Aether when Jane is on Asgard as Odin begins reading from that book. It would've better served the structure of the movie if they showed the events of the Bor prologue during that book reading. It also would've been for the betterment of the film if they had given Bor a little more to do. Maybe it's just me, but in the small window of dialogue we get from him, I couldn't help but want MOAR BOR! Seriously, he had such a presence. But he only speaks a few words and then he's gone. He's too important of a character to the story for being a throwaway.

5. Marvel still needs to hire somebody who can help them take the next step with the fighting skills and choreography of their heroes. It looks like we're probably going to get it with CA:TWS, but Thor still lacks any distinction. I mean we've had three movies now of he same thing with him. He's powerful. He hits people with his hammer. He generates lightening. That all becomes a crutch. Maybe spend some of that CGI money to get somebody in there who can bring the fighting to life. That is such a huge part of what makes us geek out over these heroes. The best fight sequence in the whole movie happens during the beginning prologue. Everything else was cookie-cutter. I thought they sacrificed fighting "style" for zany capers as Thor/Malekith transport through the voids in the convergence. I was actually going to say something about seeing Thor get his face beat in by Kurse, but as I was going to type it I just realized watching Kurse pummel him like that was actually necessary. With a character like Thor, movies run the risk of suffering from the perception of his so-called "invulnerability". Btw, Kurse is probably the most hardcore villain we've had. I couldn't get enough of him, from his look to how imposing he was.

Back to the Thor/Mal fight. When Thor walked into the red mist, all would've been forgiven and people wouldn't have complained so much about the comedy lowering the stakes if we got something more creative. Instead we get Thor launching Selvig's portal spikes and then some weird running/leaping hammer hit that launches Malekith back. We already saw that kind of thing earlier in their fight as their blows would send each other long distances. I will have to say though, the "Convergence" allowed for destruction and a display of power without having to deal with the mass casualty issue recently abuzz after MoS

6. There are no memorable lines or sequences in the movie that'll etch themselves into CBM history. You'd think there'd be at least one.

So yeah, I originally gave it a 7.0/7.5 but I'm moving this up to an 8.5 .... I think other criticisms of the film are unwarranted and many of them are strictly personal wants which have nothing to do with how the film was actually executed. One of those was the love triangle some were desperate for. It's pretty clear in the film Thor doesn't feel that way about Sif, so why drag it out longer than it needs to be. They hinted at it from Sif's side and at least it leaves the door open down the line if they ever want to explore that angle in future films.

The Warriors Three have plenty to do, far more than the first, each with his own defining moment which portrays their comic book likeness ..... only person who gets shortchanged is Hogun. Nobody can argue against that. But we did get his stache finally! LOL. Heimdall got to shine, but I still want sooo much more of him, which isn't a bad thing. Albeit when the BiFrost was closed, he technically had nothing to do and should've been at the castle fighting some more. I understood all the stuff happening with the Convergence way better this time and it made more sense that there was so much discussion of it in the movie. I mean after all it's supposed to be a huge event considering it only happens once every 5,000 years.

The cinematography and SFX are top notch. Brian Tyler really brought it was his score, albeit it was a bit choppy in moments when Thor/Loki were in Svartelheim. There was more than enough serious tone in this movie once Jane arrived on Asgard, especially upon Frigga's death. Really loved seeing the lightening hit Mal' face as Thor is desperately running in to her defense. Her funeral procession was probably one of the most beautiful sequences in the entire film. I really couldn't care less if Thor wasn't wearing his helmet, such a knit picky complaint. They drove home the sadness in the musical score. Honestly, I think some of the detachment when it come to Frigga's relationship development has to do with Russo's acting. She's a little flat in delivering her lines, much like in the first film. Another thing about the "seriousness" is Marvel doesn't want it lingering for too long. I respect that because it's not that kind of film. They like you to get a little sad and then follow it up with some laughter because the movie is supposed to be fun, not depressing. Kind've like that family member at a funeral who tries to make you smile regardless of the occasion.

The Captain America cameo is worth the price of admission alone. I still can't stop laughing thinking about it. Kudos to Marvel for giving us that in such creative fashion. I really never saw it coming, though months ago Evans did an interview in which he discussed the possibility of that kind've thing.
 
Last edited:
I agree with you Rock, it was a very ambitious movie, but there were some technical problems. The editing was so sloppy. I just didn't care for Taylor's direction in the film. I'm not going to say he did a bad job, but it was just OK. Judging from the preview and the 5 min clip at the 3D showing, it looks like the Russo brothers are going to do a far better job directing than Taylor, and I couldn't dream of saying that 6 months ago.

