Project862006
Avenger
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2008
- Messages
- 21,197
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 31
might have to wait for a god of war movie then guys lol
might have to wait for a god of war movie then guys lol
True, these movies already have some pretty expensive stuff going on. At the same time if they made made Theseus a full on demigod I dont see how that would be looked at as being impossible, I saw the change as the writers just taking the easy way out and simplifying the story. I think Theseus was just ultra powerfull and could lift boulders and such. I saw crazier things in the movie. They could have given him Ultra Strength.
With Clash of the Titans we had a giant fricken Kraken while our hero rides a Pegasus. If they can afford that they can afford a bit of cash to make the son of a God a little more powerful.
I'm not disagreeing with you, but in the movie, he wasn't the son of a god. They make a point to say that he was the offspring of his mothers rape.
its funny cuz i just mentioned this the other day in the Skyrim thread, but i hate it when they use North American accents in movies like this. totally takes me right out
Ok I saw this today. Way better than Clash, that movie was awful, but not as good as 300 imo. The dialogue is wretched. The music is bleh. The story is pretty bland.
Cons:
The above mentioned
There were only like 5 gods...I think 1 or 2 were just short cameos
Poseidon looked younger than his son (I think that was his son)
The gods really had no motivation or story, they were underdeveloped
Mickey Rourke is just awful. Yes he was sadistic but as an actor, just as bland as a vanilla milkshake. I really don't know why he gets these big jobs.
Pros:
Gorgeous movie
Henry Cavill is awesome
The battles were amazing...the final battle was just kick ass
The set design and the costume design was amazing...the gods looked great
Overall it was alright. Def. not as bad as the critics made it out to be. Def. way better than Clash but imo not as good as 300...but it's close. They are good in sort of their on way. I would say 6/10.
The gods really had no motivation or story, they were underdeveloped
Mickey Rourke is just awful. Yes he was sadistic but as an actor, just as bland as a vanilla milkshake. I really don't know why he gets these big jobs.
Well that's good to know. However it paints an even blacker circle over the concept of why he and real demi gods are more or less indistinguishable.
How do you mean? He isnt treated like a demigod in the film, nor are there any to compare him to in the story to get confused by. Not every hero of Greek myth is a demigod (they usually get the constellation consolation prize if they arent, though). Hes a guy who was taught fighting, honor, and wisdom from a young age, but he doesnt have any super powers that are prevalent in demigods.
He DOES become one at the end though; when he dies from his wounds, the gods beam him up to Mt. Olympus.

I think there was an element of arrogance, complete lack of emotional connection and an almost 'yea whatever' attitude to how Rourke played the character.
Like in that first scene in the temple when he's telling the priest about his family being killed - he has one initial action of anger when he spits into the holy water, but then seems to gather himself, and instead of saying it with bitterness or hatred, he tells the story like he's pretending he no longer cares in some macho way, while he carelessly douses the guy in oil.
I have no idea if that was intentional, or if that's just because Rourke was being himself, but it worked for Hyperion IMO![]()
I liked that he didn't give a **** about pretty much anything, and that he came across as the most arrogant villain I have ever seen.
It seems like most of the roles Rourke has have him either play someone who is arrogant, or don't give a damn about anything, or both.
