Nintendo saw a violation of property instead of seeing this as it truly was: a love-letter/film to fans about one of the greatest game series of all time. A series that everyone at Massive State truly cherished. And all they wanted to do was take the series to an unexplored medium.
I'm sure that's how most would it see but Nintendo isn't looking at it emotionally as a labor of love. They're thinking of the legal and financial consequences it could have on them.
People have become rigid in their thinking that the moment something like this happens they oppose it. "It won't work!", "It'll get shut down!", "It'll stink! they'll cry instead of saying "I wonder if this could work?"
It being a Nintendo IP, I think people were very skeptical it wouldn't be shutdown by Nintendo. And there's just general skepticism of ambitious fan/indy films in general.
Obviously not everyone objected and I praise everyone who dedicated to this project. I'm just wondering what kind of message this will send out to everyone, cause to me this says "You can dream, you can have big ideas, just don't share it with anyone".
And that's sad.
There's nothing wrong with big dreams, but you need to know how to achieve them in a realistic way. It's very difficult to bring a new idea from the outside to a company, they don't want them because of potential legal issues.
Hippie's post was very blunt, probably more than necessary, but I think his points were right. People would be skeptical because it's a Nintendo IP and they have a reputation of nipping fan projects in the bud, regardless of how talented the creators are and how well they present their project.
With Kickstarter, I'm not referring to their project specifically (I honestly didn't see their page before it was taken down), but I've soured on it from when it first started. Originally, it was more that people had projects and just needed some extra funding and looked to people who were interested. I think projects like OUYA, Pebble Watch, and Double-Fine game have ruined it. Those projects made millions and people expect that they can fund theirs entirely from Kickstarter, which I think is very dangerous. Then they add stretch-goals, a carrot on a string, to get more. It's become a concern that Kickstarter had to release a statement on it recently.
Kickstarter should just help projects get some additional funding to complete their project, it shouldn't be the majority of their budget. When it is, it becomes some sort of scheme. The backers are investors but there is little to no accountability on the creator's part to deliver the product on time, if at all, or refund them. Again, this is just my opinion of the trend Kickstarter seems to be going, not a statement on this specific project.