No. I would have been extremely disappointed.I still wish Batman would have died with the bomb. Would have been more fitting and fulfilling of an ending...
What a joke statement.PTA also made Magnolia, the greatest student film of all time. So he's not the be all authority on movies for me.
I mean you no disrespect, but is there any chance your friend is full of it?He said the score was incredible, the set design was fantastic, and the effects were fantastic. He said like DiCaprio in Inception, he feels MM does a fantastic job, but it isn't the kind of performance that will get serious Oscar push. He also said he'd rank it fifth so far of the films he's seen this year. (Inherent Vice, Birdman, Foxcatcher and Boyhood being his top four). I didn't ask about anything plot related because I'm avoiding spoilers. The only negative he said was 'shot selection choices were sort of boring', which sounds like it's typical Nolan in that category. So nothing worries me by that comment.
t:Exactly. Frankly I hate it when you spend such a long time with a character only to get a downer ending. Its why I dont understand why people want either Luke, Han or Leia to get offed early in Ep7. Why go through a characters entire journey just for them to get killed.
Same reason I hope the crew in Interstellar get a somewhat decent ending but I dont think Nolan has done a bad ending yet.
I mean you no disrespect, but is there any chance your friend is full of it?t:
Can we get a direct comparison between Interstellar and The Dark Knight in overall quality?
For the most part, he's good at endings. For how mediocre I think TDK is, I always liked the ending...until TDKR came out, and now that I know what really happened in the story, I think the ending in TDK is pretty bad. And I also think the ending for TDKR is a relentless amount of dumb twists after twists, and it just ends up being ridiculous.
But aside from his last two Batman movies, I think he does a good job at his endings.

If you are talking to me, I'm pretty sure he would take TDK over it as he sees TDK as Nolan's ultimate achievement.
He said the score was incredible, the set design was fantastic, and the effects were fantastic. He said like DiCaprio in Inception, he feels MM does a fantastic job, but it isn't the kind of performance that will get serious Oscar push. He also said he'd rank it fifth so far of the films he's seen this year. (Inherent Vice, Birdman, Foxcatcher and Boyhood being his top four). I didn't ask about anything plot related because I'm avoiding spoilers. The only negative he said was 'shot selection choices were sort of boring', which sounds like it's typical Nolan in that category. So nothing worries me by that comment.

Ah another one of those my friend type thing on this forum. We never get that type of stuff before
Sounds Great.He said the score was incredible, the set design was fantastic, and the effects were fantastic. He said like DiCaprio in Inception, he feels MM does a fantastic job, but it isn't the kind of performance that will get serious Oscar push. He also said he'd rank it fifth so far of the films he's seen this year. (Inherent Vice, Birdman, Foxcatcher and Boyhood being his top four). I didn't ask about anything plot related because I'm avoiding spoilers. The only negative he said was 'shot selection choices were sort of boring', which sounds like it's typical Nolan in that category. So nothing worries me by that comment.
If the IMAX trailer is anything to go by shot selections doesnt look like a worry for me.
I don't quite understand people wanting Batman to have died. The way it ended made a lot more sense, and stayed true to how Batman isn't always necessarily Bruce Wayne in the source material. The symbol is the whole point.
Nolan ended it in a way that kept the symbol alive, and gave Bruce respite.
I still remember the collective sound of shock from the audience I was with when I saw Inception. I've never been in an audience where an ending produced that type of reaction before, just the massive chorus of 'What?' and 'No!' lol.
Because the film tries to have its cake and eat it too. Story-telling wise it gains nothing from Bruce living. They symbol thing works even better if he had, as Batman lives on even as Bruce Wayne dies.
t:But Bruce dying contradicts everything we had seen before , in the previous movie. Him dying would be his choice , don't forget it.
If he died like in a crash of the Tumbler , that would be slightly different and have a whole new meaningt:

Eh, Batman giving up for the better part of a decade already did that.
"We will chase him, because he can take it."
...until he decides to just call it quits.![]()
t:I was just thinking about this. For all the flak Nolan gets for being a "cold" director, the guy is a sucker for happy endings so the ending of TDKR wasn't really much of a surprise. I have issues with TDKR but I was happy that Bruce lived.