New Live Action Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Movie In The Works? - Part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
i love the bad boys films:o

I always liked the first one but the second one was pretty damn terrible. Saw it once and that was really more than enough. I haven't liked any of his other movies either (including the first TF) to be honest. Though I think I'm one of the few people on earth that felt that The Island actually had it's interesting moments as opposed to just being "BANG BANG BOOM [insert ****** humor] BOOM BOOM" like the majority of his resume.
 
I always liked the first one but the second one was pretty damn terrible. Saw it once and that was really more than enough. I haven't liked any of his other movies either (including the first TF) to be honest. Though I think I'm one of the few people on earth that felt that The Island actually had it's interesting moments as opposed to just being "BANG BANG BOOM [insert ****** humor] BOOM BOOM" like the majority of his resume.

Then I guess it should be refreshing for you that this isn't directed by him.
 
When did I ever say that it was?

Didn't say you did, I'm just confused as to why everyone continues to discuss the producer of this project over the director/writers/creator crafting the story. Honestly, Bay is a spokesman, it's his company. He's as affiliated with this as Adam Sandler is with Grandma's Boy. As in: He foots the bill, because this is a property that can likely raise some cash for him, and probably does little else outside of it.

Like I've said before I was actually shocked finding out that Michael Bay has hardcore fans. I mean I actually like some of his movies but being in love with his overall work? Damn that's confusing.

Christopher Nolan being the most notable among them, actually. Arm-chair critics should take note by kicking back and at least wait until we see if this is TMNT 3 all over again.

See, here's the thing I don't understand. In the 80s/90s bad movies were acceptable to a majority of us. Literally, as in, classics to us. I'm a writer by trade (mainly a critic I must confess) and a majority of the things I grew up with were hollow pieces of trash with zero existential bull and little to no growth in characters. Heck, the plot was there simply as an excuse for action to happen in the first place.

...Some of the most important movies that fall under those descriptors are the original Ninja Turtles films. (Clocking in around, what, 40% on RT on the high side? Deservedly so, I might add.) Somewhere along the line we stop accepting that in favor of whining excessively that every character deserves some deep, grounded, emotional tale. Personally, Bay (if he does have any input; and I believe his involvement is extremely small considering his own projects are in the works) and Co. are kind of perfect for the late 80s/early 90s flair that the original two flicks were. Sure, buried in there, there was a good idea, and sure, I felt for Raph and I cried for Splinter. I was also 3 or 4 years old.

This property is near and dear to me, I love it with all my being. Great story telling is the least of what it has ever (and I mean ever) had to offer. What brings to the table is an interesting family dynamic between characters, a great revenge/avenging scenario, and four gigantic mutant turtles that crack-wise and in some interpretations indulge on pizza while shouting surfer-lingo and throwing around high-fives. Don't expect it to get overwhelming praise from critics and fans alike, honestly, it shouldn't. It should be fun, not cinema magic. It's the movie/comic/cartoon equivalent to a rollercoaster ride. Instead sit back and let your inner-kid overwhelm your being and have fun with it.


...Seriously, action is kind of up Jonathan Liebesman's alley, heck his alien flick was a 2 hour action scene (that was beautifully shot, the script was simply horrible.) So now that we have the writers of MI:4 mixed the styling of Kevin Eastman (who does not enjoy wedging in strange, awkward material like gigantic Triceratops aliens who invade Earth, unlike Laid,) and Michael Bay-light (who does, to my knowledge, not wedge in super models out of no where), I think we're in for a fun ride honestly.

But hey, I guess I suffer from optimism.
 
Last edited:
Didn't say you did, I'm just confused as to why everyone continues to discuss the producer of this project over the director/writers/creator crafting the story. Honestly, Bay is a spokesman, it's his company. He's as affiliated with this as Adam Sandler is with Grandma's Boy. As in: He foots the bill, because this is a property that can likely raise some cash for him, and probably does little else outside of it.

I was referring to someone specifically talking about the quality of Bay's films and not THIS movie. However it's pretty obvious that the reasons "everyone continues to discuss the producer of this project" is because he's the biggest name involved with it and has been the only official face for it so far.

I think most people know that he's not the writer or director of the thing but most people also know that a lot of other projects from his production company in the past were pure turds. For that reason alone I don't give a damn about this movie and I'm a turtles fan. They could make them iguanas instead of turtles if they want I don't give a **** cause I get my turtles fix elsewhere anyway.

I haven't liked one thing from platinum dunes nor did I like the movie by the director of this new turtles movie either. When I put those 2 factors together I know that my time is better off spent watching something I'm interested in than something that I don't care about at all.
 
Personally I enjoy TF1, Bad Boys, Armageddon and The Rock. But they are all 3/5 movies, he has never reached higher than that.
 
Didn't say you did, I'm just confused as to why everyone continues to discuss the producer of this project over the director/writers/creator crafting the story. Honestly, Bay is a spokesman, it's his company. He's as affiliated with this as Adam Sandler is with Grandma's Boy. As in: He foots the bill, because this is a property that can likely raise some cash for him, and probably does little else outside of it.



