
A work of art. Call the Louvre.
I know Gareth Edwards wants to do a sequel in the vein of Destroy All Monsters.
A friend of mine was telling me that he thought this movie looked stupid because (in his opinion) it looks like the 1998 Godzilla movie.
After staring at him dumbfounded for about 10 or 20 minutes, I did my best to convince him that this movie will be nothing like that. Seriously though, how can anyone think this looks bad? Even if you don't like these types of movie... just everything here looks fantastic.
That would be all kinds of amazing!
So is G simply referred to as "the creature" or some such throughout the film? I'm wondering what kind of rationale would be in play for giving it's traditional name.
so who are the human bad guys in the film?
I notice that there is no flame breath in the trailers. I wonder if it ends up being used.
"Godzilla is battling the monster sir"
"Godzilla?"
"That's what everyone is calling him"
I honestly wonder how you make a sequel to a film like this, that doesn't either feel like a retread, or just not that special. How do you get a Empire or TDK when the first film is all about the awe and will feature monster on monster violence.I know Gareth Edwards wants to do a sequel in the vein of Destroy All Monsters.
Imax 3d