But I do think it was a good movie, and I did really enjoy it. I wish Branagh could have had a second crack with this script, and it would have been out of the park.
 
I agree with you Rock, it was a very ambitious movie, but there were some technical problems. The editing was so sloppy. I just didn't care for Taylor's direction in the film. I'm not going to say he did a bad job, but it was just OK. Judging from the preview and the 5 min clip at the 3D showing, it looks like the Russo brothers are going to do a far better job directing than Taylor, and I couldn't dream of saying that 6 months ago.

But I do think it was a good movie, and I did really enjoy it. I wish Branagh could have had a second crack with this script, and it would have been out of the park.

See, I don't think Branaugh could've brought Asgard to life like this, but he would've brought out more in the dialogue. Taylor did a better job of making Asgard looked lived in and an open feel. The problem is the editing job like we both said. It gets the audience off to a rough start.

I went with my sister this time around and I specifically asked her what she thought of that portion of the movie and she agreed it was hard to keep up. But the rest of the movie made up for it for her. She told me it was her favorite of the sequels and why can't the others be like it. Then I asked her what about IM3 and she still said yes.

I like getting her opinion because she notices the little things when it comes to movies too.
 
What I learned throughout this thread is that people will never be satisfied. We live in a post Avengers and TDK world in which everybody wants that same level of quality for every CBM. People can't just go out and enjoy a movie without being overly and unnecessarily critical. This is how comics work. Is every single issue great? No. Most are so so and just okay, and every here and there you'll truly get something great. It's the same with these movies, we're not going to get TDK or Avengers level quality for every one of these films. I can understand not liking the villain, or the amount of humor, but a lot of the other things I've been reading are just nitpicky at it's best.
Exactly! Every person I talked to loved it. It was on its third week at my cinema and it was full! And that was 2D.
 
Loki as Steve: my balls are still jiggling with intense laughter. :lmao:
 
Just got back from my second viewing and it pleases me to say that the movie plays MUUUUUUUUUUCH better the second time around. I can't say enough about that.

Within this movie is potential for the best and most ambitious MCU solo adventure. What prevents it from achieving that status is as follows:

Excellent post, Rock. :up::up: The bolded part is 100% true. I couldn't agree more.

And your criticisms were well thought out and constructive (which is sadly rare to see). I definitely agree, especially with #1, the choppy editing in the beginning. That's the biggest criticism I have. Everything else you say makes total sense, even if it wasn't a big problem for me.
 
Just got back from my second viewing and it pleases me to say that the movie plays MUUUUUUUUUUCH better the second time around. I can't say enough about that.

Within this movie is potential for the best and most ambitious MCU solo adventure. What prevents it from achieving that status is as follows:

1. Unbalanced editing. Whoever was at the controls did an awful job in the first portion of the film, particularly the opening 15-20mins. There was an unnecessary rush job on the Bor prologue, which I will go on to discuss in a bit. They also spent too much time scene splicing when it didn't need it. A great example is how they spread out the Dark Elves awakening from their slumber, them arriving home on Svartelheim, and then the plan for the attack on Asgard where Alrgim agrees to become Kurse. The first two of those should've been one seamless flow together. By breaking them up it made the film seem like it was jumping around too much. Btw, how did Algrim arrive at the BiFrost site in tow with the rest of the prisoners? That was never clear in the film.

2. There are a couple completely unnecessary scenes. Remember that odd arrangement of the post-cred scene in CA:TFA? They did it again to this film. We absolutely DID NOT need to see Jane and the others eating breakfast discussing Thor not having returned yet. That scene undercut the climax (which I will also discuss my qualms with). They would've been better served showing Thor's talk with Odin/Loki and then have him show up back at Jane's apartment. There were also some terrible shots of Darcy, Selvig, and Jane running around as some of the Dark Elves were chasing them. It made the DE's look like cartoon buffoons in pursuit.

3. I said this in my original review, but they did a disservice giving the Dark Elves their own language. I understand why it was done, but it was a luxury, not a necessity. The reason people complain about not enough Malekith/Kurse and not enough development is because it's lost in having to read subtitles. You're not able to sit there focusing squarely on the characters as they're interacting and by the time Malekith speaks English we're already halfway into the film. It's almost a slight of hand because Mal/Kurse get pllllllllllenty of screen time.

4. The prologue should've been later in the film. They basically ended up rehashing the same exact story of Convergence/Aether when Jane is on Asgard and Odin begins reading from that book. It would've better served the structure of the movie if they showed the events of the Bor prologue during that book reading. It also would've been for the betterment of the film if they had given Bor a little more to do. Maybe it's just me, but in the small window of dialogue we get from him, I couldn't help but want MOAR BOR! Seriously, he had such a presence. But he only speaks a few words and then he's gone. He's too important of a character to the story for being a throwaway.

