Les Miserables: Even the thread will make you cry - Part 2

Rate the movie

  • 10

  • 9

  • 8

  • 7

  • 6

  • 5

  • 4

  • 3

  • 2

  • 1

  • 10

  • 9

  • 8

  • 7

  • 6

  • 5

  • 4

  • 3

  • 2

  • 1


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
If I'm wrong whatever but I think that it will make over 100mil if it keeps the good buzz going.
 
Oscar Buzz will keep its momentum going at the box office, especially if it can pull out big wins.
 
It's practically a shoe-in to win a Golden Globe in its category, that will go a long way.
 
Awards season will be good to this films box office. No worries.
 
I think anything under $100 million would be considered a disappointment, with the talent, reputation and buzz involved. $85 million isn't even the break-even mark since the budget was $65 million plus publicity etc.
 
Box office... hopefully but musical films are a real challenge to actually make money off of. The cast may help though, personally think that will do it.

http://boxofficemojo.com/genres/chart/?id=musical.htm

Why doesn't that list include "The sound of music"? I've heard that if films are adjusted for inflation, Sound of Music is the fifth highest-grossing film of all time and of all genres.

I doubt Les Mis reaches that far, although it would certainly deserve it.
 
Why doesn't that list include "The sound of music"? I've heard that if films are adjusted for inflation, Sound of Music is the fifth highest-grossing film of all time and of all genres.
The list is only for films released from 1974-present. I can see Les Mis having the same success that Chicago had ten years ago.
 
The list is only for films released from 1974-present. I can see Les Mis having the same success that Chicago had ten years ago.

Anything less than Chicago would be a huge disappointment. Les Miserables is a far more renowned musical.
 
Rusell cant sing and anne plays to over the top dramatic.not subtle in anyway.
 
And we have a rave!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbi...een-performance-career.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

Verdict: Vive Les Miserables!
Rating: 5 Stars
Les Miserables is a five-star movie musical extravaganza that hums with the spirit of Victor Hugo's classic novel and the landmark stage show upon which it's based.


And another!

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/filmreviews/9727469/Les-Miserables-review.html

Les Misérables, review
Tom Hooper’s screen adaptation of Les Misérables is a heart-soaring, crowd-delighting hit-in-waiting, writes Robbie Collin.
5 Stars
 
Well, at least the negative reviewer is admitting that he does not like the musical either, instead of the last negative review I read that was proceeding under the assumption that this movie was an adaptation of Victor Hugo's book.

I agree that Tom Hooper's shot selection is the weakest part of his game as a director, which is why I feel the King's Speech was very flawed and not Best Picture material.

Still, even this negative review pretty much makes this the perfect movie for me: good enough to be the film adaptation of this musical I have always wanted, but flawed enough not to win the Oscar over Life of Pi. :up:
 
This is already better received than Nine, but if reviews continue in this vein, Hooper can kiss his Director nomination goodbye.

That said, this is the reception I expected. It's a musical, after all.
 
BroadwayWorld.com roundup of reviews so far:

Review Roundup (12/6): LES MISERABLES Movie

by Review Roundups

Christmas can't get here fast enough, because that's when LES MISERABLES hits the big screen. Les Misérables is the motion-picture adaptation of the beloved global stage sensation seen by more than 60 million people in 42 countries and in 21 languages around the globe and still breaking box-office records everywhere in its 27th year.

Helmed by The King’s Speech’s Academy Award-winning director, Tom Hooper, the Working Title/Cameron Mackintosh production stars Hugh Jackman, Oscar® winner Russell Crowe, Anne Hathaway, Amanda Seyfried, Eddie Redmayne, Aaron Tveit, Samantha Barks, with Helena Bonham Carter and Sacha Baron Cohen.

Official reviews of the movie are still embargoed, but full reviews are slowing started to be released. Check out what the critics are saying thus far below!

Baz Bamigboye, Daily Mail: I've seen the film three times and each time the film seemed to grow in stature. I go to bed with the songs from Les Miserables ringing in my ears. I think of One More Day, Red and Black, Do you Hear the People Sing, Bring Him Home and Little People (by the way Daniel Huttlestone's Gavroche is very striking).

Todd McCarthy, Hollywood Reporter: One of the chief interests of the film is discovering the singing abilities of the notable actors assembled here, other than Jackman, whose musical prowess is well known. Crowe, who early in his career starred in The Rocky Horror Show and other musicals onstage in Australia, has a fine, husky baritone, while Eddie Redmayne surprises with a singing voice of lovely clarity. Colm Wilkinson, the original Jean Valjean onstage in London and New York, turns up here as the benevolent Bishop of Digne.

Robbie Collin, Telegraph: Les Misérables is only Hooper’s fourth feature, and his directorial style is still bedding in: some big, comic-book camera angles feel a touch over-egged, as does the extraordinarily shallow focus he uses in close-up. But he marshals the spectacle so spectacularly that it hardly matters. Hooper’s screenwriter William Nicholson (Shadowlands) has judiciously tinkered with the song order, which makes Les Misérables feel not only definitive, but utterly cinematic. You leave with not one song in your heart, but ten.

