- Joined
- Aug 17, 2003
- Messages
- 67,045
- Reaction score
- 32,658
- Points
- 203
Wow a little dramatic aren't you? Slavery, facist state, 1984, selling your soul? Lol. This is how it's ever been.
If you go to a job interview you probably wear a suit because you want to portay an image that the company would like, you don't turn up as a total mess stinking of booze because you probably wont the job. That doesn't make your potential employer adolf hitler. They are just looking after the interests of their company which is there job.
There is a difference between what you do when you're on company time or property and what you do on your time. Yes, I don't come to a job interview dressed as a slob, but when I go home I can slob it up all I want. I have that freedom to do so. My employer has no right to tell me I cannot be a complete slob on my own property. The issue here is you think of their Twitter page as company property, and I don't think it does. Which brings me back to my point that actors, though employed by company X are not slaves to company X. Therefore, I can say and support whatever/whoever I want while not on company time.