5. Marvel still needs to hire somebody who can help them take the next step with the fighting skills and choreography of their heroes. It looks like we're probably going to get it with CA:TWS, but Thor still lacks any distinction. I mean we've had three movies now of he same thing with him. He's powerful. He hits people with his hammer. He generates lightening. That all becomes a crutch. Maybe spend some of that CGI money to get somebody in there who can bring the fighting to life. That is such a huge part of what makes us geek out over these heroes. The best fight sequence in the whole movie happens during the beginning prologue. Everything else was cookie-cutter. I thought they sacrificed fighting "style" for zany capers as Thor/Malekith transport through the voids in the convergence. I was actually going say something about seeing Thor get his face beat in by Kurse, but as I was going to type it I just realized watching Kurse pummel him like that was actually necessary. With a character like Thor, movies run the risk of suffering from the perception of his so-called "invulnerability". Btw, Kurse is probably the most hardcore villain we've had. I couldn't get enough of him, from his look to how imposing he was.

Back to the Thor/Mal fight. When Thor walked into the red mist, all would've been forgiven and people wouldn't have complained so much about the comedy lowering the stakes if we got something more creative. Instead we get Thor launching Selvig's portal spikes and then some weird running/leaping hammer hit that launches Malekith back. We already saw that kind of thing earlier in their fight as their blows would send each other long distances. I will have to say though, the "Convergence" allowed for destruction and a display of power without having to deal with the mass casualty issue recently abuzz after MoS

6. There are no memorable lines or sequences in the movie that'll etch themselves into CBM history. You'd think there'd be at least one.

So yeah, I originally gave it a 7.0/7.5 but I'm moving this up to an 8.5 .... I think other criticisms of the film are unwarranted and many of them are strictly personal wants which have nothing to do with how the film was actually executed. One of those was the love triangle some were desperate for. It's pretty clear in the film Thor doesn't feel that way about Sif, so why drag it out longer than it needs to be. They hinted at it from Sif's side and at least it leaves the door open down the line if they ever want to explore that angle in future films.

The Warriors Three have plenty to do, far more than the first, each with his own defining moment which portrays their comic book likeness ..... only person who gets shortchanged is Hogun. Nobody can argue against that. But we did get his stache finally! LOL. Heimdall got to shine, but I still want sooo much more of him, which isn't a bad thing. Albeit when the BiFrost was closed, he technically had nothing to do and should've been at the castle fighting some more. I understood all the stuff happening with the Convergence way better this time and it made more sense that there was so much discussion of it in the movie. I mean after all it's supposed to be a huge event considering it only happens once every 5,000 years.

The cinematography and SFX are top notch. Brian Tyler really brought it was his score, albeit it was a bit choppy in moments when Thor/Loki were in Svartelheim. There was more than enough serious tone in this movie once Jane arrived on Asgard, especially upon Frigga's death. Really loved seeing the lightening hit Mal' face as Thor is desperately running in to her defense. Her funeral procession was probably one of the most beautiful sequences in the entire film. I really couldn't care less if Thor wasn't wearing his helmet, such a knit picky complaint. They drove home the sadness in the musical score. Honestly, I think some of the detachment when it come to Frigga's relationship development has to do with Russo's acting. She's a little flat in delivering her lines, much like in the first film. Another thing about the "seriousness" is Marvel doesn't want it lingering for too long. I respect that because it's not that kind of film. They like you to get a little sad and then follow it up with some laughter because the movie is supposed to be fun, not depressing. Kind've like that family member at a funeral who tries to make you smile regardless of the occasion.

The Captain America's cameo is worth the price of admission alone. I still can't stop laughing thinking about it. Kudos to Marvel for giving us that in such creative fashion. I really never saw it coming, though months ago Evans did an interview in which he discussed the possibility of that kind've thing.

QFT

You have earned many Internet points this day.
 
Thor: The Dark World


Thor: The Dark World is a step up from the first Thor film ,more seamless and without the creaks
of an origin or introduction to the world story.Chris Hemsworth as Thor has made the role his own,
i really cant see anyone in the near future portraying the Norse God.Tom Hiddleston as Loki has become
the cult MARVEL villain favorite.Stellan Skarsgård,and Kat Dennings provide some humorous moments.
The action sequences are fun,and engaging.

