TheCorpulent1
SHAZAM!
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2001
- Messages
- 154,474
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
I guess because the drawbacks to super-speed are more obvious than those of super-strength. If you punch someone, your strength level is so minuscule that you'd certainly not produce any major opposing force that would affect the environment. But if you drive a car with the windows down or ride a motorcycle on the highway, you can easily feel the force of wind resistance against you at just 60 or 80 mph. Magnify those experiences to super-strength and you'd probably overlook the opposing force factor, but with super-speed, you're left scratching your head as to why the Flash's face doesn't tear off or little particles don't drill through him as he zooms by at near-light speed. The downside of super-speed is more intuitive than that of super-strength, so the Speed Force was created to explain it.
Also, speed is more directly related to kinetic energy than strength, so it's easier to envision a whole energy field that supplies that particular energy than it is to envision a field of muscle density and potential energy and all the stuff that goes into lifting something really heavy or hitting something really hard. Energy is easy to conceive as manipulable as well. Strength, not so much. That's why there's also tachyon particles to control time and the Green to control plant life--time and the growth of plants are also easy to conceive as manipulable quantities. Strength isn't.
It should be noted as well that, eventually, Superman did get something to explain problems inherent in super-strength, like why gigantic things don't fall apart on him when he lifts them since he's a tiny mass exerting boatloads of force on a tiny point on their surfaces. He's got a subconscious tactile telekinetic field that keeps those objects intact, which was expanded on with his clone, Kon-El. So technically there have been some attempts to explain even the super-strength problems.
Ultimately, some writers just like to explain things. If the stories are good--which most of the stories spinning out of the Speed Force's invention are--more power to 'em, I say.
Also, speed is more directly related to kinetic energy than strength, so it's easier to envision a whole energy field that supplies that particular energy than it is to envision a field of muscle density and potential energy and all the stuff that goes into lifting something really heavy or hitting something really hard. Energy is easy to conceive as manipulable as well. Strength, not so much. That's why there's also tachyon particles to control time and the Green to control plant life--time and the growth of plants are also easy to conceive as manipulable quantities. Strength isn't.
It should be noted as well that, eventually, Superman did get something to explain problems inherent in super-strength, like why gigantic things don't fall apart on him when he lifts them since he's a tiny mass exerting boatloads of force on a tiny point on their surfaces. He's got a subconscious tactile telekinetic field that keeps those objects intact, which was expanded on with his clone, Kon-El. So technically there have been some attempts to explain even the super-strength problems.
Ultimately, some writers just like to explain things. If the stories are good--which most of the stories spinning out of the Speed Force's invention are--more power to 'em, I say.