Synopsis being basic isn't a problem as such.
Like most of the stories anyway, are coming from archetipal stories that have been told for thousands of years..
Ulysse Anyone?, Homer? all the greek myth, etc....
And even this ones are coming from much further in history.
Take a movie like apocalypse now, leave the war and all, what do you have...
the journey of one man that goes along a river to find himself (Kurtz = Willard) and all along he has to passes tests, chalenges... etc etc...
basically, it's homer odissey in vietnam men...
but yet, the plot is simple...
no back to TIH,
the plot as show is simple, thus leaves room for a great movie cause people (Audience) without realising it are already familiar with the story... so it's a PLUS
what's a big minus is like SAVA said, the people behind....
LL has style, put he hasn't proved being Coppola....
What made Apocalypse Now so great, is the force that Coppola put in the movie (and the original novel by Conrad), his visions and (loads of acids and various drugs on set
t
Now, can anyone tell me that with such a simple plot, knowing Leterrier's and Penn's resume, they can pull off a great movie that won't be just cliche???
I hope they will, I highly doubt it for now...
(and btw, don't want to get into the "i watch more movies than you so I know better" argument, but well, the list you exposed so far Tempest19, is kinda all the same thing... Hollywood action, sci-fi etc....., Like Hunter said, there's plenty of other movie out there that are worth watching and as an aspiring film-maker, i hope you don't just get these ones as landmark...)