The downside of the film ,is it's main villain Christopher Eccleston as Malekith The ruler of the Dark Elves.
All i could think of was the weakest of the Star Trek vilains that were in the worst of the Star Trek films.
Even with all of the good things TTDW has going for it,i couldnt help but feel like i just watched a stepping stone
to the next Avenger's movie

Scale of 1-10 a 7½
 
Just got back from my second viewing and it pleases me to say that the movie plays MUUUUUUUUUUCH better the second time around. I can't say enough about that.

Nice to hear that you enjoyed it more on the second viewing. That was my experience as well.

I personally think there was plenty of good Thor action in this movie but I certainly agree that it's necessary to have Thor really put in danger against Kurse. Sure, he's only a bit groggy so he's not beaten, but he's in a really bad spot where you can actually think that he might straight up lose. That's very important with extremely durable characters.

All in all I agree with a big part of your posts, positives and negatives.
 
Just got back from my second viewing and it pleases me to say that the movie plays MUUUUUUUUUUCH better the second time around. I can't say enough about that.

Within this movie is potential for the best and most ambitious MCU solo adventure. What prevents it from achieving that status is as follows:

1. Unbalanced editing. Whoever was at the controls did an awful job in the first portion of the film, particularly the opening 15-20mins. There was an unnecessary rush job on the Bor prologue, which I will go on to discuss in a bit. They also spent too much time scene splicing when it didn't need it. A great example is how they spread out the Dark Elves awakening from their slumber, them arriving home on Svartelheim, and then the plan for the attack on Asgard where Alrgim agrees to become Kurse. The first two of those should've been one seamless flow together. By breaking them up it made the film seem like it was jumping around too much. Btw, how did Algrim arrive at the BiFrost site in tow with the rest of the prisoners? That was never clear in the film.

2. There are a couple completely unnecessary scenes. Remember that odd arrangement of the post-cred scene in CA:TFA? They did it again to this film. We absolutely DID NOT need to see Jane and the others eating breakfast discussing Thor not having returned yet. That scene undercut the climax (which I will also discuss my qualms with). They would've been better served showing Thor's talk with Odin/Loki and then have him show up back at Jane's apartment. There were also some terrible shots of Darcy, Selvig, and Jane running around as some of the Dark Elves were chasing them. It made the DE's look like cartoon buffoons in pursuit.

3. I said this in my original review, but they did a disservice giving the Dark Elves their own language. I understand why it was done, but it was a luxury, not a necessity. The reason people complain about not enough Malekith/Kurse and not enough development is because it's lost in having to read subtitles. You're not able to sit there focusing squarely on the characters as they're interacting and by the time Malekith speaks English we're already halfway into the film. It's almost a slight of hand because Mal/Kurse get pllllllllllenty of screen time.

4. The prologue should've been later in the film. They basically ended up rehashing the same exact story of Convergence/Aether when Jane is on Asgard as Odin begins reading from that book. It would've better served the structure of the movie if they showed the events of the Bor prologue during that book reading. It also would've been for the betterment of the film if they had given Bor a little more to do. Maybe it's just me, but in the small window of dialogue we get from him, I couldn't help but want MOAR BOR! Seriously, he had such a presence. But he only speaks a few words and then he's gone. He's too important of a character to the story for being a throwaway.

5. Marvel still needs to hire somebody who can help them take the next step with the fighting skills and choreography of their heroes. It looks like we're probably going to get it with CA:TWS, but Thor still lacks any distinction. I mean we've had three movies now of he same thing with him. He's powerful. He hits people with his hammer. He generates lightening. That all becomes a crutch. Maybe spend some of that CGI money to get somebody in there who can bring the fighting to life. That is such a huge part of what makes us geek out over these heroes. The best fight sequence in the whole movie happens during the beginning prologue. Everything else was cookie-cutter. I thought they sacrificed fighting "style" for zany capers as Thor/Malekith transport through the voids in the convergence. I was actually going to say something about seeing Thor get his face beat in by Kurse, but as I was going to type it I just realized watching Kurse pummel him like that was actually necessary. With a character like Thor, movies run the risk of suffering from the perception of his so-called "invulnerability". Btw, Kurse is probably the most hardcore villain we've had. I couldn't get enough of him, from his look to how imposing he was.

Back to the Thor/Mal fight. When Thor walked into the red mist, all would've been forgiven and people wouldn't have complained so much about the comedy lowering the stakes if we got something more creative. Instead we get Thor launching Selvig's portal spikes and then some weird running/leaping hammer hit that launches Malekith back. We already saw that kind of thing earlier in their fight as their blows would send each other long distances. I will have to say though, the "Convergence" allowed for destruction and a display of power without having to deal with the mass casualty issue recently abuzz after MoS

6. There are no memorable lines or sequences in the movie that'll etch themselves into CBM history. You'd think there'd be at least one.

