I think the helmet is just a bit too big...that's it.
This is from Total Film magazine:
A new shot of Karl Urban as bad-ass law enforcer Judge Dredd has been revealed online.
The first image of Urban suited and booted appeared online last November, and this second image confirms the campy frills of Sly Stallones 1995 Dredd are well and truly dead.
Directed by Pete Travis and co-starring Olivia Thirlby and Lena Headey, this new adaptation of the comic has Dredd attempting to control the feral streets of Mega City One.
And Urban looks suitably sinister as the no-nonsense Street Judge, with his Dredd promising to be a darker, neo-noir vehicle that is truer to the original comic.
Sly's Dread was not campy, Batman & Robin was campy,
Sly's Dread was like Robocop but a human version.
like Robocop?. i don't see the same thing you do. Robocop was violent really violent. if anything the new Dredd will be in tone like Robocop.
Stallones Dredd was more like Batman Forever.
You know what, the more I look at Stallone's Judge Dredd, the less I really see a problem with it. Maybe it wasn't as blood-splatteringly violent as some fans think it should have been, be dammit if Dredd didn't kill a lot of people just in the first ten minutes!
And sure, this new film will honor all the Dredd-heads and keep his helmet on the whole movie, but looking at what little we've seen thus far, I'm honestly not THAT impressed. Urban's look as Dredd is honestly rather subdued. A lot of the visual flourishes from the comic costume appear to be severely downplayed. And physically, I don't get the impression of him towering over anyone, the way Stallone did, and with a costume closer to the comics than what Urban's sporting, in my opinion.
Yeah, you had Rob Schneider in a comic relief role, and Armand Assante DID chew a fair amount of scenery, but looking back on the film, it certainly wasn't campy, and I don't think it ever took the material lightly. Technically, I think a lot of elements of the film still hold up surprisingly well. The production design is astounding, the visual effects were serviceable by '95 standards, and Alan Silvestri laid down an amazing score for the film.
And sure, this new film will honor all the Dredd-heads and keep his helmet on the whole movie, but looking at what little we've seen thus far, I'm honestly not THAT impressed. Urban's look as Dredd is honestly rather subdued. A lot of the visual flourishes from the comic costume appear to be severely downplayed. And physically, I don't get the impression of him towering over anyone, the way Stallone did, and with a costume closer to the comics than what Urban's sporting, in my opinion.
Yeah, you had Rob Schneider in a comic relief role, and Armand Assante DID chew a fair amount of scenery, but looking back on the film, it certainly wasn't campy, and I don't think it ever took the material lightly. Technically, I think a lot of elements of the film still hold up surprisingly well. The production design is astounding, the visual effects were serviceable by '95 standards, and Alan Silvestri laid down an amazing score for the film.
like Robocop?. i don't see the same thing you do. Robocop was violent really violent. if anything the new Dredd will be in tone like Robocop.
Stallones Dredd was more like Batman Forever.
Robocop's writers admit they ripped off Dredd's satirical violent tone for that film, so much so when it came to doing Stallone's Dredd they felt they couldn't go with that as it would be compared to closely to Robocop.
The result was humor that was all cheese all no satire (Fergie, Dredd's lame one liners, etc).
Another thing is they tried to do too much in one story: They combined elements from several stories (The Cursed Earth, Mutie the Pig, The Judge Child and the Judge Cal saga's). Should have gone with just the one imo.
All that being said, the Hammerstein robot and Mean Angel prosthetics were was ###king perfect.
There was a lot to like in Stallone's Dredd, for me anyway. But, there was also a lot to dislike.
^^^ brian.. I assume Eben sou mention the twin brother sou suggest stallone played both roles which would have allowed for both his ego and the execs to be happy, without theneed for Dredd to remove his helmet?
I suppose, but clearly, the storyline of Dredd being accused of murder would suffer among general audiences when you figure it'd make no sense for Dredd to have his helmet on while incarcerated. Failing that, you'd have to be incredibly, and ultimately annoyingly blatant in obscuring Stallone's face if he did remove his helmet after being prosecuted.
Furthermore, Stallone playing Rico would mean playing the villain of the film. When was the last time you saw Stallone play a villain? (excluding the 3rd Spy Kids film, of course). Ego, especially around that time, would have definitely played a factor in making that an unlikely avenue.
Rico and Dread could of been paternal twins in addition they mentioned in the film that Dread got all the good genes. Seeing as though at that a movie called TWins was out with Arnold where twins had a similar situation where one was built to be an Adonis while the other was left with left overs. It was not that hard of a leap for me a guy who before that movie never heard of Judge Dread.
"Death Race 2000"(whose protagonist, Frankenstein, inspired the look of Judge Dredd). He played the villain very convincingly.