Bruce should create the Thomas and Wayne Foundation. There he meets young Dick Grayson in one of the orphanages he has funded. Maybe have Mad Hatter as a caretaker and abuses several of the girls,but they cant come forward..
I wouldn't, but with Gotham's institutions as corrupt and careless as they are it could happen.
Of course he can be added. The problem is that it most probably ruin the franchise/take it down to a camper level.
But in the end the figure of Robin always adds an unnecessary and camp element to Batman.
HELL to the no!Let me present this question,to anybody. Would YOU,let Christian Bale's Bruce Wayne adopt a child?
But when Bruce adopts Dick in the comics he has matured his Wayne persona, from the reckless playboy, to the businessman/philanthropist/playboy. Just because Clooney dates many chicks, it doesnt mean he isnt a serious dude. I am just saying that its about time his Wayne persona progresses to something more than the drunken playboy, so that he could do some charities and help the city in more ways than beating up clowns. As a more serious Bruce Wayne he could inspire the other members of the aristocracy into charities.Let me present this question,to anybody. Would YOU,let Christian Bale's Bruce Wayne adopt a child?
Even Bruce needs a family, even if he doesnt know it. Bruce needs Dick, he only took Jason in even though he wasnt ready for it because he was feeling lonely when Dick left him. Jason now complains that Bruce wanted him to be like Dick instead of accepting him for who he was.The only way to have a normal family is to quit as Batman and actually start a normal family. That in case that for some reason Bruce could feel the need of having a family.
He wasnt serious about calling Alfred his mother. Its probably like having two dads, but with Bruce being the more masculine and agressive one, you could relegate Alfred to mother status.Having an old man as the mother is the opposite of normal.
Then there is no point in introducing him.
I think that is exactly the reason why the vast majority of Batman fans do not want Robin in this series: the tendency of turning Batman and his stories into cheap soap opera...Even Bruce needs a family, even if he doesnt know it. Bruce needs Dick, he only took Jason in even though he wasnt ready for it because he was feeling lonely when Dick left him. Jason now complains that Bruce wanted him to be like Dick instead of accepting him for who he was.
And even in Beyond, where Bruce was bitter and sully after all those years of loneliness, Terry managed to soften him up after some time. In the JLU episode called "Epilogue" Bruce acts almost like a normal parent.

Most, if not all of Batman's relationships with his supporting cast can be relegated as cheap soap opera. As with all things, it is about execution rather than pure concept.
Agreed.Racheal didn't turn TDK into a soap opera? :S
As a kid i was mostly fascinated by the costume, the car and the action sequences. Now i am more fascinated by Bruce/Batman as a character and then by all the other things. And apart from him solving riddles and having his morals tested by the joker you cant do much else with Bruce going solo. Que in Robin(s) and the JL and you get great character insights and development and the price to pay is only suspending your disbelief a bit further.I think that is exactly the reason why the vast majority of Batman fans do not want Robin in this series: the tendency of turning Batman and his stories into cheap soap opera...![]()
The question for me would be, is Bruce Wayne, who has devoted his life to fight corruption, take advantage of corruption in order to adopt Dick?
Nolan obviously chose the version of Batman as a tragic character rather than a soap opera type, melodramatic character.Most, if not all of Batman's relationships with his supporting cast can be relegated as cheap soap opera. As with all things, it is about execution rather than pure concept.
No, but entirely the opposite.Racheal didn't turn TDK into a soap opera? :S
Becoming a father figure to a kid while dragging him to his instable and dangerous life style it's not a way to develop Batman character as a mature adult.As a kid i was mostly fascinated by the costume, the car and the action sequences. Now i am more fascinated by Bruce/Batman as a character and then by all the other things. And apart from him solving riddles and having his morals tested by the joker you cant do much else with Bruce going solo. Que in Robin(s) and the JL and you get great character insights and development and the price to pay is only suspending your disbelief a bit further.
