psylockolussus
Anchor of Earth-X
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2004
- Messages
- 59,507
- Reaction score
- 10,213
- Points
- 103
I don't think so. Just because there's a multiverse in the MCU, it doesn't mean it absorbs the previous Marvel film adaptations.
I don't think so. Just because there's a multiverse in the MCU, it doesn't mean it absorbs the previous Marvel film adaptations.
Hmmmm....
Nick Fury --- Valentina Allegra de Fontaine
Captain America --- US Agent
Hulk --- Abomination
Black Widow (Natasha) --- Black Widow (Yelena)
Iron Man --- ???
Thor --- ???
Hawkeye --- ???
Are we okay going to see Jennifer Garner as Elektra and Ben Affleck as Daredevil in the MCU? Okay maybe how about the 3 actors that played The Punisher in the movies?Agree to disagree. IMO it's pretty clear that it does, actually. Not just Marvel films, but every piece of media. You either think that the ending clearly indicates that with all the branching and everything else in the timeline, or it indicates none of it.
There are people who want to see Frank Castle in Armor Wars. I don't know if that character fits.
Are we okay going to see Jennifer Garner as Elektra and Ben Affleck as Daredevil in the MCU? Okay maybe how about the 3 actors that played The Punisher in the movies?
I will believe that when I see it. But fornow,what you are saying is nothing more than a speculation.
Its what you think is going to happen. You're stating it like its a fact.Loki spoilers just in case.
It's all speculation, but yes all those are part of the multiverse. They are not part of the sacred timeline, but they are all part of the Multiverse. They are all variants like there were a lot of Loki variants in the show and Kang mentioned infinite amount of variants of himself as well. I thought the show was very clear on that.
So yes, those are all part of the larger multiverse now. And Marvel also can't pick and choose to fit a narrative. If they are going to have multiple Peter Parkers show up in NWH then yeah, all other movies are part of this multiverse as well.
Its what you think is going to happen. You're stating it like its a fact.
And you do realize that certain previous Marvel films aren't owned by Disney and Sony?
I can't see how he fits at all. He's not an armoured baddie and he's not going to be standing in the place of Steve Rogers as the Captain who was trying to stop Iron Man from being a vigilante and taking down all these armoured foes. He would feel shoehorned in.
I can't see how he fits into the MCU period. The others would be easier.
I don't think so. Just because there's a multiverse in the MCU, it doesn't mean it absorbs the previous Marvel film adaptations.
Agree to disagree. IMO it's pretty clear that it does, actually. Not just Marvel films, but every piece of media. You either think that the ending clearly indicates that with all the branching and everything else in the timeline, or it indicates none of it.
I don't wish to step on anyone's toes here, but I don't believe anyone has stated facts; it's only possibilities, and with everything that's just happened on Loki, and everything that's going to happen with Strange 2, Ant Man 3 and Spider-Man 3, it's a high possibility that previous Marvel adaptations (regardless of who owns the rights) could very easily exist within the MCU Multiverse.Are we okay going to see Jennifer Garner as Elektra and Ben Affleck as Daredevil in the MCU? Okay maybe how about the 3 actors that played The Punisher in the movies?
I will believe that when I see it. But fornow,what you are saying is nothing more than a speculation.
The Incredible Hulk is definitely indeed part of the MCU from the get go. Hulk was just recast just like how War Machine was recast after 1 movie.
Well they're certainly going to great efforts to establish it . Bring back Willaim hurt as Thaddeus Thunderbolt Ross in Captain America: Civil War, Black Widow, Avengers Infinity War & Endgame. And now Tim Roth as Emil Blonskey aka Abomination in Shang-Chi and She-Hulk. Plus theirs strong rumors supporting that Betty Ross will reunite once more with Bruce Banner and Liv Tyler is interested in reprising her role.
I know that, I'm just saying that (if they wanted) they could bring Norton back as (a) Hulk from another Earth and that story could've taken place there, whilst Ruffalo's story could've differed somewhat, or even identical, except Bruce Banner looks different.The Incredible Hulk is definitely indeed part of the MCU from the get go. Hulk was just recast just like how War Machine was recast after 1 movie.
Hmmmm....
Nick Fury --- Valentina Allegra de Fontaine
Captain America --- US Agent
Hulk --- Abomination
Black Widow (Natasha) --- Black Widow (Yelena)
Iron Man --- ???
Thor --- ???
Hawkeye --- ???
That would just lead people to assume the 2008 movie was in the different reality (all this time) compare to the other phase 1 movies, which imo would be unnecessary.I know that, I'm just saying that (if they wanted) they could bring Norton back as (a) Hulk from another Earth and that story could've taken place there, whilst Ruffalo's story could've differed somewhat, or even identical, except Bruce Banner looks different.
In the same way that Peter Parker looks different x3.

Presumably within the multiverse you could have Ed Norton War Machine and Terrance Howard Hulk? Or more specifically, another Earth where Rhodes becomes Black(?) Hulk and Bruce Banner gets a green (maybe even organic) suit of armour?; Grassman... who's arch-enemy can be played by Jim Carey ... Lawnmower man.If they got Ed Norton as a Multiverse Hulk does that mean we'd get Multiverse Terence Howard Rhodey as well?
The trailer for Spidey 3 should have been out by now.Any chance the upcoming films get delayed again due to COVID?