Marvel united
Mutant and proud
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2017
- Messages
- 8,940
- Reaction score
- 5,944
- Points
- 103
Honestly, this is how I feel about Erik. Fox played their hand with him, and the X-Men could definitely use a breather.I don't think Destiny would be leader of the Brotherhood, however she'd be an important member.
I kind of hope they'll stay away from Mystique for a while, or at the very least push her into the background.
Mystique I agree. Raven should have a presence but they should keep her appearance under wraps, which leaves Irene. It's unconventional but that's what makes it interesting imo. There's a lot you can do with her backstory as a lesbian and a woman (with a disability), who has been fighting this fight longer than most of the X-Men have probably been alive.
It depends on the qualities you're looking to embody. I'd go for a Spielbergian vibe, and cast a child actress (13-16 yo) as Rogue. Leaning into her innocence as a kid who is simply led down the wrong path.I always have trouble when it comes to casting Rogue. Some actors/actresses, you can just look at them and almost envision how their portrayal of a particular character will be, I've yet to see an actress that makes me think "that's Rogue without a doubt". At the minute, I kind of have Tuppence Middleton cast as Rogue, not as outgoing as portrayed in the animated series, but not as timid as Paquin's version in the Fox movies, but it's still not "that is absolutely who I would have to play the character".
Xavier's would be a chance for her to recover from her trauma, and use those pent up emotions to help people, instead of hurt.
Well, ofc all mutants aren't kids but coming of age is one of X-Men's defining themes. Tied to the expression of the gene itself.I'd go older but have a few younger members. Some themes are played better by older actors whereas younger actors tend to be a little melodramatic in execution.
I think a sincere portrayal of Dukes can work.I would also go for the Lance Alvers version of Avalanche, and maybe also Evolution's Blob and Toad too. However the movie might get accused of "fat shaming" with Blob's character.
Most mutant powers have a tradeoff. Frederick Dukes is amazingly strong and invulnerable, but at the cost him being tremendously overweight (the movie can treat his insecurities with gravitas, and even redeem him by the end. Rogue doesn't have to be the only defector).
- Toad is in a similar situation. He can jump 2 stories, scale walls, has a prehensile tongue? but they come at the cost of him looking like a freak.
- Jean Grey can move things with her mind, and read OTHER people's minds... But at the cost of total sensory overload; a war with her own mind.
- Ororo can control the weather, and atmosphere, and do all sorts of amazing things... But at the cost of a full range of emotions, since they are tied to her powers.
- Cyclops... Self explanatory.
These mutations are extraordinary, some even godlike, but they were not made to hold in a fragile human society, and are thus subject to social rejection. Mutants are nature's design but mankind is in constant conflict with nature
That's why I love the inherent dichotomy between the X-Men and the Sentinels. Because it's Nature vs Man. Technology vs Biology. Humans vs the natural order of life.