Christopher Nolan being the most notable among them, actually. Arm-chair critics should take note by kicking back and at least wait until we see if this is TMNT 3 all over again.

See, here's the thing I don't understand. In the 80s/90s bad movies were acceptable to a majority of us. Literally, as in, classics to us. I'm a writer by trade (mainly a critic I must confess) and a majority of the things I grew up with were hollow pieces of trash with zero existential bull and little to no growth in characters. Heck, the plot was there simply as an excuse for action to happen in the first place.

...Some of the most important movies that fall under those descriptors are the original Ninja Turtles films. (Clocking in around, what, 40% on RT on the high side? Deservedly so, I might add.) Somewhere along the line we stop accepting that in favor of whining excessively that every character deserves some deep, grounded, emotional tale. Personally, Bay (if he does have any input; and I believe his involvement is extremely small considering his own projects are in the works) and Co. are kind of perfect for the late 80s/early 90s flair that the original two flicks were. Sure, buried in there, there was a good idea, and sure, I felt for Raph and I cried for Splinter. I was also 3 or 4 years old.

This property is near and dear to me, I love it with all my being. Great story telling is the least of what it has ever (and I mean ever) had to offer. What brings to the table is an interesting family dynamic between characters, a great revenge/avenging scenario, and four gigantic mutant turtles that crack-wise and in some interpretations indulge on pizza while shouting surfer-lingo and throwing around high-fives. Don't expect it to get overwhelming praise from critics and fans alike, honestly, it shouldn't. It should be fun, not cinema magic. It's the movie/comic/cartoon equivalent to a rollercoaster ride. Instead sit back and let your inner-kid overwhelm your being and have fun with it.


...Seriously, action is kind of up Jonathan Liebesman's alley, heck his alien flick was a 2 hour action scene (that was beautifully shot, the script was simply horrible.) So now that we have the writers of MI:4 mixed the styling of Kevin Eastman (who does not enjoy wedging in strange, awkward material like gigantic Triceratops aliens who invade Earth, unlike Laid,) and Michael Bay-light (who does, to my knowledge, not wedge in super models out of no where), I think we're in for a fun ride honestly.

But hey, I guess I suffer from optimism.

yes-rudy1.gif
 
I was referring to someone specifically talking about the quality of Bay's films and not THIS movie. However it's pretty obvious that the reasons "everyone continues to discuss the producer of this project" is because he's the biggest name involved with it and has been the only official face for it so far.

I think most people know that he's not the writer or director of the thing but most people also know that a lot of other projects from his production company in the past were pure turds. For that reason alone I don't give a damn about this movie and I'm a turtles fan. They could make them iguanas instead of turtles if they want I don't give a **** cause I get my turtles fix elsewhere anyway.

I haven't liked one thing from platinum dunes nor did I like the movie by the director of this new turtles movie either. When I put those 2 factors together I know that my time is better off spent watching something I'm interested in than something that I don't care about at all.

Good man! You have logic going on there for you then as to your reasoning. Also, I wasn't attacking you before, or questioning you.

Still, him being a notable name shouldn't override common sense in this mass hysteria that everyone is falling into. Spielberg's cred wasn't ruined for Transformers. Likewise this flick should be given it's chance despite Bay's company being involved.

I'm with you there with Platinum Dunes. I liked the new Elm Street, surprisingly, but the rest of their material was bleeeerrgh for me. However, I don't tend to go on track records myself (understand why you do), after all, I've hated everything before/after Louis Leterrier did The Incredible Hulk but found myself in love with the flick.



I think I just peed out of laughter.
 
Last edited:
I'm with you there with Platinum Dunes. I liked the new Elm Street, surprisingly, but the rest of their material was bleeeerrgh for me. However, I don't tend to go on track records myself (understand why you do), after all, I've hated everything before/after Louis Leterrier did The Incredible Hulk but found myself in love with the flick.

Platinum Dunes was my biggest misgiving about the project until Aliengate (which has now thankfully passed). The track record is just not good at all.

But I thik Leibesmen is actually a pretty decent choice for the film. As long as the script is strong, I have faith he can make a great looking film.
 
i didn't see the new elm street but i saw bay's texas and friday and both were bad

to me bay's only re-watchable film is armageddon but maybe thats because i am a bruce willis fan. not sure about Leibesmen battle:la was ok, it lacked something not sure what but on the other hand i am really jacked for wrath of the titans
 
I thought both Platnium Dunes' TCMs were pretty good. Friday the 13th is what I wanted from a F13 movie. Elm Street was bad. There were some good things about it, but it was bad.

I'm looking forward to Ninja Turtles. A bunch of people complain about it, but they'll be first in line to see it. That's how it always is.
 
i didn't see the new elm street but i saw bay's texas and friday and both were bad

to me bay's only re-watchable film is armageddon but maybe thats because i am a bruce willis fan. not sure about Leibesmen battle:la was ok, it lacked something not sure what but on the other hand i am really jacked for wrath of the titans

Again, they weren't Bay's. And yes, Friday was ABYSMAL to me, but then again I never was big into the series. Cool idea with a little mini-movie before the movie but it was more softcore porn than it was a movie.

