Spider-ManHero12
Web-Slinger
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2006
- Messages
- 47,238
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 31
Exactly!he is just annoyed at people jumping on the reboot bandwagon when something does'nt go there way just like that and i dont blame him.
Exactly!he is just annoyed at people jumping on the reboot bandwagon when something does'nt go there way just like that and i dont blame him.
NO
raimi and company left meaning they had no franchise/Star/director
Rebooting it means a sure fresh start and 3 more films so marvel cant touch it
same reason fox is making all these x men films
you think fox is making deadpool and first class because people were asking for it
Moviehole has details on both scripts.
Basically for SM4:
- Spider-man 4 DID feature Peter and Mary-Jane with a baby.
- Vulturess was added in the script, at the request of the studio.
- Vulturess was a retooled version of Black Cat.
- Vulture was the editor of the Daily Bugle.
- Script was apparently pure crap.
- Raimi had lost hope in the project and walked.
- The studio also wanted to add a third villain.
- Anne Hathaway was gone from the project late last year (my guess is when Sony turned the Black Cat into the Vulturess).
If that's the case, why not go ahead with Spider-Man 4; the sequel to a film that grossed 891M WW (a then-record for comic films)? Why bother changing directions and bringing about a reboot if concerns didn't go beyond financial interests? Yet, here we are with a reboot.It's not really all that absurd. Sony and any other studio would do anything for money.
I'm talking in other media. making a movie or an animatied series is much harder accomplish
If that's the case, why not go ahead with Spider-Man 4; the sequel to a film that grossed 891M WW (a then-record for comic films)? Why bother changing directions and bringing about a reboot if concerns didn't go beyond financial interests? Yet, here we are with a reboot.
If that's the case, why not go ahead with Spider-Man 4; the sequel to a film that grossed 891M WW (a then-record for comic films)? Why bother changing directions and bringing about a reboot if concerns didn't go beyond financial interests? Yet, here we are with a reboot.
And THIS is why I trusted Raimi. He knew this was going to be crap, so he walked. Good choice. Why Sony was shoving this stuff down his throat is beyond me. I would have walked too.
This reboot being more like TDK, though? DO NOT WANT.
Tobey would not come back if raimi was gone which means there goes your star
And? You think the Spider-Man films made so much money JUST because of Tobey ****ing MacGuire?
![]()
![]()
![]()
EXACTLY!!!!! CHRIST SAKE!!!!!!
But Raimi lovers are blinded to this fact.
lets recast bale if nolan does'nt come back![]()
Not for nothing, almost everyone that i talked to about these movies and the people who like them say "I can't imagine anyone else playing Spidey."And? You think the Spider-Man films made so much money JUST because of Tobey ****ing MacGuire?
![]()
![]()
![]()
Exactly. If it was solely important to milk the Raimi tree for all it was worth and go for nothing but a cash grab, Sony would have blinked before Raimi left. They would have caved, just counted on another huge pay day and waited for the box office results. Instead, the studio held its ground. Knowing that Maguire had indicated he wasn't in working with another direction, they still didn't budge. If the only concern is money, why not give the golden goose what he wants?Tobey would not come back if raimi was gone which means there goes your star
lets recast bale if nolan does'nt come back![]()
I adore Sam Raimi, but I would not want a Spider-Man 4 with that crappy script. Why are people still blaming Raimi on this though? Sony was pushing for this stuff to happen! Raimi bowed out. He made the right choice. Why is he still getting criticized?
What kind of drugs was the company taking when they came up with the Vultress? Was that REALLY the best they could come up with? If that really is the best Spider-Man 4 script they could muster, then I applaud Raimi for getting out of it!
I'm not blind, I'm just mad at Sony that they backed themselves into a corner that left them no other choice but to do a reboot. It did not have to come to this.
no, but I'd think it would be insane if the movies were popular because of him. Listen to that damn voice in TDK. I mean, he sounded like a damn monster.You think the Bat movies are so popular JUST because of Bale?
![]()
![]()
![]()
Not for nothing, almost everyone that i talked to about these movies and the people who like them say "I can't imagine anyone else playing Spidey."
Just saying.