So yeah, I originally gave it a 7.0/7.5 but I'm moving this up to an 8.5 .... I think other criticisms of the film are unwarranted and many of them are strictly personal wants which have nothing to do with how the film was actually executed. One of those was the love triangle some were desperate for. It's pretty clear in the film Thor doesn't feel that way about Sif, so why drag it out longer than it needs to be. They hinted at it from Sif's side and at least it leaves the door open down the line if they ever want to explore that angle in future films.

The Warriors Three have plenty to do, far more than the first, each with his own defining moment which portrays their comic book likeness ..... only person who gets shortchanged is Hogun. Nobody can argue against that. But we did get his stache finally! LOL. Heimdall got to shine, but I still want sooo much more of him, which isn't a bad thing. Albeit when the BiFrost was closed, he technically had nothing to do and should've been at the castle fighting some more. I understood all the stuff happening with the Convergence way better this time and it made more sense that there was so much discussion of it in the movie. I mean after all it's supposed to be a huge event considering it only happens once every 5,000 years.

The cinematography and SFX are top notch. Brian Tyler really brought it was his score, albeit it was a bit choppy in moments when Thor/Loki were in Svartelheim. There was more than enough serious tone in this movie once Jane arrived on Asgard, especially upon Frigga's death. Really loved seeing the lightening hit Mal' face as Thor is desperately running in to her defense. Her funeral procession was probably one of the most beautiful sequences in the entire film. I really couldn't care less if Thor wasn't wearing his helmet, such a knit picky complaint. They drove home the sadness in the musical score. Honestly, I think some of the detachment when it come to Frigga's relationship development has to do with Russo's acting. She's a little flat in delivering her lines, much like in the first film. Another thing about the "seriousness" is Marvel doesn't want it lingering for too long. I respect that because it's not that kind of film. They like you to get a little sad and then follow it up with some laughter because the movie is supposed to be fun, not depressing. Kind've like that family member at a funeral who tries to make you smile regardless of the occasion.

The Captain America cameo is worth the price of admission alone. I still can't stop laughing thinking about it. Kudos to Marvel for giving us that in such creative fashion. I really never saw it coming, though months ago Evans did an interview in which he discussed the possibility of that kind've thing.

Thanks for typing this up. You brought up many constructive criticisms of this movie, and while I do like it alot I also agree with many of your points regarding the weaknesses of this movie. However, I think TDW has done more rights than wrongs, and thus really deserves a much higher score from rating sites such as RT, but I think the GA will be far more positive about this movie than those film critics out there.
 
See, I don't think Branaugh could've brought Asgard to life like this, but he would've brought out more in the dialogue. Taylor did a better job of making Asgard looked lived in and an open feel. The problem is the editing job like we both said. It gets the audience off to a rough start.

I went with my sister this time around and I specifically asked her what she thought of that portion of the movie and she agreed it was hard to keep up. But the rest of the movie made up for it for her. She told me it was her favorite of the sequels and why can't the others be like it. Then I asked her what about IM3 and she still said yes.

I like getting her opinion because she notices the little things when it comes to movies too.
So the problem was interference. Lets be blunt about it.

I think too many people wanted Thor to act out of character. He knows his sorrow for his brother isn't shared and he is polite. Of course he won't chew out Selvig, especially given he knows what Loki did to him.

I think everyone is making mountains out of mole hills in regard to Thor's "lack of sadness/depression."
I didn't want Thor to sit in the corner and wallow. I wanted Thor to act like Thor. I was looking for something more akin to his reaction to when he thought Odin died in the first film. A bit of quiet introspection, with an undercurrent of rage. Then perhaps something a little more obvious when confronted with Malekith.

He offers Loki a chance for vengeance. It is suddenly Loki's driving force, and while me messes with his brother and the others, he is deadly serious about that. Thor is oddly mellow in the same position.
 
Last edited:
I didn't want Thor to sit in the corner and wallow. I wanted Thor to act like Thor. I was looking for something more akin to his reaction to when he thought Odin died in the first film. A bit of quiet introspection, with an undercurrent of rage. Then perhaps something a little more obvious when confronted with Malekith.

He offers Loki a chance for vengeance. It is suddenly Loki's driving force, and while me messes with his brother and the others, he is deadly serious about that. Thor is oddly mellow in the same position.

And we do get this scene. When he and Loki are fighting on the way to the Dark World. He and Loki argue over her death, and he even stops fighting Loki because she would have told them to stop (and was near tears). What more do you guys want? They even had a lengthy funeral scene dedicated to her death?

I think it is an unwarranted complaint.
 
So the problem was interference. Lets be blunt about it.


I didn't want Thor to sit in the corner and wallow. I wanted Thor to act like Thor. I was looking for something more akin to his reaction to when he thought Odin died in the first film. A bit of quiet introspection, with an undercurrent of rage. Then perhaps something a little more obvious when confronted with Malekith.

He offers Loki a chance for vengeance. It is suddenly Loki's driving force, and while me messes with his brother and the others, he is deadly serious about that. Thor is oddly mellow in the same position.

Thor wasn't even remotely mellow. I think you may have missed quite a few scenes.....
 
And we do get this scene. When he and Loki are fighting on the way to the Dark World. He and Loki argue over her death, and he even stops fighting Loki because she would have told them to stop (and was near tears). What more do you guys want? They even had a lengthy funeral scene dedicated to her death?

I think it is an unwarranted complaint.
Thor's outburst with Loki is a great scene, but it is also isolated. It isn't like his general mood is effected by either death. Compare it to "Thor", and how soft spoken and introspective Thor becomes after finding out about his father's "death". How he treats Erik, Jane and Darcy. He becomes more thoughtful. Then there is the problem that it is juxtaposed with a lot of odd comedy. You have the funeral, you have Loki's reaction and then you have the Erik scene. You have Thor losing his second family member within days and then we are back to the stuff through the hole, Thor showing a little jealousy, and other stuff played for laughs that don't seem to think about what has just happened.

And the entire finale is like that as well. Played more for a laugh then anything else. I feel like the type of comedy and its timing undermines the characters and plot.

It is the little expressions, the consistent flow of the narrative, where the character isn't sacrificed for the plot that makes these movies work on a more then a serviceable level. Just because Thor needs to stop Malekith doesn't mean his character needs go into autopilot. It isn't "Standard Thor must save the universe", It is "Thor who just lost his mother and brother must stop the man responsible before he destroys the universe".

It would be like if they took all the character and nuance out of the Thor and Loki confrontation at the end of the first film. If they just ignored who the characters are and the effect they have on one another and what they had done to each other over the course of the film.

I like the movie quite a bit, and considering it is more Thor with this great cast, it would have been hard for me not to. But I am looking for more then what I find is only serviceable, which I think is fair. Just because the film is in the superhero genre doesn't mean I lower my expectations. And I am not saying anyone has to look at the film the way I do or feel about it the way I do. Heck, I don't think anyone really could.

I know I am going to spend a lot of time on the couch watching it, cracking jokes and enjoying it in general with friends and family. But right now I am discussing its merits as film, which is something different to me. It is like the discussion of villains in the MCU. There seems to be a general sentiment that once we learn they don't get out of first gear, it is ok. We weren't expecting more anyways, which is completely fine. But I don't think that means I can't discuss how I don't think the villains get out of first gear either and how I feel it effects the film.

And really, it doesn't need to get past the first few post. It isn't like I am going around attempting to spread horrible propaganda against this film. Someone responds to my post and I respond back.
 
I have to disagree with everyone who says Sif and the Warriors Three got more screen time in this film. I can't agree with that because I don't think it's true, at all.

I'm thinking of all that screen time they had in Jotunheim in the first film them throughout the movie it woud cut back to them discussing Thor's banishment and them talking to Loki when he's on the throne. Let's not forget all the screen time they had when they get to Earth.

Some people did complain that they didn't get enough in The Dark World and that I do agree with.

I'm going to see the movie again in a week or two with my parents and I'm hoping I like it a bit more on second viewing.
 
Thor wasn't even remotely mellow. I think you may have missed quite a few scenes.....
I have seen Thor seething with rage and anger. I didn't see that. He has fun hanging his hammer, asking Jane about Richard, enjoying the attention from the woman on the train, etc. Compared to the Thor I have seen before, Odin and Loki, I think he is being mellow in general.
 
Thor's outburst with Loki is a great scene, but it is also isolated. It isn't like his general mood is effected by either death. Compare it to "Thor", and how soft spoken and introspective Thor becomes after finding out about his father's "death". How he treats Erik, Jane and Darcy. He becomes more thoughtful. Then there is the problem that it is juxtaposed with a lot of odd comedy. You have the funeral, you have Loki's reaction and then you have the Erik scene. You have Thor losing his second family member within days and then we are back to the stuff through the hole, Thor showing a little jealousy, and other stuff played for laughs that don't seem to think about what has just happened.

