DarthSkywalker
Your Most Aggro Pal (he/him)
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2004
- Messages
- 125,138
- Reaction score
- 65,709
- Points
- 203
The opposite is used by ppl with an arrogance to try and deem their view as fact.
Arrogant? Probably. Right? Most definitely.
Actually acting is one of them, both Lazenby and Savalas are horrible in both roles, almost spooflike in their portrayals. The fights look like they came from a Carry On movie IMO so again all you are doing is touting your hard on for the movie as fact, all of which is easily debated away to mere like or dislike.
I never understood the spoof idea here with Bond. Blofield yes, but this is the man who is attempting mind control. Not the most... sound of mind. What does Lazenby do that is spooflike?
You don't recall any of the horrible cringe worthy "undercover" deliveries as Hilary saint James ?
Well it is ridiculous. Bond is never undercover. These men have already meant in this verse.
Humans have traits, thus characters have traits, if a character has a trait that is not seen regularly in other characters then they are not generic, thus you are over simplifying your reasoning.
Traits was the wrong word. My point is the idea of a henchmen who doesn't have a unique attribute whether it be a throwing hat, crushing metal teeth, or crushing legs.
Like the entire end battle in OHHMSS ?
It was Apocalypse Now before Apocalypse Now. The sled ride however... well it can't be excused. They did the best they could with a terrible finish provided by Fleming. The one major flaw I find in the film. It is OHMSS version of Star Wars' gunner sequence in ANH.