I can understand the idea if the filmmakers don't want to remind the audience of J.K. Simmons' excellent portrayal so soon and want to have a slow development for the reboot films, but at the same time it just doesn't feel like Spider-Man without Jameson. I guess by having Captain Stacy be so prominent, the film is going for something along the lines of Batman and Gordon with Spidey and Stacy, maybe capitalizing on Christopher Nolan's Batman films. Not to mention, the lack of Jonah appears to conform to a supposedly leaked synopsis of the film someone had put online several weeks ago.
^this.
to me, JJJ is such an integral part of Spidey's supporting cast, that it would be like a Superman movie without Perry White or Lois Lane, or a Batman movie without Alfred.
J.K. Simmons was the perfect JJJ. no one can ever replace him
The said has been said with Joker, Bond, Superman, Batman, among others....
Any actor can come in and do it just as good or better than their predecessor.
JJJ was the best part of SM3. Still, not having JJJ doesn't bother me too much. I want him there, but there are a lot of other things that are more important. They could just have peter make an income working for connors. Makes sense.
Batman still has Michael Keaton
Superman still has Christopher Reeves
Nicholson is rarely considered the best Joker
And as awesome as Craig is, he aint no Connery.
Batman still has Michael Keaton
Superman still has Christopher Reeves
Nicholson is rarely considered the best Joker
Thank God. Faithfulness, at last.