And the entire finale is like that as well. Played more for a laugh then anything else. I feel like the type of comedy and its timing undermines the characters and plot.

It is the little expressions, the consistent flow of the narrative, where the character isn't sacrificed for the plot that makes these movies work on a more then a serviceable level. Just because Thor needs to stop Malekith doesn't mean his character needs go into autopilot. It isn't "Standard Thor must save the universe", It is "Thor who just lost his mother and brother must stop the man responsible before he destroys the universe".

It would be like if they took all the character and nuance out of the Thor and Loki confrontation at the end of the first film. If they just ignored who the characters are and the effect they have on one another and what they had done to each other over the course of the film.

I like the movie quite a bit, and considering it is more Thor with this great cast, it would have been hard for me not to. But I am looking for more then what I find is only serviceable, which I think is fair. Just because the film is in the superhero genre doesn't mean I lower my expectations. And I am not saying anyone has to look at the film the way I do or feel about it the way I do. Heck, I don't think anyone really could.

I know I am going to spend a lot of time on the couch watching it, cracking jokes and enjoying it in general with friends and family. But right now I am discussing its merits as film, which is something different to me. It is like the discussion of villains in the MCU. There seems to be a general sentiment that once we learn they don't get out of first gear, it is ok. We weren't expecting more anyways, which is completely fine. But I don't think that means I can't discuss how I don't think the villains get out of first gear either and how I feel it effects the film.

And really, it doesn't need to get past the first few post. It isn't like I am going around attempting to spread horrible propaganda against this film. Someone responds to my post and I respond back.

Odin's "death" and Frigga's are not the same. When the thought Odin died, he thought it was DIRECTLY his fault. In Frigga's case, she was killed by Malekith. No matter how angry with himself he was for being a second or two late, they are still not under the same circumstances. People don't have 1 default way they handle people close to them dying. The way it happened helps dictate how we respond. In this case, Frigga died at the start of a new war by the hand of an enemy. Not by Thor's stupidity. Thus, he will not react the same way. He mourned her in the movie, and moved on. Just like his enemy would be doing, and he was concerned for his people. I think his reaction was fair.
 
I'm giving the movie a 7/10
And I'm typing this up now before it slips any further

When I first got out of the theater, I'd have said 8 out of 10, but the more the film sits in my mind, the more meaningless and unimpressive it seems. The main part of Rock's review I agree with is that there were no particular moments, whether dialogue or action, that made me really take notice. Nothing that will linger with me in the future, no moment that I can say made this one of the best Marvel films.

What it was was perfectly adequate. It was a filler issue between better comic arcs.
In essence, it was like Matt Fractions time on the Thor comic: Pretty to look at, but full of off-putting out-of-character moments, and ultimately a pretty empty experience for our hero.

I would've liked more time with the Warriors Three, more time with Heimdall, more of Thor Jane and Loki on their quest, more underhanded *****e-baggery from Odin, and most certainly more of Kurse and Malekith. This movie just needed MORE of pretty much everything, so once again, to the people who were insulting and berating those of us concerned about the runtime, I can only say EAT ME! An additional 10-15 minutes spread through those important moments would've helped flesh out the film remarkably. The movie was all rushed build up, with a mediocre and barely earned pay off.

My biggest problem was Thor, and his lack of any... I don't know.. humor, progression, joy... he had no great moments, no memorable lines, I was more impressed by Heimdall taking down the Elf ship than anything Thor did all movie. And he couldn't friggin fly, don't get me started! (the tube was funny, but c'mon, the man doesn't need his hammer to fly!)
What I would've liked to see was more court intrigue. Some said that the scenes with Bor killing Malekith's family would've made the asgardians look bad, but I think it would've been perfect. That way you get to develop and add texture to Malekith, and Thor's decision to leave at the end becomes clearer because he doesn't want to get involved in the dirty business of being a King. That's also why I think they should've shown more of Odin doing some shady stuff, So Thor can say "I can't choose between killing thousands or killing millions" and it shows he's grown even more, an he's a hero of earth, not a cold brutal king like his father.

I don't know, all in all, I thought the movie was very pretty, with some funny bits here and there and some wonderful performances from basically everyone involved. But as a huge Thor fan, I was quite disappointed at just how hollow the whole thing felt.

I hope my experience improves on repeated viewings, but we shall see....
 
Last edited:
I have to disagree with everyone who says Sif and the Warriors Three got more screen time in this film. I can't agree with that because I don't think it's true, at all.

I'm thinking of all that screen time they had in Jotunheim in the first film them throughout the movie it woud cut back to them discussing Thor's banishment and them talking to Loki when he's on the throne. Let's not forget all the screen time they had when they get to Earth.

