The Iron Fist said:Who do you guys want to write the sequel?
Mr. Socko said:I don't care who's to blame. I just wanted a serquel and I doubt we're getting one. Why did Saw make more then the Punisher. Was it advertising? Marketing? WHAT!?!?!
All they got to do with the Punisher is the same thing they're doing with Saw.
But I say Marvel should regain the rights back anyway.
Mr. Socko said:Garth Ennis, if he could properly do a movie adaptation.
RedIsNotBlue said:I like how you completely ignore good points I bring up and just comment on the ones you can Vile. Die.
I don't care who's to blame. I just wanted a serquel and I doubt we're getting one. Why did Saw make more then the Punisher. Was it advertising? Marketing? WHAT!?!?!
TheVileOne said:Whatever like you never brush aside valid point. And I don't command you to die either. That's where you differ.
Beelze said:I could not get into Man On Fire that much. It had a lot going for it though. I liked the idea of the bodyguard and the girl establishing a bond of friendship, and have revenge not be based on someone killing a relative to the main character. But, like I said, couldn't get into it. I agree on the shakey camera work, and I guess I didn't like the introduction to the vengeance-taking. It was just "off" to me. Even the more brutal scenes didn't get to me too much. Hell, the "knife in the mouth" scene in The Punisher was cooler than most of the stuff in Man On Fire, even though it was so brief.
Kable24 said:Sounds like the ending of the Professional.