Of course he can be added. The problem is that it most probably ruin the franchise/take it down to a camper level.
It's actually 100%.
No you!I hate robin and the people who want to see him in the movie, grow up....


I agree. It doesn't even seem like something he would do. One of the things I liked about the dynamic in the much-maligned Batman Forever was Bruce's reluctance to take on a partner; he'd rather quit than drag someone else down the path he's chosen.Becoming a father figure to a kid while dragging him to his instable and dangerous life style it's not a way to develop Batman character as a mature adult.
Having Robin as a family substitute...
Like El Payaso just said: ''The only way to have a normal family is to quit as Batman and actually start a normal family.''
But that's exactly my point. He'll never settle down and that's why he gets this weird batfamily substitute.Having Robin as a family substitute...
Like El Payaso just said: ''The only way to have a normal family is to quit as Batman and actually start a normal family.''
1) Robin is not another hero that Batman will team up with. He is his son.If they wanted to introduce other heroes into Batman's world then they should skip ahead a bit and bring in Nightwing (yes it's still technically Robin but he's grown up) but I'd prefer they leave him to fly solo.
It's also getting increasingly tiring to read entire analyses concluding why Robin will not work, instead of exploring possible scenarios why it could. It seems personal opinion has got in the way of objective critiquing.
I'm all for Robin coming into this franchise, but even so I know the risks that it entails. But really this comes with the territory, any new addition can feasibly muck the balance of things if not handled appropriately. It's just a bit saddening that fans criticize one of the premiere supporting characters of the mythos, despite this fact.
We all know Nolan isn't going to handle Robin, but a large part of me hoped that he grew a change of heart during this process. If only to see the very predictable (non)reactions from those that were completely against the idea in the first place. I've done this dance before though. With Joker and with Two-Face during the TDK hype days. The naysayers never stick around to fully enjoy the humble pie, and if they do, they're so open-minded and apologetic that you feel like an ass for trying to push it in their faces.
So f**k this useless debate. At least the Catwoman thread allows me to look at and discuss sexy wimmens.![]()
But if i remember correctly Bruce only adopted Dick because he thought he could raise him well and help him deal with his loss the way Alfred did with him. Its Dick that forces him to take him in as a sidekick when he tries to seek vengeance against his parent's killer. In Batman Forever, BTAS, The Batman, Dick forced Bruce to take him in. His circus training comes in handly because it means that Dick has some basic fighting moves and agility when he starts so he can force Batman's hand. (in before realism fans come in to point that circus training =/= martial arts. Gee its a freaking comic book. Dick can at least dodge the attacks)I agree. It doesn't even seem like something he would do. One of the things I liked about the dynamic in the much-maligned Batman Forever was Bruce's reluctance to take on a partner; he'd rather quit than drag someone else down the path he's chosen.
But that's exactly my point. He'll never settle down and that's why he gets this weird batfamily substitute. 1) Robin is not another hero that Batman will team up with. He is his son.
2) Nightwing is a whole different character than Robin. Nightwing isnt Batman's sidekick, Robin is. Dick only took on the NW persona when he left Bruce.
3) How long can Batman fly solo in his airtight world before it becomes stagnant? Some of the best Batman stories are teamup stories.![]()
But if i remember correctly Bruce only adopted Dick because he thought he could raise him well and help him deal with his loss the way Alfred did with him. Its Dick that forces him to take him in as a sidekick when he tries to seek vengeance against his parent's killer. In Batman Forever, BTAS, The Batman, Dick forced Bruce to take him in. His circus training comes in handly because it means that Dick has some basic fighting moves and agility when he starts so he can force Batman's hand. (in before realism fans come in to point that circus training =/= martial arts. Gee its a freaking comic book. Dick can at least dodge the attacks)
So you see its not like Bruce adopted Dick with the intention of turning him into a vigilante but Dick chose it and even forced him to do it. Just reset Dick's age at 16 instead of 12 and it will be fine.