Wrath of the Titans doesn't appeal to me, but it looks leagues better than the first.
 
Eastman.



He's a decent director that tends to take on crappy movies. Everything I've heard about Wrath of the Titans is that it's shot well, but the script is terrible. Everything hinges on the script for this movie.

But what were you expecting with the Turtles? Christopher Nolan? I mean come on.

I don't think anyone expected Nolan, but someone with a good track record at least. A good director will accept good scripts or will make changes to a **** script. I say Liebesman is the kind of director that takes anything that's offered to him and listens to every word the studios says. Even though Lebesman will be directing, Bay will have the real power behind this project.
 
Didn't say you did, I'm just confused as to why everyone continues to discuss the producer of this project over the director/writers/creator crafting the story. Honestly, Bay is a spokesman, it's his company. He's as affiliated with this as Adam Sandler is with Grandma's Boy. As in: He foots the bill, because this is a property that can likely raise some cash for him, and probably does little else outside of it.



Christopher Nolan being the most notable among them, actually. Arm-chair critics should take note by kicking back and at least wait until we see if this is TMNT 3 all over again.

See, here's the thing I don't understand. In the 80s/90s bad movies were acceptable to a majority of us. Literally, as in, classics to us. I'm a writer by trade (mainly a critic I must confess) and a majority of the things I grew up with were hollow pieces of trash with zero existential bull and little to no growth in characters. Heck, the plot was there simply as an excuse for action to happen in the first place.

...Some of the most important movies that fall under those descriptors are the original Ninja Turtles films. (Clocking in around, what, 40% on RT on the high side? Deservedly so, I might add.) Somewhere along the line we stop accepting that in favor of whining excessively that every character deserves some deep, grounded, emotional tale. Personally, Bay (if he does have any input; and I believe his involvement is extremely small considering his own projects are in the works) and Co. are kind of perfect for the late 80s/early 90s flair that the original two flicks were. Sure, buried in there, there was a good idea, and sure, I felt for Raph and I cried for Splinter. I was also 3 or 4 years old.

This property is near and dear to me, I love it with all my being. Great story telling is the least of what it has ever (and I mean ever) had to offer. What brings to the table is an interesting family dynamic between characters, a great revenge/avenging scenario, and four gigantic mutant turtles that crack-wise and in some interpretations indulge on pizza while shouting surfer-lingo and throwing around high-fives. Don't expect it to get overwhelming praise from critics and fans alike, honestly, it shouldn't. It should be fun, not cinema magic. It's the movie/comic/cartoon equivalent to a rollercoaster ride. Instead sit back and let your inner-kid overwhelm your being and have fun with it.


...Seriously, action is kind of up Jonathan Liebesman's alley, heck his alien flick was a 2 hour action scene (that was beautifully shot, the script was simply horrible.) So now that we have the writers of MI:4 mixed the styling of Kevin Eastman (who does not enjoy wedging in strange, awkward material like gigantic Triceratops aliens who invade Earth, unlike Laid,) and Michael Bay-light (who does, to my knowledge, not wedge in super models out of no where), I think we're in for a fun ride honestly.

But hey, I guess I suffer from optimism.

GREAT ****ing Post Man :up:
 
I don't ask for much. I just hope the Turtles won't get the Transformers treatment.
 
exactly, not asking for him to do a tmnt clone but i just want him to bring his A game for once and i would say TF1 was him bringing his B game
 
I don't think anyone expected Nolan, but someone with a good track record at least. A good director will accept good scripts or will make changes to a **** script. I say Liebesman is the kind of director that takes anything that's offered to him and listens to every word the studios says. Even though Lebesman will be directing, Bay will have the real power behind this project.

Exactly.

And TBH, I think Bay for is perfect for this. The type of humor he puts in his films is right for turtles IMO.
 
The type of humor he puts in his films is right for turtles IMO.

Are you serious? If the humor is anywhere the level of TF2&3, then I'm done with the Movie. Because every single person will be reduced to comic relief.
 
but his choices aren't always the best
skids-and-mudflap-01.jpg


and this human fish
Transformers-3-Dark-of-the-Moon-Carly_1303839663.jpg

1292324332_126830061_1-Pictures-of--spotted-sailfin-pelco-sucker-fish-for-sale-1292324332.jpg

shim.gif
 
Exactly.

And TBH, I think Bay for is perfect for this. The type of humor he puts in his films is right for turtles IMO.

raciest, crude tweener humour?

yeah because i remember mikey making jokes about balls and busting a cap in the foots ass
 
I can't believe any of you think Michael Bay is going to have any type of say in this movie with the amount of work he has coming up. Its like when people thought Nolan was going to be pulling the strings on Superman when he had Batman coming up. Its like you guys want something to complain about so you go straight for Bay. He will have nothing to do with this movie besides his production company producing it. This will be a lot like when Steven Spielberg produces movies. He gets his name on there which is protection from the studio so they make the movie they want, and then he shows up on set every once and a while and maybe makes a suggestion or two.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"