Franco Fearful. Dunst in trouble.

dark_b said:
but i didnt mean for me. of course she did a favor to the fans but that doesnt mean that she made the right thing. she f.. up very bad and inside we all know this.
Who the f--- cares (but Kirsten Haters :rolleyes:), we read the freakin' script summary, we would have known everything anyway--did we really want to be surprised, NO? Casual movie-goers don't follow every word these actors say about the Spider-Man movies (or read its script summary) like we do. All she did was tell us something that we would eventually know sooner or later--way before the film was released. Plus, she caused a massive BUZZ for SM3...people were talking about SM3 more than Superman Returns and X-Men 3 combined. If Kirsten didn't say a single word, the famous summary/Q & A (released by someone who works for Sony) would have told us everything from beginning to end.

And yes, we're going to know everything about SM4, way before it's released.
 
Visionary said:
Who the f--- cares (but Kirsten Haters :rolleyes:), we read the freakin' script summary, we would have known everything anyway--did we really want to be surprised, NO? Casual movie-goers don't follow every word these actors say about the Spider-Man movies (or read its script summary) like we do. All she did was tell us something that we would eventually know sooner or later--way before the film was released. Plus, she caused a massive BUZZ for SM3...people were talking about SM3 more than Superman Returns and X-Men 3 combined. If Kirsten didn't say a single word, the famous summary/Q & A (released by someone who works for Sony) would have told us everything from beginning to end.

And yes, we're going to know everything about SM4, way before it's released.

I agree, it really didn't have that big of an effect on the billions of people that are going to see this movie anyway. It's not like they're going to say "Oh, Kirsten told us EVERYTHING freakin detail about the movie, we're not going to see it." People really blow these kinds of things out of proportion. It is kinda funny that Franco is fearful of Raimi's wrath though...
 
Godzilla2000 said:
Kirsten Dunst never spoiled anything. People knew Venom would be at the end for awhile now.

I thought that avatar was banned
 
spidermanhero12 said:
kirsten is not an idiot, she did us a big favor, shes a great person.
actors and directors should keep everything a secret. so to spoil something(doing something bad to raimi) makes her a good person?

a lot of directors want to keep a lot of things as secret because they want that fans see the movie in the theater when it is finished. like harry.a lot of fans are crying about harry and the goblin. maybe they will change their mind after seeing the movie.

thats why directors want to show the final product.
 
The news is old, but the quote of Franco's is from the recent Empire interview.

I don't know why he's worried - he knows not to blab like Dunst.
 
dark_b said:
actors and directors should keep everything a secret. so to spoil something(doing something bad to raimi) makes her a good person?

a lot of directors want to keep a lot of things as secret because they want that fans see the movie in the theater when it is finished. like harry.a lot of fans are crying about harry and the goblin. maybe they will change their mind after seeing the movie.

thats why directors want to show the final product.
kirsten accidently said who the villians are, she didnt mean to.
 
yeah, i'm pretty sure. the 2 villains are sandy and venom, and the half is goblin.

remember when this first came out? and everyone said kirsten was a liar? i'm looking at you slag
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
201,823
Messages
22,032,058
Members
45,826
Latest member
Corinthian
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"