The Amazing Spider-Man Moviehole scoops details on both scripts...

NO

raimi and company left meaning they had no franchise/Star/director

Rebooting it means a sure fresh start and 3 more films so marvel cant touch it

same reason fox is making all these x men films

you think fox is making deadpool and first class because people were asking for it

Umm... yes? If no one was asking for them, the audience wasn't there, how would that make them money? Again, you make no sense.

No, Raimi leaving doesn't really mean ****. If Sony really were *****es, they could of done a Fox/X3/Singer/Ratner deal and still released it. It makes no difference to them.
 
Moviehole has details on both scripts.

Basically for SM4:
- Spider-man 4 DID feature Peter and Mary-Jane with a baby.
- Vulturess was added in the script, at the request of the studio.
- Vulturess was a retooled version of Black Cat.
- Vulture was the editor of the Daily Bugle.
- Script was apparently pure crap.
- Raimi had lost hope in the project and walked.
- The studio also wanted to add a third villain.
- Anne Hathaway was gone from the project late last year (my guess is when Sony turned the Black Cat into the Vulturess).

And THIS is why I trusted Raimi. He knew this was going to be crap, so he walked. Good choice. Why Sony was shoving this stuff down his throat is beyond me. I would have walked too.

This reboot being more like TDK, though? DO NOT WANT.
 
It's not really all that absurd. Sony and any other studio would do anything for money.
If that's the case, why not go ahead with Spider-Man 4; the sequel to a film that grossed 891M WW (a then-record for comic films)? Why bother changing directions and bringing about a reboot if concerns didn't go beyond financial interests? Yet, here we are with a reboot.
 
I'm talking in other media. making a movie or an animatied series is much harder accomplish

What?

Those two stories are WIDELY claimed by Spidey fans and comic book fans to be the best stories Spidey has ever been in.

And they are not light hearted fluff.
 
If that's the case, why not go ahead with Spider-Man 4; the sequel to a film that grossed 891M WW (a then-record for comic films)? Why bother changing directions and bringing about a reboot if concerns didn't go beyond financial interests? Yet, here we are with a reboot.

EXACTLY!!!!! CHRIST SAKE!!!!!!

But Raimi lovers are blinded to this fact.
 
If that's the case, why not go ahead with Spider-Man 4; the sequel to a film that grossed 891M WW (a then-record for comic films)? Why bother changing directions and bringing about a reboot if concerns didn't go beyond financial interests? Yet, here we are with a reboot.

Tobey would not come back if raimi was gone which means there goes your star
 
And THIS is why I trusted Raimi. He knew this was going to be crap, so he walked. Good choice. Why Sony was shoving this stuff down his throat is beyond me. I would have walked too.

This reboot being more like TDK, though? DO NOT WANT.

The only thing the studio pushed on Raimi was Vultress.

All those other terrible ideas like Vulture being editor of the Bugle. Black Cat being his daughter. And Pete and MJ having a baby? ALL Raimi's ideas.
 
not he was'nt stop acting as if this is fact only thing that came out based off moviehole of all sites lol

was he wanted vulture as the villain
 
What? No. It was in the plot outline that was released last week when it was revealed it was delayed.

Seriously, stop brown nosing Raimi and see sense.
 
EXACTLY!!!!! CHRIST SAKE!!!!!!

But Raimi lovers are blinded to this fact.

I adore Sam Raimi, but I would not want a Spider-Man 4 with that crappy script. Why are people still blaming Raimi on this though? Sony was pushing for this stuff to happen! Raimi bowed out. He made the right choice. Why is he still getting criticized?

What kind of drugs was the company taking when they came up with the Vultress? Was that REALLY the best they could come up with? If that really is the best Spider-Man 4 script they could muster, then I applaud Raimi for getting out of it!

I'm not blind, I'm just mad at Sony that they backed themselves into a corner that left them no other choice but to do a reboot. It did not have to come to this.
 
And? You think the Spider-Man films made so much money JUST because of Tobey ****ing MacGuire?

:funny: :hehe: :funny:
Not for nothing, almost everyone that i talked to about these movies and the people who like them say "I can't imagine anyone else playing Spidey."

Just saying.
 
Tobey would not come back if raimi was gone which means there goes your star
Exactly. If it was solely important to milk the Raimi tree for all it was worth and go for nothing but a cash grab, Sony would have blinked before Raimi left. They would have caved, just counted on another huge pay day and waited for the box office results. Instead, the studio held its ground. Knowing that Maguire had indicated he wasn't in working with another direction, they still didn't budge. If the only concern is money, why not give the golden goose what he wants?

Word is they planned some sort of reboot starting with Spider-Man 5. This includes getting a guy to pen the fifth and sixth films that Raimi allegedly wasn't all that interested in working with. The idea of a reboot isn't entirely out of the blue. Just ahead of schedule.
 
exactly AOK is acting like Sony let Raimi do everything and he is all to blame and Sony is someone how innocent
 
I adore Sam Raimi, but I would not want a Spider-Man 4 with that crappy script. Why are people still blaming Raimi on this though? Sony was pushing for this stuff to happen! Raimi bowed out. He made the right choice. Why is he still getting criticized?

What kind of drugs was the company taking when they came up with the Vultress? Was that REALLY the best they could come up with? If that really is the best Spider-Man 4 script they could muster, then I applaud Raimi for getting out of it!

I'm not blind, I'm just mad at Sony that they backed themselves into a corner that left them no other choice but to do a reboot. It did not have to come to this.

Yes Sony came up with Vultress. And that was ridiculous.

BUT Raimi also came up with the TERRIBLE idea to make Vulture the editor of the Bugle. HE came up with the terrible idea to give Pete and MJ a baby, which would inevitably lead to MORE relationship melodrama crap AND Pete wanting to quit as Spidey... AGAIN!

Raimi and HIS writer wrote that TERRIBLE script. Sony wanted to change Black Cat to Vultress. That's all they wanted. And Raimi walked.
 
Not for nothing, almost everyone that i talked to about these movies and the people who like them say "I can't imagine anyone else playing Spidey."

Just saying.

But you can bet your ass they would still go to see the new Spider-Man film.
 
yes but Sony ok'd the script quit acting like Sony is not responsible they are the damn studio putting the film out
 
Sony and Raimi were both responsible.

people need to chill out
 
I actually wouldn't mind a darker tone if the villian were lizard. a darker tone would actually suit the subject matter. I really wanted sam to tackle the lizard though as it plays to his horror strengths. oh well.

the D9 director would be perfect for a lizard centeric movie
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"