AVEITWITHJAMON
Badass Cloud
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2003
- Messages
- 42,533
- Reaction score
- 8,021
- Points
- 103
Yeah I will check out the 1st season then. Thanks.![]()
No probs, if you like fantasy you will love it.
Yeah I will check out the 1st season then. Thanks.![]()
No probs, if you like fantasy you will love it.
t: I like trying out new things.I'm an open minded person.t: I like trying out new things.
Good stuff. But yeah it is an amazing show, for me, it takes a little dip in season 2, but season 3 was amazing and the best yet.

calm the heck down... don't turn this into a flame war. You can dislike a film regardless of what heroes you prefer...

Yeah I hear people say it's amazing but I never really had time to check it out. I'm ordering the first full season on blu ray as we speak.
I have had a little more time to think about Malekith and I have come to this conclusion...Malekith is actually a pretty dark villain in terms of what he does. He's played more like a King who doesn't need to get his hands dirty but he makes battle command decisions, even ones that result in a LOT of carnage and death. Could he have used more development? Absolutely, though I'm not sure I want ANOTHER villain who is only a villain because of what a hero did. Honestly, I'm tired of that. It was refreshing to have a villain whose goal seemed to be to plunge the world back into a place he could rule it.
![]()
( btw this is not aimed at you AVEITWITHJAMON, just my overall thoughts on the character)
I agree... it also gave us our first truly tragic death in the Marvel Cinematic Universe..
Russo also gave him one hell of a fight

Yeah I hear people say it's amazing but I never really had time to check it out. I'm ordering the first full season on blu ray as we speak.![]()
I have had a little more time to think about Malekith and I have come to this conclusion...Malekith is actually a pretty dark villain in terms of what he does. He's played more like a King who doesn't need to get his hands dirty but he makes battle command decisions, even ones that result in a LOT of carnage and death. Could he have used more development? Absolutely, though I'm not sure I want ANOTHER villain who is only a villain because of what a hero did. Honestly, I'm tired of that. It was refreshing to have a villain whose goal seemed to be to plunge the world back into a place he could rule it.
![]()
( btw this is not aimed at you AVEITWITHJAMON, just my overall thoughts on the character)

A question for others who have seen the movie: do you think the Loki dungeon scene with Frigga was actually him talking with her, or just him creating an illusion of her to have a made-up conversation with? Initially I thought the latter: Odin had said Frigga wouldn't visit Loki, and then the way she just vanished (like she was one of his illusions) when she said he was lying to himself sealed it for me. It all worked quite well.
But then I saw other reviews and people read the scene straight, perhaps since Frigga was later shown to be able to project an illusion of Jane. At this point, I'm not sure exactly what was meant as truth, or if it is left to the viewer to decide. I tend to prefer the Loki talking to himself interpretation honestly, since he would only admit to himself how much he cares for his mother/family (and even that would be a struggle). OTOH, he does get a last direct conversation with his mother before she dies if it is really her, which makes losing her more powerful.
Or maybe I'm just coming up with a reason to go see the film again this weekend.![]()
the Young Readers novel describes that scene and says that's a Hologram of FriggaThis movie is too straightforward to set up any ambiguous metaphorical dialogues that might accidentally give some of these characters some, well, character. The scene is meant to be played straight, like all the other illusions in the film: Frigga "visited" Loki in the dungeon via a thought/magic projection.
the Young Readers novel describes that scene and says that's a Hologram of Frigga
I would disagree with that, but I understand why someone could see it that way, given some of the movie's problems. To me, the way Kurse and Loki faced off in the cell break scene, and Kurse deciding not to let Loki out -- all without any dialogue -- was an excellent example of great characterization for Loki.This movie is too straightforward to set up any ambiguous metaphorical dialogues that might accidentally give some of these characters some, well, character.
I thought it was actually Frigga talking to Loki in the cell.An obvious set up to explain her powers of illusion.
I was left with another question (or several!)
Does Frigga have those powers in the comics?
how did Loki "inherit" those powers from Frigga? (since he's famously adopted)
If Frigga taught this magic to Loki,why didn't she teach it to Thor?
I think I remember reading somewhere that it's because of all the love and attention Odin gave Thor that Frigga wanted something special for Loki. Plus, with Thor being the older brother, it would make him first in line for the throne. Loki gets magic, Thor gets the throne.
Also, I don't think the Thor in the MCU would have interest in learning magic. He sees magic as trickery and so would focus his energy on getting stronger and being tougher as opposed to learning "tricks."
I'm not sure if I missed a line or something,but did they ever explain why Selvig was acting like a loon?I guess the events of the Avengers were too much for him?
It was funny,but I actually found myself feeling bad for the character (and the actor.)
Not that I remember. I feel they were thinking, ok now how can we make THIS character funny for the sake of it. No pants? Great. No pants on TV? Better. No pants on TV twice? Fabulous.