• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

Sequels MCU Sinister Six - Kingpin?

XtremelyBaneful

xoxxxoooxo
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
16,613
Reaction score
1,647
Points
103
In the 90s Spiderman cartoon, there was a Sinister 6 that was referred to as the insidious 6. for whatever reason. and by the end of it, we learn that it was the kingpin that was behind it all.

If we're even still going to have a sinister 6, it'd be pointless to have it NOT in the mcu. Like, how would spiderman be a part of it then.

Because I know the biggest problem of all is kingpin not being spiderman related in the mcu because he's a tv character. if this sinister 6 thing is gonna even happen, it'll probably be after a spiderman trilogy.

so it's maybe a decade away, and by then i think it'd be easier to get kingpin and daredevil together.

whatever will happen with daredevil and kingpin could have happened by then. which would also make it easier by then i think also, to have daredevil and spiderman together
 
I not want Kingpin as leader. Dr Octopus need to be.

You misinterpreted, or I didn't word it well enough - I don't want kingpin to lead the S6 - sure, leave that for doc ock; I want kingpin to be the man behind the s6. the guy who hired them all to take spiderman down.
 
He said he doesn't want Kingpin replacing Ock as the leader. In the article Kingpin's actor says he's very unlikely to be in the movies. Problem solved.
 
He said he doesn't want Kingpin replacing Ock as the leader. In the article Kingpin's actor says he's very unlikely to be in the movies. Problem solved.
as the leader of a sinister 6, in a sinister 6 movie, not a solo spiderman movie which that article was about
 
Kingpin was never involved with the Sinister Six in the comics, I'd prefer it remain that way to be honest.
 
Kingpin was never involved with the Sinister Six in the comics, I'd prefer it remain that way to be honest.

oh he wasn't, I didn't know that. The idea I was proposing wouldn't have him directly involved, just a man in the shadows operating
 
as the leader of a sinister 6, in a sinister 6 movie, not a solo spiderman movie which that article was about

I doubt the circumstances for a Sinister Six movie would be any different.
 
oh he wasn't, I didn't know that. The idea I was proposing wouldn't have him directly involved, just a man in the shadows operating

I get what you're saying, I'd rather have Octavius as the sole leader personally, though.

I think having the Kingpin be behind literally everything is one of the weaknesses of the 1990s show.
 
Even if he did have a baller voice.
 
Even if he did have a baller voice.

Oh, for sure.

And he was used well often, I just thought it got a bit ridiculous and cliche to see him behind EVERY SINGLE PLOT, especially as it progressed into the later seasons.
 
I get what you're saying, I'd rather have Octavius as the sole leader personally, though.

I think having the Kingpin be behind literally everything is one of the weaknesses of the 1990s show.

gotcha, well that's that. i think the more important thing here is that if a sinister 6 movie is made, whether or not it's set in the mcu. if it is NOT, then i think making it is a bad ass idea
 
gotcha, well that's that. i think the more important thing here is that if a sinister 6 movie is made, whether or not it's set in the mcu. if it is NOT, then i think making it is a bad ass idea

Oh, no doubt. A non-MCU canon Sinister Six movie would be confusing to the GA and awful for fans.
 
Calling it now, MCU 6 will consist of Shocker, Ock, Vulture, hopefully a proper Rhino and Lizard and if we're lucky debut Mysterio.


If by then the netflix/movie barrier has softened then maybe we'll see Kingpin involved in someway.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"