Axl Van Sixx
Comrade
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2005
- Messages
- 2,218
- Reaction score
- 511
- Points
- 73
Even as a BvS defender, I have to say I was somewhat disappointed by the portrayal of Superman in this movie. As was the case in MoS, there are a lot of nice little moments, and Cavill does his best with them. But the problem is that he is never given enough to work with. It's been said before that Snyder is more interested in Superman as a symbol than he is as a character. In BvS that becomes a real problem, because a significant character death means much less to the audience when we've never gotten a chance to truly know that character.
Maybe Snyder prefers his Superman as the strong, silent type. But I'm not sure why we've had a trend for three movies now where the actor playing Superman - be it Brandon Routh or Henry Cavill - is given minimal dialogue. More often than not, they have to act physically, largely through their facial expressions. What gives?
My own theory is that the sheer iconic status of Superman is intimidating to these screenwriters. More than any other superhero, people have a very specific idea of how Superman should act and behave. Instead of taking on that challenge and making the character their own, it seems screenwriters prefer to duck the challenge by barely giving the character any dialogue or personality at all. And that's a shame not only for the audience, but for the actors.
Cavill is a good actor and you can see in interviews that he has plenty of charisma. Within the DCEU, however, he's just not allowed to use it. When I saw clips from Senator Finch's hearing in the trailers, I got really excited thinking Superman would give a great Mr. Smith Goes To Washington-style speech defending himself, his actions, and his ideals of truth and justice. Then I saw how it turned out in the movie. I should have known. What a missed opportunity.
Maybe Snyder prefers his Superman as the strong, silent type. But I'm not sure why we've had a trend for three movies now where the actor playing Superman - be it Brandon Routh or Henry Cavill - is given minimal dialogue. More often than not, they have to act physically, largely through their facial expressions. What gives?
My own theory is that the sheer iconic status of Superman is intimidating to these screenwriters. More than any other superhero, people have a very specific idea of how Superman should act and behave. Instead of taking on that challenge and making the character their own, it seems screenwriters prefer to duck the challenge by barely giving the character any dialogue or personality at all. And that's a shame not only for the audience, but for the actors.
Cavill is a good actor and you can see in interviews that he has plenty of charisma. Within the DCEU, however, he's just not allowed to use it. When I saw clips from Senator Finch's hearing in the trailers, I got really excited thinking Superman would give a great Mr. Smith Goes To Washington-style speech defending himself, his actions, and his ideals of truth and justice. Then I saw how it turned out in the movie. I should have known. What a missed opportunity.