I can respect people who think she'd win but Carol and Thor at his peak are definitely in the same league. Like I set out yesterday, Carol has the advantage in some ways but there are multiple aspects where Thor has better feats
I really don't see how Thor is really in the same league as Carol anywhere to be honest. She is faster, stronger, more durable and has better energy projection.
She would have replicated his star feat with relative ease imo.
Tosh. Thor got a lot of feats in Ragnarok/Infinity War that were more than just visually cool. Some of them are comparable to stuff Carol's done or not far behind (e.g. surviving a power stone explosion meant to kill him,
We have no evidence that that explosion was intended to kill Thor. Most of the time when Thanos used the Power Stone he used it at a pretty low level, such as when he used it to knock down Bucky and Cap. The only times when he used it properly were when he busted the moon in IW and when he KO'd Carol in EG.
taking hits from Hulk without a scratch,
Hulk straight up KO'd him, and he was left with bruises afterwards.
flying through the outrider ships to destroy them),
Those were tiny compared to Thanos' flagship, which Carol obliterated with ease.
some of them are feats Carol has no equivalent to (e.g. enduring the "full force of a star",
As noted above, Carol would most likely have no trouble replicating this, and she would probably find it much easier than Thor did, given that her whole schtick is energy absorption.
throwing his axe through an Infinity Gauntlet beam and into Thanos chest).
That beam is totally unquantifiable. We have no idea how powerful it was. Also, the Russo's explicitly stated that Thanos was caught off balance by Thor and didn't use the Gauntlet to its full potential.
showed that an out of shape, alcoholic version of Thor who hadn't trained in 5 years was no match for Thanos. I'm pretty sure a fat, alcoholic version of Carol would be way weaker too.
As I've argued elsewhere, there's no real evidence (beyond what fans read into the movie) that Thor was any weaker in EG. He was no slower in combat than usual and IW already established that Thanos is a lot stronger than Thor.
And the same would likely apply to Carol if she were to spend five years playing Fortnite and drinking beer.
Carol tried to stop Thanos from snapping in Endgame, she was in the perfect position (holding the gauntlet open) and he outwitted her and one shotted her with the power stone.
Except Carol was a fighting a far more dangerous Thanos than the one in IW. IW Thanos was basically in second gear for the entire movie. He never really broke sweat or showed any sign of fear (including against Thor). EG Thanos, however, was far more ruthless and intending to kill every single one of the Avengers. He had no scruples about using the Stones to their full capacities and yet, even he was unable to do anything to Carol without the stones.
He didn't outwit her; he was legit fearing for his life and went for an all-out attack to try and save himself from a humiliating death.
And my point about Carol not failing if she were in Thor's shoes in IW still stands. I highly doubt that she would have made his mistake in not going for the head, and then just stand perfectly still like a dumb*** while he snaps his fingers.
Let me put it this way: do you honestly think that Thor could shrug off a headbutt from Thanos like Carol did?
In fact, I don't even have to answer that question since Thanos literally headbutted Thor to break out of Thor and Cap's attempt to restrain him. Thor was flung backwards and KTFO.
There's a reason why Cap and Nat sent Carol to rescue Tony and carry the Benatar back to Earth. She's the closest thing the MCU has to Superman and Thor (whether in Lebowski form or not) just can't compete.
and my post was not meant to be a personal dig just an observation.
