I'm Reading Your Stuff: General News and Discussion Thread

You'd think that a co-CEO wanting scripts to be good is some bad, holier-than-thou mindset after reading some of these threads lol

Gotta strong feeling nothing about Part II will look like Gunn came in and stepped on anything. Same goes for something with major talent in the DCU like Lanterns.
 
Gunn has enough on his plate and he obviously trusts Reeves enough that he never pressured him about the script.

@BatLobster I think anything DC related will be DC Studios at this point. Otherwise the setup doesn't work and I doubt Gunn and Saffran take the job.
 
He's bashed both the Burton and Nolan films in the past, and then called The Flash one of the best superhero films of all time. That's a big oof in my book! I kind of wish I didn't know that the guy running DC for the foreseeable future holds those kinds of opinions.
I think he was just being ultra diplomatic, especially because The Flash needed all the help it could possibly get given the BTS drama and there not being much public enthusiasm despite Keaton returning. Same reason why Tom Cruise was singing its praises for a bit there.
 
This may be a controversial take, but I want to see Riddler dressed like Luigi here for one of his alternate outfits at some point.View attachment 142331
I'd much rather see him in a turtleneck or long sleeved shirt with the symbol scrawled onto it as a nod to his original '66 outfit. 50/50 on whether the cold weather mask stays but I wouldn't hate if it did.

MV5BMWRiM2EwZWYtOGNjOC00ZDU5LTg2MmUtMjBlYzE0YzUxMjhlXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMTAwNDM3OA@@._V1_SY1000_CR...jpg
 
Last edited:
I'd much rather see him in a turtleneck or long sleeved shirt with the symbol scrawled onto it as a nod to his original '66 outfit. 50/50 on whether the cold weather mask stays but I wouldn't hate if it did.

View attachment 142353

For Riddler’s main outfit, I think Matt is definitely putting him in either a suit or a fitted trench coat with question marks painted all over. Riddler is done with his mask. He passed that entire look onto his followers. Though I could also see him in a turtleneck as well for his casual style.

Much like how Penguin had different outfits until, finally, his main outfit.
IMG_7487.jpeg

Again how many sweaters does his attorney own?
Probably has a sweater warehouse. That would be impressive.
 
For Riddler’s main outfit, I think Matt is definitely putting him in either a suit or a fitted trench coat with question marks painted all over. Riddler is done with his mask. He passed that entire look onto his followers. Though I could also see him in a turtleneck as well for his casual style.

Much like how Penguin had different outfits until, finally, his main outfit.
View attachment 142369


Probably has a sweater warehouse. That would be impressive.
See, I don't know about that. On one hand, the mask was his attempt at emulating Batman and since his idol basically told him to **** off, you could make a case for him shedding it. By that same token though, like you said, it is indeed now the face of The Riddler, for all intents and purposes and sets him apart from previous versions in a very big way. So when you spin it like that, I can see it staying.

I also feel like Penguin's a different case. He lives a lavish lifestyle and has his eye on the mayor's spot, yet has a skewed reference point of the kinds of circles such people could afford to run in, hence his childhood love for Fred Astaire and dressing in a tuxedo to "play the part" of a member of high society.

Nashton doesn't really have that. He's a downtrodden member of the lower-class who became a murderous terrorist after witnessing Batman in action and dressed accordingly, in his own way. The only way you could really rationalize him wearing the classic outfit is The Joker influencing him, either intentionally or subconsciously. There's a level of rationalization beyond just "They look like that in the comics" (not implicating that you're one of those people btw, just a minor vent generally-speaking).
 
See, I don't know about that. On one hand, the mask was his attempt at emulating Batman and since his idol basically told him to **** off, you could make a case for him shedding it. By that same token though, like you said, it is indeed now the face of The Riddler, for all intents and purposes and sets him apart from previous versions in a very big way. So when you spin it like that, I can see it staying.

I also feel like Penguin's a different case. He lives a lavish lifestyle and has his eye on the mayor's spot, yet has a skewed reference point of the kinds of circles such people could afford to run in, hence his childhood love for Fred Astaire and dressing in a tuxedo to "play the part" of a member of high society.

