- Joined
- Aug 17, 2003
- Messages
- 72,302
- Reaction score
- 42,961
- Points
- 203
I think the title The Meg is worse than if they just called it Meg
If you have read the book series then you'd know how comical that sounds.If that was nemo he can just stay lost thank you very much!
I bet the next trailer has a shadowy government individual saying something like we have to capture it alive or something. Like theyre going to send a megaladon into North Korea or something
I dig how the last shot was basically that "leaked" teaser poster we saw before bit that had a bigger boat.
Also a second poster.
![]()
I dig how the last shot was basically that "leaked" teaser poster we saw before bit that had a bigger boat.
Also a second poster.
![]()
That trailer is absolutely ridiculous.
I kinda love it.
I dig how the last shot was basically that "leaked" teaser poster we saw before bit that had a bigger boat.
Also a second poster.
![]()
I did like the second trailer more but the first one was good too though it does make it somewhat harder to know what tone they intend to go with on this movie. Obviously it won't lean too hard on serious or camp.The international trailer has new footage and it's supposed to be less campy than the US one. Some folks are liking this one more.
I did like the second trailer more but the first one was good too though it does make it somewhat harder to know what tone they intend to go with on this movie. Obviously it won't lean too hard on serious or camp.
If Jaws is Jurassic Park of shark movies, Meg will be Jurassic World.
Bigger, louder and a lot dumber.
It's Jason Statham vs. a giant prehistoric shark. I'm fine with it being campy (for the record the comparisons to Piranha 3D aren't a bad thing for me as I actually enjoyed that film) and goofy as long as it's entertaining. The premise is inherently kind of ridiculous to begin with.
As an aside, I do have a question for those who've read the book. Is Li Bingbing's character meant to be Statham's love interest here? And is little girl his daughter to?
The original story and sequel were more serious and in fact the entire series keeps a serious (if at one point completely bonkers plot) tone. But the movie obviously is taking a different track than the books did.I didn't see the 2nd trailer myself but I'm guessing that the movie won't get into borderline camp territory. I haven't read the source material but I have read elsewhere that the first 2 books have a serious tone so I don't think the movie will have an extreme departure from that.
I think that the author of the book was consulted to some extent or he was kept in the loop by the studio on their plans with the movie adaptation (Steve Alten announced the poster/trailer release on twitter or instagram). So I do think the tonal shift in the US trailer has more to do with appealing to the lowest common denominator and it isn't entirely indicative of the tone in the movie. It'll have jokes sprinkled here and there but the threat is gonna be terrifying.
Now that is a awesome poster. That is the kind of horror related stuff I want to see when it comes to a movie like this. I also liked the international trailer more than the first one because of the more serious tone.
But you understand that this isnt meant to be straight up scary horror film nor a serious film. This is really not supposed to take itself all that seriously, its supoised to be mindless campy fun. A fun creature feature. Are some people not understanding this? Because if theyre expecting a serious tone overall and throughout theyre setting themselves up for disappointment.
Oh, this is what I am expecting. I actually felt the trailer was TOO straight, LOL. I felt the trailer could have been whackier and more zany.