WarriorDreamer
Sidekick
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2011
- Messages
- 1,719
- Reaction score
- 11
- Points
- 58
Yeah I want the classic symbol to be on his chest too. But seeing as it's a reboot they might go for something a bit different.
Yeah I want the classic symbol on his chest too. Although seeing as it's a reboot they might go for something a bit different.
Maybe not symbol at all
![]()
I prefer the look without the symbol. Having the symbiote put a logo on itself seems silly.
I stand by my statement that the symbiote shouldn't put logos on itself.
Lenses can be dismissed as simple eye coverings. A creature will naturally protect it's eyes, it's pretty rare that a creature brands itself.
I'm not expert on symbiote reasoning. I can only assume it's because black is darker than white, if the coverings needed to be seen through, it stands to reason they'd be lighter in color.
Perhaps that shape best suits the host? As far as symbiote Spider-man having a symbol, I don't see why it's necessary. Do you think is someone were web-slinging around New York in a black suit sans logo that people would assume it's not Spider-man?
Who swings around on webs.Symbiote Spider-Man without a symbol just looks like some dude in a generic skin-tight black suit.
Who is huge and swings around on tendrils and is sometimes murderous.Venom without the symbol just looks like a generic monster.
Who swings around on webs.
Who is huge and swings around on tendrils and is sometimes murderous.
I don't see the issue. I personally feel that a creature wouldn't put a logo on itself. Not really a far-off concept. It's a matter of personal opinion.
Why on earth would we be discussing symbiotes out of the context of Spider-man? That doesn't make sense.
Who cares what they would look like outside this particular context? They're fictional.
Wouldn't concept art still lie within the realm of Spider-man related media?
I don't understand the last part of that statement.