The Overlord
Superhero
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2002
- Messages
- 8,945
- Reaction score
- 241
- Points
- 73
Imagine the following:
Marvel are wanting to hire Robert Downey Jr for Iron Man back in 2008. But he says:
I don't want to do anything physical. This character makes me cringe. I want to play him as I want to, not how the character is. I don't want to wear any armour or shoot any energy blasts. Also, flying is so passe. I also don't like the idea of him being an inventor or a billionaire playboy. Make him a used car salesman instead.
Oh, and also I don't want to go by the name Iron Man. That sounds so corny.
But Marvel decide, despite all this, they want to hire him anyway, even with all the radical changes.
And then, just to show how silly the idea of Iron Man is, he throws us a bone with this brief nod to the armour by putting this thing on:
![]()
And he says "You look like a damn fool!".
And everyone agrees that Iron Man in armour would've look to silly to work on the big screen.
Anything could look silly if you choose the worst possible representation of it and make it look ridiculous.
I agree that Mike Colter was probably not the right person if he wanted so much changed. Why did they have to cast him at all costs?
Even Iron Fist's costume could look silly if they executed it in a poor way. But someone with imagination could probably come up with a badass but faithful representation of the classic look.
But here is the problem people on this thread keep ignoring, Iron Man was not a character linked to a fad like Cage and Iron Fist were.
Really I think Colter is playing the modern version of the character rather then the one from the 70s, Luke Cage has not worn his 70s era costume since the early 90s.
The whole "keep true to the source material" argument doesn't work, if the writers have changed the character over time. Cage got at least two different revamps one from the early 1990s and one from the early 2000s, so even in the comics the character is different then he was in the 70s. Adherence to source material should not mean trying to outdated concepts relevant past their prime.
This like saying in movie, Dazzler would still be obsessed with Disco in 2017, unless she is comic relief or a time traveler, that would not work, Disco has been dead for 40 years.
Again I think Luke was fine in his show, I think the problems with that show were down to pacing and Diamondback being a cartoon villain.
But I still think despite its flaws, Luke Cage would have been easier to adapt to the Netflix model then Iron Fist is.
Despite some fans complaints, Luke Cage was well reviewed, Iron Fist was poorly reviewed because its concept did not fit with Netflix's model.
Last edited:

