Superwoman Prime
Damaged Beyond Repair
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2005
- Messages
- 12,088
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 31
They don't, Parents-Gun-Bat is grasping at straws.
The truth is: Burton didn't really care about the source material, he tried to change everything to fit HIS vision.
For the record. Burton's Batman has nothing to do with Miller'S DKR Batman.
But Miller's Batman is 80s!
Yeah, like the Penguin and Catwoman, back then in the "Gothic Age of comics".
And now? And why not? Afterall he used DEEP quotes like "You have a kind of dark side, don't yaa, Selina?" WOW! Sounds absolutely not forced! Romancing the stones!
It was at least hinted that she became some supernatural girl. She started to jump around and do martial arts afterwards.
Every time I see Selina Kyle moving like a real cat I feel a little bit embarrassed.
Selina Kyle is supposed to be a human cat
They aren't too bright, i think that's a fact.
yeah, like Superman, Hawkman, Micky Mouse.
For that matter Schumacher, Nolan, Raimi, Donner, Lester are doing the same, changing things to fit their visions. It’s what artists do.
About the not caring for hte sourc material, you’re plain wrong. And offered no support for that random statement.
For the record: you’re wrong.
Burton himself claimed that he got influence from B:TDKR many times.
Burton’s Batman release date : 1989.
How is Burton taking the good elements from those characters being denied by some invented comic age name?
Logics is not making you any favour.
^^ Is this how a desperate guy sounds when he finds out he can’t poke any hole into a solid argument?
You said Batman had girlfriends in the original comcis. I said he had girfriends in the movie. You can’t deny that. You’d be doing a lot better by admitting your defeat than by quoting excellent lines from Burton’s movies as a way of blind bashing.
Once again, who’s to say she didn’t learn martial arts beforehand?
Are you telling me that Batman’s skills are super-powers?
A longer exposure to the opposite sex should fix that up.
^^ Oh yes. The bit where you totally contradict your own statement.
pssst, you forgot to make a point. Even a wrong one.
Most of them failed. In my eyes.
On a superficial level they cared for the source material, yes.
He can claim what he wants. Keaton's Batman is nothing like Miller's Rambo Batman who drives around in a BIG TANK!
WOW! I meant 80s in the way that his Batman is modelled after the typical 80s action movies: loud and intense. Burton's Batman is silent. He is hidden. Miller's Batman is in-your-face.
They have never been that way. Not even remotely.
It's easy to change characters to fit your "vision". You could take the Crazy Quilt and burton-ize him. It wouldn't be difficult. It's weak.
Weak like a Joker wearing make-up.
Yes, yes. Feel superior.
I don't know.
It's really stupid to discuss with somebody who is as self-righteous as you.
Everyone should see that Burton's Batman is a lot different than Miller's and even the Batman from the comics. When you fail to see that I cannot "poke any hole" into your arguments. That's the problem with discussions.
I try to be open-minded
you are just defending these points because you like the movie.
But stop being so undiscerning and not wanting to see that Burton basically developed his own characters who shares some similarities with the source (like the batears, you know. But then again there is a big rubber suit).
THe Batman movie romances are so forced.
Selina Kyle=secretary who SUDDENLY became a master martial artist
Bruce Wayne=guy who trained since he was a young boy
You didn't get it. I was trying to say that Catwoman is NOT supposed to be a human cat, she is a woman who puts on a catlike costume. Like Batman. And Batman is not a human bat. So why would she move like a cat and even lick herself?
This would only make sense if the "catlicks" really changed her. You know, like radioactive cats mutating her.
Discussing with you is pointless.
You think you are superior to other members here.
The point I was going to make: A lot of characters KILLED. Batman is not something special. Should Micky Mouse kill again?
Parents-Gun-Bat give it a rest you'll never beat a vet like El Payaso
^ Dude go pick up some early 90's Catwoman comics and you'll prove yourself wrong, the way she moves, her personality is so much like a cat, even the cat noises she makes.
THose comics were made AFTER Batman Returns
Yesyesyes, these things we always hear. It's not the killing, really. The 1940s Batman was not some depressed guy. As Bruce Wayne he was already a playboy with witty remarks. His interactions with Gordon and Julie Madison showed this. The "original Batman" threw out "one-liners" all the time. Hell, he even stopped to ask for the way once! Did I mention that this guy had friends? No. And in the original comics there was no Alfred. So. No.
Modern psychobabble. In the original comics he had a fiancee.
If you embrace Burton's depth you will see that she died but she has 9 lives or something like that! How clever! Zen galore!
it's S-T-U-P-I.D. Perhaps they (Knox and Vale) didn't know it, because they are to young but they could have just asked some older guy.
I don't need to. It's obvious that he is bending reality to fit his view.
I just point out "Catwoman has a long tradition of moving like a cat and making cat-like postures". He doesn't know it. Catwoman never acted like a cat. It's just not true.
Parents-Gun-Bat give it a rest you'll never beat a vet like El Payaso
Burton at least flipped through TKJ for Nicholson's direction. The Penguin was a reimagining altogether, and Catwoman was a hodge-podge. Nobody is denying that.
He was nothing like the comics.
A guy who sits in his chair and cries all the time because he has lost his parents 20 years ago is a loser.
It's just his view on Batman. Reading his introduction to his "Blind Justice" story gave me the same vibe.
