A lot of people think that, but I just don't get it. In my opinion, POA is just decent.
A lot of people think that, but I just don't get it. In my opinion, POA is just decent.
Question for Harry Potter fans. In HBP, they introduce Liquid Luck. Why didn't they just brew up a bunch of it for the fight against Voldemort? Is it something that can only be done to an extent? Did the books reference something about it that I don't know about? Just curious about this.
Because then the whole story would not make sense. It's like asking why Gandalf did not flew Frodo to Mordor on one of the giant eagles.
IT makes sense, but the story must be thrilling. It's a fiction after all.
You know I was thinking it's a real testament of this franchise when nobody can agree which is the best movie. It's not like where most SW fans agree ESB is the best one despite having other favorites, but here, I haven't seen one really pinned down as the best. I've heard the first two, the third, the fourth, the fifth, the second part of seven. I think the third is the best, but again, people will disagree with me which is great.
You know I was thinking it's a real testament of this franchise when nobody can agree which is the best movie. It's not like where most SW fans agree ESB is the best one despite having other favorites, but here, I haven't seen one really pinned down as the best. I've heard the first two, the third, the fourth, the fifth, the second part of seven. I think the third is the best, but again, people will disagree with me which is great.
The flying thing in LOTR is explainable as the eagles were meant to take them further but Gandalf was unable to call them after the Balrog fight. Or maybe there was some kind of anti-air defenses up. Weak reasoning but the story would not be very interesting otherwise.
A lot of people stand behind Prisoner of Azkaban as the best. While I agree it's a good film, Goblet of Fire might actually be my favorite of the bunch. GOF, POA and Deathly Hallows Part 2 round out my top three.