Dread
TMNT 1984-2009
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2001
- Messages
- 21,788
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Dread, while I agree with your point about Ben Reilly and Kaine (but not Psylocke), I think it's pretty narrow-minded to say that using such characters is stupid/unnecessary simply because their peak was years ago. Isn't a big part of comics rejuvenating characters that have fallen by the wayside? Isn't that exactly what DnA have done with Nova and the entire cosmic universe?
Rejuvenating a character involves doing something different with them, not doing the same thing that was done 12-15 years ago. In the 90's, Marvel's angle for Eddie Brock was to make him a "lethal protector" - i.e. an anti-hero, who was all the rage in the 90's. It worked for a few years; albeit never enough to launch a Venom ongoing, but a string of annual mini's. It ran it's course by the end of the 90's and ended. Brock as a character has not been better for it. Now, ironically, I was a fan of Venom but I actually grew up and realized it wasn't handled well, and Venom's characterization was all over the place.
Now? Marvel is doing the same thing, just gave Venom a color swap and named him "Anti-Venom".
Nova, more to the point, did not represent a 90's editorial cluster**** of fear and loathing of a married Spider-Man, like Reilly did. He did not represent telling fans that the Spidey they loved for a generation was a worthless clone, and could they please stop whining and accept the new guy. If Brubaker displayed the prime example of how to do a "passing of the mask" story excellently in CAPTAIN AMERICA, then CLONE SAGA showed how to fail at it on every possible level.
Before ANNIHILATION, it had been some 5 years since Nova starred in a mini or ongoing attempt. By the time his ongoing came out afterward, it had been over 25 years since his original 70's run ended. He had had time to rest. More to the point, what was done with him was more unique than what had been done with him. By and large, most of Nova's stories took place on Earth, with him serving as a young hero with potential. The relaunch took him from Earth and finally had him step up. He also had not been destroyed or destroyed something else via historically bad editorial decisions.
More to the point, Joe Q uses Reilly fans as an excuse to justify any decision he has, because he goes, "Look, once upon the time, everyone hated the Clone Saga, and now fans come out of the woodwork and want it back! Therefore, anything someone may be critical of me for doing now will be popular years down the road, all criticism of my decisions is for naught and nothing I do is a misfire". And his logic isn't completely without reason. And that's the tragedy of it. You have to stop the cycle. If you want Joe Q to learn the impression that he is not King Midas who turns everything to gold, then you have to let go of some things. The "theory" of what Ben Reilly "coulda/shoulda" been is far superior to anything the character was or did in reality, and better than anything that can or could be done to him in the future. Let him go. Mindless nostalgia alone is not a strategy.
Much as, to be frank, if the Ultimate line's relaunch does well, Marvel will believe that ULTIMATUM was a successful story.
My overall point is that the comic book industry desperately needs new ideas, new strategies, and more innovation. Rehashing concepts that were running dry before Bill Clinton's second term is not the answer.