Gamma Ray said:This guy wants everything that's wrong with comic-based flicks these days. Non-stop action does not a good movie make.
Matt said:Neither does making a remake of a 30 year old movie in sequel form
As with a lot of things, that remains to be seen.Matt said:Neither does making a remake of a 30 year old movie in sequel form
skruloos said:As with a lot of things, that remains to be seen.
Canadian-beauty said:I do think this movie will do well in the box office b/c the acting is very bad and the poor acting skills of some of the cast just stood out too much...
Ah! I kind of figured, but I thought I'd ask before ass-u-me ing. Too funny.hunter rider said:n't missed off me thinks Pat![]()
Milkman95 said:I commented on this clown in the SV thread - basically, he wants more action, less story, and Superman doing more "cool stuff". Great, I'm first in line for McG's Superman.........what a joke. This guy just needs to shut his bi-polar mouth...
Wheeellll... he did post his thoughts on his own msg board, so he's pretty much free to say whatever he wants. It's not like he was quoted in the NY Times or something LOL. Beisdes, it's really only the hard core comic fans who will see his comments, and arguably, those folks have already taken a stand one way or another with the pic.Milkman95 said:I commented on this clown in the SV thread - basically, he wants more action, less story, and Superman doing more "cool stuff". Great, I'm first in line for McG's Superman.........what a joke. This guy just needs to shut his bi-polar mouth...
hunter rider said:Come on,just because he doesn't think this is the way to go doesn't make his points any less valid
AgentPat said:Wheeellll... he did post his thoughts on his own msg board, so he's pretty much free to say whatever he wants. It's not like he was quoted in the NY Times or something LOL. Beisdes, it's really only the hard core comic fans who will see his comments, and arguably, those folks have already taken a stand one way or another with the pic.
How are they ignorant,i can see what he means about lack of wow moment and not wanting to see SuperdadMilkman95 said:Not any less valid, just ignorant is all, which is worse.
hunter rider said:How are they ignorant,i can see what he means about lack of wow moment and not wanting to see Superdad
hunter rider said:How are they ignorant,i can see what he means about lack of wow moment and not wanting to see Superdad
Milkman95 said:Because he hasn't seen the film or ANY of the action scenes within the film yet, that's why.
The Master said:It's not 100% confirmed as to whether or not the kid is Supes. Just pure speculation at this point.
BTW, love the Avatar![]()
hunter rider said:And ? he gave his feelings on the trailer which made him worried about the movie not the movie itself,ya know the way ppl on here go "The trailer owned,this movie is gonna rock the action is gonna be awesome spacey's Lex is the best ever"
The "wait and see the movie" line is the new "wait for the trailer" seems it's ok to claim greatness but not feel the movie is looking poor
Milkman95 said:He lacked professionalism, and basically reminded me of Sandy "Sour Grapes" Collora with is comments. It's not what he said about SR that bothered me, it was his thoughts on what would make a good Superman film - he sounded like a 6 year old wanting Superman to do "cool stuff" and have the story take a back seat. I found in funny is all..........
hunter rider said:If he'd gushed about it and said that this was exactly what a superman film should be and looked amazing would you feel the same ?
The only line i thought wass tupid was the one where he said "Superman isn't about his relationship with Lois Lane and their kid. It's about Superman doing 'cool ****' and "
Minus the kid part but that doesn't mean i think Singer went the right route either