How dare they do Anya so dirty
Honestly, if the talk is about getting some money out of the project, it doesn't make sense to spend money on reshoots. Either they think the reshoots will result in a profitable film or they should release what they have.So I wonder if they have decided to scrap the reshoots and just release the Boone cut?
apparently is Kinberg who doesnt like what Boone did.
if true, this is a joke, He's the main producer and agreed on Boone's vision on first place, and now he doesnt like it? yiiiiikes, this man is stupid in new levels
What a disaster.Kinberg simply signed off on Boone's vision. Boone created a film so bad that EVEN Kinberg recognized just how awful it was after he had seen it.
But most importantly, let us not be led to believe that Kinberg was the only one who was disgusted by what Boone had presented. Most everyone that has seen it thought it was at the very least mediocre, and that is a very generous description of JB's steaming pile of horror.
When Boone's cut started circulating, he & the movie became something of a laughingstock at Fox. Everyone rightfully lost confidence in Boone.
Before Boone bamboozled Kinberg & the others, New Mutants was an entirely different movie. It was to be a BIG project. A culmination of years of work. The first non bastardized take on an X-Men team.
A wild mixture of Ferris Bueller, Zombieland, & the New Mutants. It was to be over the top, violent, ironic & hilarious all at the same time. This was a movie that would have easily topped any of the X-Men films that Fox has put out. This would've been something we could've built a franchise out of. But Boone came in, said he could do it on the cheap & of course Fox went with the cheaper, easiest option. Oh well. Twas not to be. Not yet at least....
from twitter. X-Brickz @BrickheadzX
"I'm not sure how much the original cut was the super powered horror film people were expecting. A friend of mine was in a test screening for New Mutants, and he said he didn't know that it was supposed to be a horror movie until he watched the trailer afterwards. /1"
"Without spoiling anything, he described it as "A romantic dramedy with a little Breakfast Club thrown in. Really lethargic pacing. Occasional bursts of PG-13 'scares'." /2"
I just asked him and he said "4.5/10, nothing offensive".
He said it wasn't "Catwoman bad", but mostly "awkward" and "boring" with a few good performances from some of the cast.
many viewers/fans found X1 boring, even today, some general fans find Bryan's X-Men movies boring. So I dont take that description as a bad sign per se.
What to some may be boring, maybe to me its real and good character development, and honestly, I care more about that than actual horror elements. What I care about the most its the characters, not the tone.
Kinberg agreed on Josh Trank F4 vision. then he wasnt happy and jumped in to "improve it"
Kinberg agreed on Boone's NM vision. then wasnt happy and the studio wanted him to improve it.
same patern. Same studio ****, same guy to "save the movies". What a mess of a studio, man.... what a mess.