Yeah, licked by radioactive cats.
How deep!!! That's almost "Burton" to me, you know "Hello There" / "Hell Here" like. What a genius!
Yeah? Then show me the comic where Bruce Wayne seems to suffer from something like the Asperger syndrome or some attention deficit thing. He was totally unsure of himself. oh, and when did Bruce Wayne ever wear glasses? Does he wear contact lenses when he is out to fight crime? That's just something they added to show us "Ohh sis guy is intelligent". How deep, Mr Burton!
I base it on the few scenes we see with "Bruce Wayne". He is a totally disturbed guy with some serious social phobias, it seems.
You know, dead girl, radioactive cats, resurrection
Or something like that.
Yesyesyes, these things we always hear. It's not the killing, really. The 1940s Batman was not some depressed guy.
As Bruce Wayne he was already a playboy with witty remarks. His interactions with Gordon and Julie Madison showed this. The "original Batman" threw out "one-liners" all the time. Hell, he even stopped to ask for the way once! Did I mention that this guy had friends? No. And in the original comics there was no Alfred. So. No.
Modern psychobabble. In the original comics he had a fiancee.
The truth is: Burton didn't really care about the source material, he tried to change everything to fit HIS vision.
And now? And why not? Afterall he used DEEP quotes like "You have a kind of dark side, don't yaa, Selina?" WOW! Sounds absolutely not forced! Romancing the stones!
Tim Burton himself admitted that he read Batman comics in order to do Batman 89. He mentioned The Killing Joke and The Dark Knight Returns apart from the Bob Kane era comics.
By your original statement: Tim Burton seemed to think that Batman should be some quirky, neurotic psycho with a death wish, not a heroic adventure, who is more altruistic in his goals. it seemed like you were.
Again, by your post you ruled out heroism when in fact was part of Burtons Batman. Batman had every reason to be tough against crime and heroic about innocent people.
Or making a movie called King Kong or Jaws and giving the giant gorilla and the shark less screentime than the human characters.
Now, on a second thought, the shark thing worked pretty well.
I still think that is a problem about pre-determined thought. More screentime not always means more prominence.
You see then how calling an actor a previous character name unrelated to the movie were discussing brings an uncalled feel of bashing to it. Criticism about the movie I can get them. To call Dee Williams Lando Calrissian is bashing the election of the actor merely because of some past roles. Which is totally unrelated to your criticism of his race vs the original characters race. Our next point btw.
So a comic can make such a change but not an adaptation? Any rerason for this biased authorization?
I have to ask, how is changing Harvey Dent to a Sicilian man is better or more acceptable than to change him to a black man?
Sharks and giant apes don't talk or actually "act".Or making a movie called King Kong or Jaws and giving the giant gorilla and the shark less screentime than the human characters.
Now, on a second thought, the shark thing worked pretty well.
I still think that is a problem about pre-determined thought. More screentime not always means more prominence.
You see then how calling an actor a previous character name unrelated to the movie were discussing brings an uncalled feel of bashing to it. Criticism about the movie I can get them. To call Dee Williams Lando Calrissian is bashing the election of the actor merely because of some past roles. Which is totally unrelated to your criticism of his race vs the original characters race. Our next point btw.
I have to ask, how is changing Harvey Dent to a Sicilian man is better or more acceptable than to change him to a black man?
If you read properly I was merely talking about the killing Batman issue. About that issue Im right pointing out the Bob Kane era as the influence.
Because for that matter, wheres the comics where Ducard as Ras al Ghul are the same? Or where Ras is Batmans original mentor? Or the comics where we meet Rachel Dawes the childhood Bruces little friend?
Does that (not being in a comic book) mean those elements didnt work? No. Well, except for Rachel dawes, but that because of Katie Homes.
But about the killing Batman issue, that DOES have a precedent in comic books.
TMC1982 said:Sharks and giant apes don't talk or actually "act".
I wasn't making a direct attack on Billy Dee Williams. My point is that, I don't think you should ("stunt") cast somebody just for the sake of having name recognition.
Not to add fuel to the fire, but...
Batman Returns rocked, and got very little wrong!!!
After all these years, i don't need to justify my reason and i don't think anyone needs to nitpick at the movie.
IMHO,Burton is a genuis who helped to re-invigorate YOUR favourite character for the general public. Don't like - Don't watch.
Not to add fuel to the fire, but...
Batman Returns rocked, and got very little wrong!!!
After all these years, i don't need to justify my reason and i don't think anyone needs to nitpick at the movie.
IMHO,Burton is a genuis who helped to re-invigorate YOUR favourite character for the general public. Don't like - Don't watch.
Sharks and giant apes don't talk or actually "act".
I wasn't making a direct attack on Billy Dee Williams. My point is that, I don't think you should ("stunt") cast somebody just for the sake of having name recognition.
It was never officially addressed what Harvey Dent's ethnic/nationality background was on "Batman: The Animated Series".
All that I'm saying is that, the animators seemed to design him that way.
They actually initially wanted Al Pacino to do the voice of Harvey Dent before settling on Richard Moll.
I'm not going waste my energy nitpicking every single aspect or detail of a comic book motion picture (concerning how accurate it is to the actual comics).
At the rate you're going, we might as well criticize "Batman Forever" for depicting Two-Face as the man responsible for the death of Dick Grayson's parents, not Tony Zucco.