Some people did complain that they didn't get enough in The Dark World and that I do agree with.

I'm going to see the movie again in a week or two with my parents and I'm hoping I like it a bit more on second viewing.

Watch the film again. The Warriors Three are in the majority of the Asgard scenes and that's the longest sequence in the movie.
 
Odin's "death" and Frigga's are not the same. When the thought Odin died, he thought it was DIRECTLY his fault. In Frigga's case, she was killed by Malekith. No matter how angry with himself he was for being a second or two late, they are still not under the same circumstances. People don't have 1 default way they handle people close to them dying. The way it happened helps dictate how we respond. In this case, Frigga died at the start of a new war by the hand of an enemy. Not by Thor's stupidity. Thus, he will not react the same way. He mourned her in the movie, and moved on. Just like his enemy would be doing, and he was concerned for his people. I think his reaction was fair.
I do agree circumstance matters, but he lost his mother and brother in a few days. His mother and brother. His outburst shows there is something there, but the rest of the time his demeanor does not betrayal this. Then in the aftermath, he leaves his father alone to mourn by himself and shows no real concern for their loss after the entire incident is over.

It doesn't work for me. Not when it was his mother and brother, not when he makes the decision to go to Earth while still talking about protecting all Nine Realms. Something he can't really do from Earth.

Also, the Dark Elves were there because of Thor. They were looking for Aether, and they knew it was there. He was the one that made the decision to bring Jane there and it was him to left Frigga and Jane alone, thinking it was Loki's doing.
 
Odin's "death" and Frigga's are not the same. When the thought Odin died, he thought it was DIRECTLY his fault. In Frigga's case, she was killed by Malekith. No matter how angry with himself he was for being a second or two late, they are still not under the same circumstances. People don't have 1 default way they handle people close to them dying. The way it happened helps dictate how we respond. In this case, Frigga died at the start of a new war by the hand of an enemy. Not by Thor's stupidity. Thus, he will not react the same way. He mourned her in the movie, and moved on. Just like his enemy would be doing, and he was concerned for his people. I think his reaction was fair.

Exactly. Darth keeps trying to apply this bizarre template on how to grieve ..... and judging the film by it as if its absolute.

I recommend to everyone to go watch the movie again in order to see if your criticisms hold up.
 
Watch the film again. The Warriors Three are in the majority of the Asgard scenes and that's the longest sequence in the movie.
Being in a scene is completely different from screen time. Sif and the Warriors Three are in more then a few scenes, but they are short glimpses. I think it is probably safe to saw they had more screen time and lines in their three Asgard scenes post Thor's banishment in "Thor" then all of TDW. And that isn't including the coronation, the entire Jotunheim sequence (from the table flip to Odin saving them), their search for Thor, the battle with the Destroyer and the final scene.

Exactly. Darth keeps trying to apply this bizarre template on how to grieve ..... and judging the film by it as if its absolute.
I am judging Thor by his own character and how he has handle such situations in the past. I am applying Thor logic to Thor. Don't think that is bizarre at all.
 
I am judging Thor by his own character and how he has handle such situations in the past. I am applying Thor logic to Thor. Don't think that is bizarre at all.

Which situation in the past? When he thought Odin was dead? Did you not see Thor screaming as he ran into the room with lightening a-blazing as Frigga lies lifeless on the floor? Did you not see his face as Loki appeared dead to him .... the pain from losing yet another loved one in such a short time frame? Btw in "Thor" he went from slightly tearing to more quitely grieving pretty quickly. That talk with Loki was only a few minutes long and then Selvig got him and they're in a bar.

This idea that you've determined a template of correct Thor emotional response is freaking absurd.
 
Exactly. Darth keeps trying to apply this bizarre template on how to grieve ..... and judging the film by it as if its absolute.

I recommend to everyone to go watch the movie again in order to see if your criticisms hold up.

Exactly. Odin I feel was too blinded by his own rage for Thor to confide in him, and he didn't want Jane to worry. Notice when he was alone with his brother, all his feelings came out. Loki was oddly the only one I think Thor thought he could fairly discuss this with. Hence why his feelings don't come out fully until that scene.
 
Exactly. Odin I feel was too blinded by his own rage for Thor to confide in him, and he didn't want Jane to worry. Notice when he was alone with his brother, all his feelings came out. Loki was oddly the only one I think Thor thought he could fairly discuss this with. Hence why his feelings don't come out fully until that scene.

Precisely ..... that happens all the time where people internalize the grieving and it comes out slightly later.
 
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"