Nashton doesn't really have that. He's a downtrodden member of the lower-class who became a murderous terrorist after witnessing Batman in action and dressed accordingly, in his own way. The only way you could really rationalize him wearing the classic outfit is The Joker influencing him, either intentionally or subconsciously. There's a level of rationalization beyond just "They look like that in the comics" (not implicating that you're one of those people btw, just a minor vent generally-speaking).

Don’t get me wrong, if Riddler dawns the mask again, I wouldn’t be all that upset about it. Though, what makes me think he’s done with it is in his speech to his followers.

“Now, when the time arrives, I will already be unmasked. The pigs will have me in their custody, but that's okay. Because then it will be your turn.”

This to me sounds like he’s parting with it and passing the torch. It’s a really genius way of giving his henchman a distinct look.

Also, when Riddler talks to Batman, he speaks about the mask in past tense. “Your mask is amazing. I wish you could have seen me in mine…My mask allowed me to be myself completely. No shame. No limits.”

Matt could still roll with the army surplus theme for Riddler, which is why a green military trench coat painted with question marks would make sense in his evolution for his main attire. Seeing himself as a sort of mad genius General of his army.
 
The Batman Part 1 takes place on Halloween and Part II looks to cover Christmas and New Years, so what holiday would you set Part III around?

Do something Valentines Day with Joker? April Fools At Arkham? Set it a few months later with a heatwave on July 4th?
April Fool's Day isn't a super huge holiday so I think I'd go with July 4th then, although Valentine's Day could be interesting too. It would be very funny and bold if all these movies just took place over the course of a few months.
 
The reality is this, the brave and the bold script needs to be a home run for it to exist. Which is no easy task when Batman has had multiple film iterations. How do you deliver something fresh and new while simultaneously having Reeves concurrent Batman film series. Which, is a year 2 batman and now has probably one of the most successful spin-offs for a comic book movie ever in terms of critical acclaim.
 
"He's not in the DCU right now"

If Gunn wants to stop the talk, he's gotta be a bit more careful with his choice of words... lol.

It does make it more fun, though...
 
Well there is a multiverse so he cant say never. But Pattinson is not going to be the DCU Batman.
 
Idk why he would wanna "stop the talk" anyway. People constantly talking about DC in a way that isn't deeply negative is good lol

But none of this is gonna happen any time soon. Part II and another Crime Saga spin-off might drop before DCU Batman makes an appearance tbh lol
 
Idk why he would wanna "stop the talk" anyway. People constantly talking about DC in a way that isn't deeply negative is good lol

But none of this is gonna happen any time soon. Part II and another Crime Saga spin-off might drop before DCU Batman makes an appearance tbh lol

That's a lot of years without Batman in the DCU. I don't know if they wait that long lol, but who knows.
 
Seriously after watching Superman, how can you tell me Battinson can work in that universe? :funny:
 
Seriously after watching Superman, how can you tell me Battinson can work in that universe? :funny:

Because it's the most punk rock thing James Gunn can do.

Grunge meets Punk...

Idk either fr though lol!
 
Seriously after watching Superman, how can you tell me Battinson can work in that universe? :funny:

Gunn keeps saying each film have its own unique tone & style, so maybe The Batman is happening in Jersey while Superman is taking down kaijus in Delaware. Why not?

Or better yet, set The Batman epic crime saga 10 years ago in the DCU so you don’t even need to address the Superman question. Now, Reeves can use metahumans in his sequels (should he even want to exercise that option). And given the way Gunn describes metahumans in DCU, even though they’ve been around for 300 years:

“If you saw a shark-man walking down the street, you’d probably vomit and s— yourself to death. If they [the average citizen of the DCU] saw one, it would be more like if you saw Paul McCartney on the sidewalk in New York.”

Maybe we just haven’t seen one yet. There were those Clayface rumors. Who knows what’s in the Gotham’s sewers…

killer-croc-batman.jpg
 
There's no real reason to believe Gunn has now forced Reeves to bring their worlds together so I'm not really tripping off this? Reeves also gave an up in the air answer early this year but I still don't think he wants it, and as far as we know Gunn is cool w that. Gunn also seems to want his own iteration anyway.

The focus seems to be to shoot Part II ASAP and get a DCU Batman draft by the end of this year maybe.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,370
Messages
22,093,080
Members
45,888
Latest member
amyfan32
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"