"I am Doom...What Gods Dare Stand Against Me"---The official Dr. Doom Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
:dry:

Hey man Im just trying to spin things.

If it's just that he has a site named Latveria then they can go f*** themselves

I don't want it either. I'd rather have your suggestion. I'd love if it was a plot twist where he was the ruler of Latveria but they already did that with the last movies.
 
I don't want it either. I'd rather have your suggestion. I'd love if it was a plot twist where he was the ruler of Latveria but they already did that with the last movies.

:huh:
I havent seen them in a while but I dont remember that? I remember he was being shipped to Latveria but that's it
 
Well for sure he wont be a sorcerer at the levels of doctor strange either, hell maybe he isn't even a doctor in any science. At this point i dont even expect a costume, maybe a horrible rip off iron man with some luck.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=My7YVK8bx8s

i wish someday we see something like this
 
Well, he still wears his creepy costume. Maybe the bridge of events that leads to that is cool?
 
doom-meme-112119.jpg

And in real life, they just call me "loser". :o
 
:huh:
I havent seen them in a while but I dont remember that? I remember he was being shipped to Latveria but that's it

They never did anything with it but he had a castle in the second one and I think the mask was a gift from Latveria.
 
They never did anything with it but he had a castle in the second one and I think the mask was a gift from Latveria.

This time his mask will be something he won on eBay.

Unless in this movie, there's a new bidding site named Latveria.
 
Maybe Latveria is like that "Second Life" virtual world, where "Doom" is ruler there. He sets his "Doom bots" onto other users to sabotage their efforts to become monarch there. That's the only way that Latveria could actually tie in with his origin now and he could still be ruler there.
 
I don't know guys. FF is already a lost cause but now I'm actually starting to get worried about Star Wars.
 
Josh Trank seems to be a very competent film maker (Chronicle is a great movie) so this movie will more than likely be a competent film. He was also able to make Chronicle with only $12 million, so he'll probably be able to make this one with less than 70 million. It'll end up making 250-300 mil world wide and Fox will see it as a success which is very disappointing to me.
 
I don't know guys. FF is already a lost cause but now I'm actually starting to get worried about Star Wars.

Rebels is really good so far, i think Kinberg gets Star Wars and Xmen, but this is bull****, i have no idea whats he doing. Maybe he wants the movie to burn in purpose, cause this choices defy logic.

Now that i think of, Josh Trank will do a star wars movie mmm which is owned by Disney, which that owns Marvel as well. I starting to think this is an inside job from the mouse
 
Josh Trank seems to be a very competent film maker (Chronicle is a great movie) so this movie will more than likely be a competent film. He was also able to make Chronicle with only $12 million, so he'll probably be able to make this one with less than 70 million. It'll end up making 250-300 mil world wide and Fox will see it as a success which is very disappointing to me.


Chronicle was also cheap because the powers were pretty easy to do compared to say, fireballs, a rock man, etc.

Id be surprised if FF is under the standard reported 150 mill.

Remember when there was a rumor that ASM only had a 80 mill budget
 
Wouldn't/shouldn't there be some kind of clause in the Fox/Marvel contract that would state that Fox has to at least call the characters by their real names? Doesn't it rather defeat the purpose of popularizing their characters to the movie-going masses if they are being misrepresented on film?
 
But otoh, I almost feel like he's trolling us... successfully....
 
And here we thought they couldn't give us something worse than Galactus the Cosmic Fart.
 
Wouldn't/shouldn't there be some kind of clause in the Fox/Marvel contract that would state that Fox has to at least call the characters by their real names? Doesn't it rather defeat the purpose of popularizing their characters to the movie-going masses if they are being misrepresented on film?

I would suspect that when the contracts were written, Marvel and their lawyers might have never anticipated Fox could be this dumb.

For example, you wouldn't prohibit making a variation that is a musical with all the characters riding donkeys . . . because who in their right mind would conceive of such a thing?
 
But otoh, I almost feel like he's trolling us... successfully....

I would like to believe that Kebbel is just making this up and having a big laugh, but unfortunately it fits right with everything else we've heard.
 
Now that i think of, Josh Trank will do a star wars movie mmm which is owned by Disney, which that owns Marvel as well. I starting to think this is an inside job from the mouse

Trank has said more publicly about that gig than he ever has about the Fantastic Four. He's clearly excited about the chance to do a Star Wars film. This thing... is looking more and more like a paycheck.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,266
Messages
22,074,891
Members
45,875
Latest member
kedenlewis
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"