Tempest19
Superhero
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2006
- Messages
- 7,350
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
good for you, some of us actually have a job . Oh noes, you watches more mofies than me
I have a job, a life, everything- not my fault that I come from a richer family than you Sava and inherited alot of $$$ when I was born into this world. Hate to sound like the Harry Osborn of these forums, but hey- that's who I am... so, let's just say I'm lucky- cause, I got a job, got the girl and hell- I've got the money too. So, srry but your comment actually made me laugh more than anything else... good try though, you might get somebody right some time- who knows?
November
Why are you confused over the third point? Maybe, I didn't read it right- but:
"besides, marvel are in to make cash, they are going to make this film as similar to spiderman and the last stand as possible. they've noticed a money making trend and they are going to stick with it regardless of what they are telling you."
Last Stand isn't that highly regarded and by some is though of to be a profit only film- seeking profit rather than quality. You're grouping SM in with that made me think that you thought the same was true with one of the SM films (possibly SM3)... but, I may have read that wrong as well- were you talking about type of character and film or "profit only" films?
"the fact they aren't letting ang do a direct sequel to his more adult-themed hulk should highlight this enough."
Sounded like you were somewhat upset/ angry that they fired Ang and got somebody else for the job?