Justin Chang, Variety: As a faithful rendering of a justly beloved musical, "Les Miserables" will more than satisfy the show's legions of fans. Even so, director Tom Hooper and the producers have taken a number of artistic liberties with this lavish bigscreen interpretation: The squalor and upheaval of early 19th-century France are conveyed with a vividness that would have made Victor Hugo proud, heightened by the raw, hungry intensity of the actors' live oncamera vocals. Yet for all its expected highs, the adaptation has been managed with more gusto than grace; at the end of the day, this impassioned epic too often topples beneath the weight of its own grandiosity.

Jon Weisman, Variety: Best picture nominee? Fer sure. Best picture winner? Not necessarily, because while it is a film that soars in many places and is rock solid in others, "Les Miserables" also displays enough bumps and bruises to hurt it (and director Tom Hooper) in a close race. Some of the flaws I identified come from comparing it to the musical that I've held near and dear to my heart ever since I saw it Thanksgiving week 1987 in London – no doubt, a huge swath of Academy members have their own personal relationship with the film, and I find it a little hard to believe that they won't nitpick it.

Marlow Stern, Daily Beast: Nearly every number in Hooper’s film is brilliantly performed, with other highlights including Jackman’s rendition of “What Have I Done” following his silver theft, the camera skying upward to reveal a beautiful “eye of God” shot (a nifty trick repeated to equally thrilling effect several times throughout the film); the quodlibet “One Day More,” with Hooper cutting to different members of the cast; and the heartbreaking ballad “On My Own,” magnificently sung by Barks (who played the role on the West End). And of course, the revolutionary anthem “Do You Hear the People Sing” soars to the heavens.

Oliver Littelton, Indie Wire: Standing ovations and tear-stained handkerchiefs greeted showings on both coasts, along with a general consensus that the film is a triumphant screen version of the stage musical hit destined to be a big Oscar player. And while we wouldn't want to jump in until reviews officially drop next month, it's certainly the biggest threat to "Lincoln" at present, and might well turn out to be the big dog of the season.

Scott Feinberg, Hollywood Reporter: Whether or not the use of actors' live on-set singing (as opposed to re-recording it in post-production) actually enhances the believability of a film more than it compromises the quality of the music, audiences seem to have been sold on the former, thanks in large part to Universal's recent featurette about the practice. Moreover, any "first" makes for a great talking-point on the awards season campaign trail. (Incidentally, all of the musical numbers were also shot in close-up and uninterrupted takes.)

Steve Zeitchik, LA Times: There will be plenty of review takes later, so suffice to say that in-between the movie offers some rousing emotion and vivid set pieces, uneven pacing and the sight of Russell Crowe singing. (He's fine as the law-enforcing Javert but, like Hugh Jackman’s Jean Valjean and the other males in the cast, pales next to the women, Amanda Seyfried’s Cosette and particularly Anne Hathaway’s Fantine, whose single-take, close-up "I Dreamed a Dream" is bound to bring down multiplexes and land her on Oscar ballots.) Other Kleenex-producing musical numbers include the large-scale “Do You Hear The People Sing?," offered in reprise later in the film. (Samantha Barks' "On My Own” did not have the same effect on this reporter; others may disagree.)

Mike Ryan, Huffington Post: I will say, as a complete novice to the world of Les Miz (I've decided to go with Les Miz, by the way), I thought the film was wonderful and found myself momentarily confused only a handful of times. (This is arguably my fault for being easily confusable.) My personal favorite movie this year is still Argo, but after seeing Les Miz, my gut is telling me that it will beat both Argo and Lincoln for Best Picture. And the talk you may or may not have heard about Anne Hathaway being a shoo-in for Best Supporting Actress as Fantine is true. (Though, again, not knowing anything about Les Miz, I was honestly shocked by how little she is in this movie.)

Tom O'Neil, Gold Derby: Reviews are embargoed until Dec. 11 so it's tricky to discuss the film, but here goes. The audience flipped for it. It's (nearly) everything that "Les Miz" nuts hoped for. Eddie Redmayne is the big surprise. His performance wows and, yikes, who knew he could sing like that? Sacha Baron Cohen and Helena Bonham Carter try to steal the film -- and the contents of every pocket in 19th-century Paris. But Carter can't win. Anne Hathaway has Best Supporting Actress in the bag and Hugh Jackman poses a serious threat to Daniel Day-Lewis' dominion over Best Actor.
http://broadwayworld.com/article/Review-Roundup-126-LES-MISERABLES-Movie-20121206
 
Ok, if you google it (choose the last 24 hours range), there are tons of more reviews. They are mostly positive, but all have something negative to say. Some seem to think that the first half of the movie is much better than the second.
 
So I'm debating on whether or not I want to wait until the movie to hear Suddenly.
 
http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2012/dec/06/les-miserables-review-first-look

This one seems really positive, but I'm not sure what they want to say in the end.

Oh, and this one:
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-e...ooper-and-starring-anne-hathaway-8390395.html

To say that Les Miserables is going to be a hit is putting it mildly. Unlike the opening night of Trevor Nunn’s Barbican production, which produced poor reviews but staggering box office, this new production – which gives the characters of Jean Valjean, Fantine, Cosette a forever life – is going to go down in history for the way it tells a musical tale on the big screen.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"