I saw UNCLE last night with 5 friends and we all enjoyed it. It was a lot funnier than I anticipated - I knew there would be humour but there was more than I was expecting, which was nice. The movie wasn't without its issues - the main thing for me was that the last act was a bit all over the place. But it still was fun and enjoyable for all of us - two girls, three guys.
Reviews have been mixed so it's understandable our views here will be mixed, but I completely disagree with some of Slumcat's points so am going to give my spin on a few things he said. And for the record, while I am a Cavill fan I am more than capable of criticising him when I think he's poor in a role or inconsistent! (eg. Immortals!)
I think this movie is wildly miscast. From the trailers Cavill looked good but in the movie he seems rather ill-suited for the role. Hammer was also cast against type but made it work. But Cavill, I think the accent was a huge challenge as he said in his interviews. He seemed very uncomfortable talking in an American accent.
I thought they were both well cast. I really liked Hammer, which I wasn't expecting. But we all agreed Cavill gave the stronger performance. He didn't seem uncomfortable at all with his accent, and that was one of the things my friends commented on after - how good it was and also how well it lended itself to his lines and character and made his quips funnier. But we are Brits, so perhaps we wouldn't pick up on subtle errors as well as an American, but if we're talking about him seeming
uncomfortable, well I didn't see that at all.
This role is not going to do any favors to Cavill. I think the reason he might have less dialog or less of fast dialog in MOS is his American accent. I think Snyder might be purposefully be using him that way.
Couldn't disagree more here! However well this movie does, it's going to do Cavill some favors. For people who have only seen him as Supes, it will show he can absolutely play someone totally different. He had great comedic timing IMO (some of his expressions were just hilarious too) and showing he can do humour and more light-hearted roles can only be a good thing. (Also, his accent in MoS was totally different to this and he nailed that IMO so...)
And the film is kinda strangely scripted so that no one character emerges as a lead though I got the feeling that with a big star in the role, Solo might have been the lead. Cavill is actually billed second in the opening titles, so it's not just BvS where he's being demoted.
There are two leads. Hammer was billed first in opening credits, Cavill was billed first in closing credits. Cavill was billed first in all the ads/TV spots so if anyone is being demoted, its not him.
The best performances are undoubtedly by the women. Their utter confidence and panache specially shines through when you see the men struggling though Hammer is decent. I don't see a sequel happening at all. The movie's kinda a misfire I would say.
Disagree here too - because surprisingly, I wasn't overly impressed with Alicia Vikander. I love her on the whole and think she's an excellent actress, but she was a little flat here in my opinion. She had some great moments, but from my POV no way did she outshine the male leads. Maybe it was just a character thing but I felt she didn't add much to the movie on the whole apart from in terms of the plot and her relationship with Ilya. Elizabeth Debicki I thought was fantastic, so I agree with you there!
This is the thing - all of this just comes down to personal opinion so there's no right or wrong. I've read reviews saying Hammer and Cavill's chemistry is the best thing about the movie; I've read others saying they have absolutely none whatsoever. I've read reviews saying Alicia Vikander is the best thing about the movie; I completely disagreed. Some reviewers totally 'got' Cavill's accent and thought it was great; others thought weird or misplaced or whatever. Critics aren't necessarily right or wrong - it's just THEIR opinion.