I watched the scene again. It is not clear that Bjorn kept the coin or not.
Anyway I don't think the point was to show that it worths a fortune because that has no significance to the story, it is not important.
The point was to show that either Ragnar or his son payed the law giver to spare Rollo. I think the former did it.
Small role and I think he is a fictional character.
Guys....guys....let's be civil now. No need for violence....
Here's a question I have.... I remember a bit of the history for Rollo, but does anyone think he's going to stay loyal?
Also, I like the role of the English priest. I was sad to see it diminished in this episode. tbh....though I love they gave me closure, I felt like this episode should have been with season one.
Indeed, Xavier and I are merely jesting.
I also forgot the exact reasoning behind Rollo and Ragnar being at each other, so I put it down to Rollo being a snake and a jerk face.

I actually think she is playing the long game. Her former husband was replaced and she's now a servant in what used to be her household. I think she sees a man who could be Jarl and if anyone was going to replace Ragnar it would be Rollo. So she's backed the dark horse...I'm pretty curious why the former Jarl's wife is still trying to get in good with Rollo. He's lost any semblance of power or potential power he once had, what does she get out of it now? Perhaps it's a way to stay close to Ragnar and the benefits of being close to a powerful family...beyond that, I don't see her game plan.
